UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Reevaluation for Bureaucrats: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→For) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
#For. I also find DDR's point moot, as the current system supersedes A/RE anyway, why would an amended length not do the same? {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 19:28, 13 May 2011 (BST) | #For. I also find DDR's point moot, as the current system supersedes A/RE anyway, why would an amended length not do the same? {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 19:28, 13 May 2011 (BST) | ||
#'''For''' - Fair enough.--[[User:Yonnua Koponen|<span style="color: DarkOrange">Yonnua Koponen</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Yonnua Koponen| <span style="color:Gold">T</span>]][[DvB| <span style="color: Goldenrod">G</span>]]</sup><sup><span class="stealthexternallink">[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=840689 <span style="color: DarkGoldenrod"> P</span>] </span></sup> [[User:Yonnua Koponen/Sandbox|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]][[Discosaurs|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]][[{{TALKPAGENAME}}#Donkey|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]] 21:03, 13 May 2011 (BST) | #'''For''' - Fair enough.--[[User:Yonnua Koponen|<span style="color: DarkOrange">Yonnua Koponen</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Yonnua Koponen| <span style="color:Gold">T</span>]][[DvB| <span style="color: Goldenrod">G</span>]]</sup><sup><span class="stealthexternallink">[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=840689 <span style="color: DarkGoldenrod"> P</span>] </span></sup> [[User:Yonnua Koponen/Sandbox|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]][[Discosaurs|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]][[{{TALKPAGENAME}}#Donkey|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]] 21:03, 13 May 2011 (BST) | ||
#-- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig4}} 02:44, 14 May 2011 (BST) | |||
===Against=== | ===Against=== | ||
Revision as of 01:44, 14 May 2011
This line of A/BP will be changed to reflect the 8 months cycle.
| said: |
| If, for any reason, an individual Bureaucrat position hasn't faced an election after 12 months, then an election is called after that period. |
New Text would be
| said: |
| If, for any reason, an individual Bureaucrat position hasn't faced an election after 8 months, then an election is called after that period. |
Voting Section
| Voting Rules |
Votes must be numbered, signed, and timestamped. They can take one of two forms:
Votes that do not conform to the above will be struck by a sysop. |
| The only valid voting sections are For and Against. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote. |
For
- Author Vote - This just makes sense. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 15:30, 13 May 2011 (BST)
- Down with the cats! Srsly, it would just get rid of a needless complication in the current system. --Oh, and vote on Project Funny, by the way. -- Spiderzed█ 15:39, 13 May 2011 (BST)
- Makes sense. -- Cheese 15:49, 13 May 2011 (BST)
- For. I also find DDR's point moot, as the current system supersedes A/RE anyway, why would an amended length not do the same?
19:28, 13 May 2011 (BST) - For - Fair enough.--Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 21:03, 13 May 2011 (BST)
- -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 02:44, 14 May 2011 (BST)
Against
incomplete. if said crat has not faced an election in 8 months they will find themselves up for evaluation as per A/RE policy. it should specify that an election will replace the A/RE evaluation, rather accompany it. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 17:52, 13 May 2011 (BST)- That is actually already in the A/RE policy itself as documented on the talk page. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 21:17, 13 May 2011 (BST)
- Right you are. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 02:44, 14 May 2011 (BST)
- That is actually already in the A/RE policy itself as documented on the talk page. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 21:17, 13 May 2011 (BST)
