Revision as of 00:55, 14 June 2009

Obtaining Historical Status

A policy is in place which outlines the method to attain historical status.

Groups must no longer actively contribute to the game.
A nomination should be made on Category talk:Historical Groups.
Within two weeks of a nomination, the group must be approved by 2/3 of the voters, with a minimum of 15 voters for a nomination to pass. The only allowable votes are Yes and No.
Groups that pass will be added to the category as described below.
Groups must allow a week to pass between nominations.

When nominating a group, please add a note to Template:Wiki News and add {{HistoricalGroupVoting}} to the top of the group's page.

The_Dead. Let's do this and move on before the rules change. For those of you that don't know us.

The last two are the ones we are the proudest of.-- #99 ^DCC 23:18, 13 June 2009 (BST)

For/Vouch/Pro etc What can I say about the dead that hasn't been said before? Creating an apocalypse in a game that is apocalyptic itself. Good times it were. Some intentions like "breaking the game" were perhaps not so noble but in the end, you provided unseen excitement in the sometimes dull city of Malton. --Thadeous Oakley 23:33, 13 June 2009 (BST)
On a side note, wouldn't it be better to nominate the March of the Dead as a historical event? This because this group is still active and such.--Thadeous Oakley 23:35, 13 June 2009 (BST)
For --Sonny Corleone ^{DORIS I jizzed in my pants pr0n} 23:45, 13 June 2009 (BST)
HELL YES - The only group that ever brought challenge to the "game". DO IT AGAIN.--Zombie Lord 00:45, 14 June 2009 (BST)
\o/--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 00:54, 14 June 2009 (BST)
Yes - User:Whitehouse 01:33, 14 June 2009 (BST)

No - Fails crit 1 "Groups must no longer actively contribute to the game." Perhaps you can vote yes on historical event status for the March of The Dead.--_GANG Giles Sednik_CAPD 01:38, 14 June 2009 (BST)
yes and no Certainly one of the biggest things ever to happen to the game and certainly worthy of inclusion... On the other hand Historical Groups are supposed to be defunct so technically the Dead are unlikely to become historical in that sense.--Honestmistake 01:43, 14 June 2009 (BST)
Vouch, but needs Crit 1 - As Giles. They deserve historical status, but currently have too many members still acting, or at least with "The Dead" in their group tags. --Private Mark 01:55, 14 June 2009 (BST)

There have been no recent nominations

There are 3 archives for this page.

	Things Best Forgotten
	This Category talk page has an archive.

	Things Best Forgotten
	This Category talk page has an archive.

	Things Best Forgotten
	This Category talk page has an archive.

This is a heading to which discussion of the use and catagorization of Historical Groups can be put.

@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 #'''No''' - Fails crit 1 ''"Groups must no longer actively contribute to the game."'' Perhaps you can vote yes on [[Category_talk:Historical_Events#March_of_the_dead|historical event status for the March of The Dead]].--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 01:38, 14 June 2009 (BST)
 #'''yes and no''' Certainly one of the biggest things ever to happen to the game and certainly worthy of inclusion... On the other hand Historical Groups are supposed to be defunct so technically the Dead are unlikely to become historical in that sense.--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 01:43, 14 June 2009 (BST)
+#'''Vouch, but needs Crit 1''' - As Giles. They deserve historical status, but currently have too many members still acting, or at least with "The Dead" in their group tags. --[[User:Macampos|Private Mark]] 01:55, 14 June 2009 (BST)
 ==Recent Nominations==