|
|
| (558 intermediate revisions by 85 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Navigation (header)}} | | {{Navigation (header)}} |
| | |
| | '''''Please note that the Good Article procedure is ''no longer in use''. Please see [[UDWiki:Featured Articles]].''''' |
| | |
| | |
| {|style="background: #E6F2FF;border:solid 1px #A3B1BF;padding:10px;width:100%" | | {|style="background: #E6F2FF;border:solid 1px #A3B1BF;padding:10px;width:100%" |
| |- | | |- |
| Line 14: |
Line 18: |
| Any main namespace article (also including user pages and journal pages if they are thought to fulfil the above criteria) can be nominated for good article status. The nomination will be discussed and if there are no major issues raised at the end of 7 days, the article is promoted to Good status and will be added to the Featured Article Pool for the coming week. | | Any main namespace article (also including user pages and journal pages if they are thought to fulfil the above criteria) can be nominated for good article status. The nomination will be discussed and if there are no major issues raised at the end of 7 days, the article is promoted to Good status and will be added to the Featured Article Pool for the coming week. |
|
| |
|
| Articles that are deemed "good" will be placed in the [[:Category:Good Articles|Good Article Category]] for easy findage. | | Articles that are deemed "good" will be placed in the [[:Category:Good Articles|Good Article Category]] for easy findage. The page will also have the <nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:GA|GA]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki> template placed onto it. If a nomination is declined by the page owner then the nomination should be cycled without the page being added to the Good Article Category. |
|
| |
|
| |} | | |} |
| Line 30: |
Line 34: |
| #'''Yes''' - Much better than all the other candidates. --[[Example page|BetterMuch Ralph]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST) | | #'''Yes''' - Much better than all the other candidates. --[[Example page|BetterMuch Ralph]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST) |
| #'''Yes''' - I like this part [[Example page|here]]. --[[Example page|Specific Jen]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST) | | #'''Yes''' - I like this part [[Example page|here]]. --[[Example page|Specific Jen]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST) |
| | ====No==== |
| | #'''No''' - I don't like it. --[[Example page|Unspecific Sam]] 07:00, 8 December 2010 (UTC) |
| | #'''No''' - This issue [[Example page|here]] needs to be addressed. --[[Example page|Issue Lue]] 07:00, 8 December 2010 (UTC) |
| | |
|
| |
|
| Please add {{[[Template:GoodArticleNom|GoodArticleNom]]}} to any page that has been nominated. | | Please add {{[[Template:GoodArticleNom|GoodArticleNom]]}} to any page that has been nominated. |
|
| |
|
| ==New Nominations== | | ==New Nominations== |
| ''Place new Nominations under this header.''
| |
|
| |
| ===[[Dunell Hills Police Department]]===
| |
| One of the BIG groups, I would Suggest RRF but... eh.
| |
|
| |
| ====Yes====
| |
| #Nice layout, informative, and overall a well designed group page. Also has this:
| |
| [[Image:Penguin12.gif]]
| |
|
| |
| which is awesome...For the general subject, I think group pages should be nominated here, some of them are real good, but demanding NPOV from a group page obviously doesn't work. --[[User:MisterGame|Thadeous Oakley]] 11:20, 11 May 2009 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| ====No====
| |
| #NPOV, please. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 02:07, 11 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #'''GOOONG!!''' --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 03:38, 11 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #This isn't a ''featured groups'' section, it's about ''articles''. Sure, DHPD may be an awesome group, but the page isn't all that notable. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 08:15, 11 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #:That said, I'm not against groups being featured, although that does open up problems with meatpuppets. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 08:20, 11 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #No. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 09:54, 11 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #Naw. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 12:26, 11 May 2009 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| ===[[Amusing Locations in Malton]]=== | | ===[[Amusing Locations in Malton]]=== |
| It's fucking awesome.
| | Seriously. |
| | |
| ====Yes====
| |
| #Perhaps the best page on this fair wiki of ours.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 04:52, 10 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #After a lot of deliberation, I have to say yes.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 04:54, 10 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #Best page EVARRRR. --[[User:Blackboard|Blackboard]] 01:55, 11 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #Extremely weak yes. Get real humour. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 02:09, 11 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| :Actually, I loled at [[the Ha Monument]]. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 02:39, 11 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| | |
| ====No====
| |
| #Too much potty talk, not enough real humour. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 10:30, 10 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #Some of it's funny, but as Wan "lol cawks!!!" isn't really humor. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 11:08, 10 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #:What does that even mean? And what's that got to do with ALiM?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:27, 11 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #::What do cocks have to do with ALiM? Who would know... {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 12:59, 11 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #As Link. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 16:36, 10 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| | |
| ===[[Battle of Blackmore]]===
| |
| Normally I don't like POV stuff, but I really liked this. Pure class. It's already gotten through [[:Category:Historical Events]] voting which already says something about its quality and significance.
| |
| | |
| ====Yes====
| |
| ''Place votes of support here with reasons''
| |
| #Yes please. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 15:42, 9 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #It's awesome. Utterly POV, but it's so far gone that it doesn't actually matter anymore. Once it's obvious, it's almost neutral; because the reader adjusts it in their mind. Plus the fact that it's hilarious.--{{User:Rachel_Akebre/signature}} 22:41, 9 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #I echo the above sentiments. Its not NPOV, but then it doesn't even try to be. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 22:50, 9 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #It's very funny. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 23:22, 9 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #Hilarious. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 20:47, 10 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #Strong yes. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 02:10, 11 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| | |
| ====No====
| |
| ''Place votes against here with reasons''
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| ===[[TUMBLEWEED-aikido-river'n-stuff Tactics]]===
| |
| This nomination would speak for itself if only it weren't so busy scrambling around like a chicken with its head cut off.
| |
| ====Yes==== | | ====Yes==== |
| ''Place votes of support here with reasons'' | | *'''Yes''' - Cause in retrospect the images alone deserve showcasing. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 08:09, 19 March 2012 (UTC) |
| #Hell, yeah. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 15:36, 9 May 2009 (BST)
| | *'''Humourous Suggestion''' - This shouldn't be on the main space. Oh wait, this isn't the suggestions page. :P --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 12:57, 19 March 2012 (UTC) |
| | *Seriously one of the best articles on the wiki. ~[[Image:Vsig.png|link=User:Vapor]] <sub>01:20, 20 March 2012 (UTC)</sub> |
| | *'''Yes''' - Excellent article. --[[User:The Hierophant|Papa Moloch]] 05:08, 20 March 2012 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| ====No==== | | ====No==== |
| ''Place votes against here with reasons''
| | *clearly there are no standards for this anymore apparently. Nothing has changed since it failed it's last votwe and it's never been what could be considered a quality contribution to the wiki or an example of exemplary content. It's a bunch of snickering at unfortionate naming conventions for locations. Hell, a large part of why it exists is to explicitly violate three of the four criteria listed here. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev#Buildings_Update_Danger_Maps|maps 2.0?!]]</font></sup></small> 05:58, 20 March 2012 (UTC) |
| #Nahhhh.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 04:54, 10 May 2009 (BST)
| | *:Of course there are no standards for this anymore, no one is making any decent articles and we still need articles to cycle onto featured articles. I say we do our best to promote rewards for decent articles. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 10:56, 10 April 2012 (BST) |
| #Nope. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 02:38, 11 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| | |
| ===[[River Tactics]]===
| |
| This nomination should speak for itself.
| |
| ====Yes====
| |
| ''Place votes of support here with reasons'' | |
| #Well, yeah. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 15:34, 9 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #I remember reading it when I was a little boy. Beautiful stuff. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 15:36, 9 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #Quotes are awesome. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 16:15, 9 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #Very well written. And a good tactic.--{{User:Rachel_Akebre/signature}} 22:44, 9 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #As DDS.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 04:55, 10 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #As J3D.--[[User:MisterGame|Thadeous Oakley]] 11:11, 11 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| | |
| ====No====
| |
| ''Place votes against here with reasons''
| |
| | |
| ===[[Guides:First Day in Malton]]===
| |
| Very well written guide and covers pretty much everything you need to know about the game. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 16:27, 8 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| ====Yes====
| |
| ''Place votes of support here with reasons''
| |
| #As per above. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 16:27, 8 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #Balanced. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 17:52, 10 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #As above. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 02:11, 11 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| | |
| ====No====
| |
| ''Place votes against here with reasons''
| |
| | |
| ----
| |
| | |
| ===[[The Pluto Press]]===
| |
| It speaks for itself. To bad sonny stopped updating it.--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 03:12, 6 May 2009 (BST) | |
| | |
| ====Yes====
| |
| ''Place votes of support here with reasons'' | |
| #Lawl--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 03:12, 6 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| | |
| ====No====
| |
| ''Place votes against here with reasons''
| |
| #Because Pluto isn't a planet. (actually, I'm not a big fan of the format.) --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 03:22, 6 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #Because Pluto is a dog. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 15:28, 9 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #Because Pluto sucks. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 02:35, 11 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #Because Sonny stopped updating it.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:03, 11 May 2009 (BST) | |
| ----
| |
| | |
| ===[[Ridleybank/History]]===
| |
| Created by the RRF, this is an awesome page, with great original content and informative as well. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 22:42, 4 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| | |
| ====Yes====
| |
| ''Place votes of support here with reasons''
| |
| #My nomination, my vote. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 22:42, 4 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #Yarp. I like it. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 16:27, 8 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| | |
| ====No====
| |
| ''Place votes against here with reasons''
| |
| #I like the content and it is well written but it's just a bit to bland in my opinion. If some links were thrown in where suburbs and locations were mentioned, it would definitely help its readability. Plus a picture, if one were so inclined. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 09:06, 9 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #It's dry and uninspiring. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 15:29, 9 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #As Wan. Needs moar pics. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 03:45, 11 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| | |
| ----
| |
| | |
| | |
|
| |
|
| ==Recent Nominations== | | ==Recent Nominations== |
| ''Nomination discussion that have concluded in the past 7 days should be placed here. For older nominations, see the [[UDWiki:Featured Articles/Good Articles/Archive|Archive]].'' | | ''Older nominations can be found in the [[UDWiki:Featured Articles/Good Articles/Archive|archive]].'' |
| ===[[User:A Helpful Little Gnome]]===
| |
| It's plain awesomeness and the fact that he's got very damn close to an exact replica of a UD screen. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 14:48, 2 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| | |
| ====Yes====
| |
| ''Place votes of support here with reasons''
| |
| #As per above. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 14:48, 2 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #As Cheese. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 14:56, 2 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #As above. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 16:26, 2 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #That is awesome. As per above. --[[User:Cpl Adrian Shephard|Cpl Adrian Shephard]] 17:55, 2 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #That was REALLY awesome. --{{User:Lorddragonfang/sig}} 21:24, 2 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #As per Haliman. {{User:Speels/Sig}} 04:16, 3 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #As per above. --{{User:Dr Eddie Ashford/Sig}} 13:11, 3 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #Its a brilliant piece of work. [[User:Cwissball|'''Cwissball''']] <sup>[[Player Killer|PKer]] / [[Dual Nature Policy|Dual Nature]]</sup> 23:13, 3 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #If it weren't so awesome, I would never vote for a page like this. But incredible. Truly incredible.--{{User:The_shoemaker/Sig}} 01:40, 4 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #Apparently we are looking for awesome, that page is awesome, thus it is what we are looking for. Or something like that anyway. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 00:10, 9 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| | |
| ====No====
| |
| ''Place votes against here with reasons ''
| |
| #It's a great page, but I don't think user pages should be featured articles. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 16:14, 2 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #Given that user pages can be changed to be totally different on the whim of the owner, I don't think it's wise to allow them in. If it was a user sub page dedicated to his game, I'd vote yeah, for sure <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 08:13 4 May 2009 (BST)</small>
| |
| #I'm with Pestolence. --[[User:Giles Sednik|Giles Sednik]] <sup>[[CAPD]][[SWA]]</sup> 20:13, 4 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #I <333 this page. But, I have to agree with Boxy. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 01:43, 10 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #As the other naysayers.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 04:53, 10 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| | |
| *'''Unsuccessful''' - While the page is unanimously agreed to be awesome, the fact that it is Gnome main user page and liable to change is an issue that should be corrected first. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 15:24, 11 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| ----
| |
| | |
| ===[[New user template]]===
| |
| This page provides helpful information for new users that can allow them to easily customize their own user page. All of the info they need it right in front of them, in a copy-pastable format. All they need to do is decide where to put it and fill in the gaps. --{{User:The_shoemaker/Sig}} 01:47, 1 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| ====Yes====
| |
| | |
| I support the page because I believe it could really help all of the new users that come in all day every day. With customized pages, they can feel free to then get active within the wiki without worrying about their page all the time. Besides, I don't really see, to no one's offense, any pages that actually try to help people on the nominee list right now anyways. --{{User:The_shoemaker/Sig}} 01:50, 1 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| | |
| ====No====
| |
| # I don't support teaching newbies with HTML. This is a wiki. It also has ''no'' formatting, hence why it is difficult to read. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 03:20, 1 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| # <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 04:03 1 May 2009 (BST)</small>
| |
| #:Reason please, Boxy.{{unsigned|The shoemaker|00:35, 3 May 2009}}
| |
| #::It's title isn't descriptive, and the content is confusing and badly formatted. It's mostly a duplicate of content already in the [[Help:Editing|help section]], and what isn't could be covered with a few lines being added to [[Help:Basic Formatting|the basic formatting]] page <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 08:08 4 May 2009 (BST)</small>
| |
| #The page needs ''a lot'' of work to be considered even passable. -<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 10:09, 7 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| | |
| *'''Unsuccessful''' - Page is deemed unsuitable in its present form and needs a lot of work to bring it up to scratch. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 16:32, 8 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| ----
| |
| | |
| | |
| ===[[Rat Tactics]]===
| |
| | |
| Developed independently of the similarly themed, if more well known, [[HIPS|Hiding in Plain Sight]] page. Rat Tactics predates that -- just barely. These are the tactics that helped us survive, even sometimes almost thrive, during the March of the Dead. And anyone who says it was because of Kevan boosting syringe rates just wasn't there, ''surviving''... rat style. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 20:08, 30 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| | |
| ====Yes====
| |
| ''Place votes of support here with reasons''
| |
| #c.f. my nomination, above --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 20:08, 30 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| #Yar. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 14:48, 2 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #This is a great article. I remember reading about and using these tactics. Very helpful. A fun, interesting style of writing. Nuabreed knows his stuff. --[[User:Giles Sednik|Giles Sednik]] <sup>[[CAPD]][[SWA]]</sup> 06:02, 8 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| # Yes. -- --[[User:Athur birling|Athur birling]] 08:56, 8 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| # Yes. --[[User:Le bourreau|Le bourreau]] 11:53, 8 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| # Yes. --[[User:Jim Bim|Jim Bim]] 22:50, 8 May 2009 (GMT)
| |
| | |
| ====No====
| |
| ''Place votes against here with reasons ''
| |
| | |
| *'''Successful''' - The plebs have spoken. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 10:53, 8 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| ----
| |
| ===[[User:Grim s/Grims guide to staying alive]]===
| |
| Controversial, influential ''and'' mostly dead on the money -- if a bit, uh, overly cynical and at times quite over the top. Kinda like good ole Grim himself.... --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 20:08, 30 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| | |
| ====Yes====
| |
| ''Place votes of support here with reasons''
| |
| #I nominated the gorram thing --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 19:58, 30 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| #I was never a huge fan of Grim but this amused me. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 14:48, 2 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #A great piece of work. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 23:38, 3 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #Influenced my later guide (which is in need of a rewrite,) and a good guide for newer players, if it is a bit aggressive. Very nice piece of work. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 12:42, 7 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| | |
| ====No====
| |
| ''Place votes against here with reasons ''
| |
| | |
| *'''Successful''' - While Grim may be gone, his sense of humour will live on. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 10:53, 8 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| ----
| |
| | |
| | |
| ===[[First Siege of Caiger Mall]]===
| |
| Pretty well written article, it's got plenty of information in it and it's pretty interesting to read. Particularly since Caiger has a lot of history and this was the first major siege that occurred in front of it. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 19:53, 29 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| | |
| ====Yes====
| |
| ''Place votes of support here with reasons''
| |
| #As per reasoning above. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 19:53, 29 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| #Although can we not replace those pesky red links with simple bolded text? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:03, 29 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| #This is arguably the most important allusion to UD's past, and a very popular one. I agree with Rosslessness- if this does get chosen, we should simply bold the dead links. --{{User:Lorddragonfang/sig}} 00:04, 30 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| #'''Yes''' - but kill those red links with bolded text or undelete the pages. Also - as above. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 09:51, 30 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| #Yuh. Some history is dead, but we can still record it ;) --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 19:53, 30 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| #I like this page, I suggested this on [[UDWiki_talk:Featured_Articles]]. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 03:18, 1 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #As all above, but I'm going to remove the red links as Ross suggested. Really annoying. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 23:52, 3 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| | |
| ====No====
| |
| ''Place votes against here with reasons''
| |
| | |
| *'''Successful''' - Red links aside, this wins. =) -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 10:53, 8 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| ----
| |
| ===[[RNG]]===
| |
| Pretty interesting and gives background on something that is at the core of our Urban Dead experience. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 19:53, 29 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| | |
| ====Yes====
| |
| ''Place votes of support here with reasons''
| |
| #As per reasoning above. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 19:53, 29 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| #Although I preferred my old testament RNG. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 09:51, 30 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| #I suggested this on [[UDWiki_talk:Featured_Articles]]. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 03:18, 1 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #This is a great article. Very thorough and useful. The info applies to everyone.--[[User:Giles Sednik|Giles Sednik]] <sup>[[CAPD]][[SWA]]</sup> 20:43, 4 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| | |
| ====No====
| |
| ''Place votes against here with reasons''
| |
| #I'm not a fan of this article, and I wrote most of it's current content. Apart from that fact it could very well be wrong in some parts due to my limited knowledge of such functions, the main thing is that I think it reads a bit poorly in some places. Doesn't flow right. A second set of eyes could probably improve it a lot just with some restructure and reordering. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 17:39, 30 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| # Meh --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 19:51, 30 April 2009 (BST) To elaborate, it just doesn't excite me. <_< --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 20:00, 30 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| # As Wan. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 22:08, 2 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| | |
| *'''Unsuccessful''' - Several negative points raised and needs some fixing. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 10:53, 8 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| ----
| |
| | |
| ===[[NecroWatch]]===
| |
| Main page for the NecroWatch project which is ''a good mix of fluff, encourages survivors to take risks and be proactive, and in its mission tries to get more people to contribute to the Wiki.'' <small>Quote from [[User:extropymine|extropymine]] during original discussion about Featured Articles</small>. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 19:53, 29 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| | |
| ====Yes====
| |
| ''Place votes of support here with reasons''
| |
| #As per reasoning above. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 19:53, 29 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| #One day I will get the cake. I always like A.L.I.C.E. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:08, 29 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| # *coughthecakeisaliecough* Excellently written, creative, well formatted, and useful to boot. Certainly seems like feature material to me. -{{User:Lorddragonfang/NWsig}} 00:11, 30 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| #I love the Necrowatch stuff. I am not only saying this because A.L.I.C.E. will open to the doors to the NecroTech facility in which my character is sleeping if I don't. --[[User:Cpl Adrian Shephard|Cpl Adrian Shephard]] 00:56, 30 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| #Very useful service, and should be plugged at every change. Like now. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 09:51, 30 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| #The cake is very hard to get down...there's no milk! Other than that, I absolutely agree--[[User:Dr Mycroft Chris|Dr Mycroft Chris]] 14:22, 30 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| #I heartily endorse this nomination. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 17:32, 30 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| #Who the hell is ALICE?? ;) --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 19:53, 30 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| #For the cause! {{User:VI/S}} 23:14, 30 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| #For great justice! --[[User:N00bert|<span style="color: Purple">N00bert</span>]] <sup>[[FOXHOUND|<span style="color: Orange">foxhound</span>]]</sup> <sup>[[Dulston Alliance|<span style="color: Cyan">DA</span>]]</sup> <sup>[[NecroWatch|<span style="color: DarkMagenta">NW</span>]]</sup> 01:38, 1 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #Good stuff. I gots to get backs to dat. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 05:55, 1 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| #As above. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 22:34, 4 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| | |
| ====No====
| |
| ''Place votes against here with reasons''
| |
| | |
| *'''Successful''' - Pretty much unanimous. =) -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 10:53, 8 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| :I'd say more than "pretty much", mate. {{User:VI/S}} 16:21, 8 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| ----
| |
| | |
| ===[[Trenchcoater]]===
| |
| Need I say more? This page is very funny to read and is overall awesome. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 19:53, 29 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| | |
| ====Yes====
| |
| ''Place votes of support here with reasons''
| |
| #As per reasoning above. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 19:53, 29 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| #Does anyone need to say more? --{{User:Lorddragonfang/sig}} 00:09, 30 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| #GLORY TO THE TRENCHCOAT! --{{User:OrangeGaf/Sig}} 00:30, 30 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| #I'll need guns. Lots of guns. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 19:55, 30 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| #:<s>'''Weak Yes''' - It's a hilarious page as it is, but it definitely could be improved, as Link said in the No section. It deserves to be featured, but maybe cleaned up a little first. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 20:21, 30 April 2009 (BST)</s> <sub>Changing my vote. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 16:53, 3 May 2009 (BST)</sub>
| |
| #I like this page, I suggested this on [[UDWiki_talk:Featured_Articles]]. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 03:18, 1 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| | |
| ====No====
| |
| ''Place votes against here with reasons''
| |
| #But reluctantly. It's funny, but it's little more then a piss-take at trenchcoaters, without examining common trenchie mistakes, etc. The current page (which is mostly quotes) should be moved off to a subpage and a new page built in it's ashes. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 12:17, 30 April 2009 (BST)
| |
| #Not in it's current place. It's not a good example of a [[:Category:Glossary|glossary]] page. Move it to somewhere like [[Trenchcoater Folklore]], and place an actual glossary article (including a link to this page) at [[Trenchcoater]], and then I'd change my vote <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 04:02 1 May 2009 (BST)</small>
| |
| #As Boxy. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 16:53, 3 May 2009 (BST)
| |
|
| |
|
| *'''Unsuccessful''' - Needs re-writing to correct the points raised in discussion. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 10:53, 8 May 2009 (BST)
| | [[Category:Good Article Nominees]] |
| ----
| |
01:20, 20 March 2012 (UTC)