User talk:Priapus

Got anything to say to Priapus? Spill it here!--Priapus 18:27, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

P8Z Badge

That was fucking awesome. I guess you realize I'm just playing around with those reports. Thanks for playing along. I'll repent of my misinformation campaign as soon as I get a chance... --Paddy Dignam 20:34, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

I'll second Paddy's compliments. Thanks for the excellent work. Hold down the biting and we'll hold an open-door session for you guys to come to. Strip twister could be difficult (if not impossible) but I'd bet that zombie karaoke would be a winner. Interested? --R33F3RM4N 21:55, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Get this straight

If you try to destroy the BMC name using my past one more time like that, I'm going to go on a Juicybraindrinker spree and start creating templates and such relating Juicy to the FU, do you understand me? If you want to continue holding an unjust prejudice on me, despite an entire year having gone by, and not give me a chance to change, you can just shut the fuck up. If you try to make the BMC look bad again, you get to watch as I smear shame all over the FU. I named myself "the man" on this wiki because I don't want every person in the world to be able to personally identify me, neither in-game nor in real life and especially because I definitely don't want it to appear as if I represent the BMC in any way. Note: I would just like to remind you that it was killdare and Snuffleuff that made it into a enormous issue and not me. I started the problem but you fanned the flames. The man 18:08, 3 April 2008 (BST)

First of all, i don't like to stir up problems, but I happen to have a nasty temper that I can't always control, the above post is one such example, although this time its with a good reason. How can you not expect me to get mad when you talk shit about me and relate my past behaviour as an example of the BMC onto the SA talk page and all the trolls there? You could easily have said, "I know for a fact that "the man" is not kevan. Second, with regards to your comments about anonymousity,... "Priapus" isn't your real name! hypocrite! Third, what sort of indication gave you the idea that I represent the BMC? Am I in the council? Only the council represent the BMC in public affairs and I am only in the BMC because I have friends there and like to chat there and help out internally from time to time. Oh yeah, you did not comment on the fact that killdare and snuffleuff made a huge deal out of one mistake that I made, not to mention hiring the heathers to eliminate me from the game. I take it you agree with me when I say that this was totally uncalled for? The man 18:46, 3 April 2008 (BST)

Haha! The Man is having a melt down. Further proof that he's a liability to BMC. Nice find Priapus.--ScoobyDooDoobie 19:06, 3 April 2008 (BST)

This needs to go on the wall. That reminds me, we need a wall. I think we also need to check some of The Man's other posts because his brain seems to melt every time he types anything. --Laughing Man 19:57, 3 April 2008 (BST)

"Note: I would just like to remind you that it was killdare and Snuffleuff that made it into a enormous issue and not me." "Oh yeah, you did not comment on the fact that killdare and snuffleuff made a huge deal out of one mistake that I made, not to mention hiring the heathers to eliminate me from the game." Just for the record... A) I have no idea what "it" is that this kid is referring to regarding me. I dunno nothin' bout no steeking 'enormous issues'. B) I didn't hire the Heathers, nobody hires the Heathers. Apparently, one either attracts their attention or doesn't. I'm left befuddled, as I haven't spoken to "the man" for about a year, nor had any contact with him, yet he's still ranting about me? WTF? --Snuffleuff 11:05, 10 May 2008 (BST)

Instinct

Well, you are zombies, aren't u? I heard that your agents have participated (and still are) in the fall of Shackleville. Any FU members found in Shackleville will be killed on spot, hence the issuing of the black spot. I have identified you as an "Axis of Evil" so to speak. I have no quarrel with you as a group in general, only that you are causing havoc in my neighborhood. Understand? If you leave Shackleville, I will be more than happy to remove the black spot and all other sentiments, no questions asked. --Gehennanow^† 20:07, 29 March 2007 (BST)

Please remove it! Please! WE'RE MARKED! Oh the humanity! - --Gut stench ^{FU BAR} 20:39, 29 March 2007 (BST)

lol --Gehennanow^† 21:36, 29 March 2007 (BST)

I am pleased that you find the Black Spot amusing, I got a chuckle out of it after I made the template. It's a shame that we're not on the same side. I once had a powerful zombie alt but I find playing as the human team much more interesting. If the zombies were to dominate Malton, there would only be zeds roaming around empty buildings. If humans were to conquer, then there still would interaction between groups/factions and PKing. Plus, I can't say that I have ever watched a zombie movie (Shaun of the Dead) and rooted for the zombies, sorry dudes. Although I empathize with your appetite for destruction, I cannot allow you to flatten Malton even if it leads to the end of my own group. --Gehennanow^† 14:37, 30 March 2007 (BST)

danger level

I made my change after seeing the recent reply by some user who said the only reason the suburb isn't safe is because there are PKers. Seeing as this is not a criterion for danger levels I chnaged it to green. i made the mistake of not doing a bit of research and not making a comment on the wiki, I can assure you it won't happen again. The man 19:58, 21 September 2007 (BST)

read

please read the page you are commenting on before making such a comment, all that you stated with regards to the FU Is already stated in the main page. As I said on my reply to to talk page, it is written in big bold letters that the FU does condone zerging and had no know how on the current activities. The man 12:59, 20 October 2007 (BST)

As circles is the predominant metaphor of our discussion, it is only fitting that I respond

To be clear Priapus, speaking as Albert the wiki user (which I very rarely do) I in no way intended to accuse you of actions that violate the game rules; rather Albert, an in game character, accused you of actions that violate his sense of decency: an offense which you, as a zombie character, are perfectly within your rights to commit. This is a game and as such I steer away from meta-discourse in game at all costs. The primary purpose of the statement was to indicate that your behavior, if it continues, will give him license to use certain countermeasures in his fight for the building that he would otherwise not employ.

Speaking as Albert the character, I take by your response that the retaliatory, I believe you call it devivification in violation of common decency will continue. I will therefore adjust my strategy when dealing with you and inform my group to do the same. I can assure you that such measures are reversible and if you ever decide to drop by Colglough while in human form for conversation, I maintain an open door policy to all guests including Feral Undead who act in accordance with reason and good manners within its walls. I have no interest in having a nemesis, but if you wish to act the part I will not begrudge you the opportunity to do so. I can further assure you that I realize that your actions do not speak for your zambah bazzahz and will still deal with them in a manner unchanged by this disagreement.

As to my claim on Colglough, I realize that the ferals have been in this area for a long time and do not expect the recognition that I grant them with the fort. I do think it worth mentioning that, when I came to whittenide, it was a ghost town meaning that it had no substantial survivor or zombie presence. Colglough was empty and its design had not been changed since the early outbreak. To put it tritely, I did not see your name on it so... finders keepers. That said, I fully realize that you will fight me for it and I expect nothing less. Just let it be known that Colglough is a Necrotech facility so I will, as a general rule, assume that those within its walls, feral or not, are asking for revivification. For more on this please look for an upcoming treatise that I shall be posting on the ethics of the combat revive.

Speaking once more as a wiki user, you are welcome in the forum but I do not check it a often as I do the wiki. If the concerns you mention involve zerging, I would preempt your comment by clarifying that, not putting my group at a strategic disadvantage, the precision of our strikes can be partly attributed to the fact that I live with at least one member of my group and communicate with others frequently. Beyond this, I welcome your input on the forum any time; the main board is open to all guests.

Speaking finally as Albert the character, it grieves me somewhat that we have been unable to come to an accord on Colglough but I remain hopeful that such a thin may in the future be possible. Until then, see you around and watch the back of your neck for incoming syringes.

Yours in science,

-- Albert Schwan  00:45, 14 April 2010 (BST)

Corvus brachyrhyncho-phagia

(Meta)I stand corrected. The information I viewed was something I was directed to by a member of a pro-zerging group. I have been unable to relocate this information and have viewed the statemet you reference. I beleive we may consider the horse to be dead, beaten, revivified, killed, and beaten again, but it would seem that the horse was asking for it. After reading the Faq and finding out about auto-banning, I must say that I am just glad I am not the horse and will take precautions to ensure that my wife and I remain on separate computers using separate IPs (end Meta) -- Albert Schwan  21:52, 16 April 2010 (BST)