User talk:Cyberbob240

Main | Talk | Sandpit | Signature | Archive | Talk Archive | Classification List | Arbitration | DEM Roster User talk:Cyberbob The Drama Llama is Watching You The owner of this page reserves the right to delete trolling and drama at their discretion. Things Best Forgotten This talk page has an Archive, which is updated when this page gets too long. All talk from the previous time interval will be placed there. A guide to posting here - READ THIS Pretty simple really, just make a new subject (using the ===title=== format) at the bottom of the section it comes under. Then, type your comments in underneath. SIGN YOUR POSTS. If you don't know how to, simply type --~~~~ at the end of your post. Any posts without a signature WILL BE DELETED. Helps to keep things organised. Oh, one more thing. Could you please, for the love of God, put any new headings at the bottom of their section? Editing the Wiki If you have anything to discuss regarding the upkeep of the wiki, put it here. J3D's latest If J3D is going to be warned for impersonating a sysop, how long is the template going to stay on his page? --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 07:23, 28 August 2009 (BST) That's a good point. Your reward shall be having the honour of being the one to remove it. (might be prudent to ask him to do so first before wading in) Cyberbob  Talk  08:32, 28 August 2009 (BST) Nice try, why should I be the one to do it? I don't have a problem with having him on there. As the voter of vandalism and the giver of the warning, perhaps it should be your reward. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 09:08, 28 August 2009 (BST) Fine, I'll do it - though you should be willing to uphold the decisions of the team even if you disagree with them. Cyberbob  Talk  09:17, 28 August 2009 (BST) As I would have if I hadn't been offended by your passing it onto me :'( --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 09:19, 28 August 2009 (BST) delicate like a flower Cyberbob  Talk  09:20, 28 August 2009 (BST) yet only you can break me <3 --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 09:25, 28 August 2009 (BST) Orphaned Recruitment pages I noticed that a lot of the orphaned pages are abandoned recruitment adverts. Now in fairness it doesn't look like they will be reused. What do you think? Put them up for deletions, move them into their groups namespace, or just leave a message on the groups talk page, with a link to the old recruitment add included? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 13:23, 21 September 2009 (BST) Hm, I think I remember taking a look at these myself and not being able to work up the effort to do anything about them at the time. Personally I would say have them deleted, but it's probably a better idea for them to be moved into subpages with maybe a short note left on the group's talk page alerting them to their ad's new location. If you set the request up on A/MR I'll be happy to do it. Cyberbob  Talk  13:35, 21 September 2009 (BST) Cool, Ill do some tonight. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 15:23, 21 September 2009 (BST) Ive created a complete list of all the orphans (Making them not orpahns, but anyway.) Do you think a template would be best, that way I can roll it out on all the talk pages? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 16:01, 21 September 2009 (BST) Feel free to take Necrotech_Assassins/Recruitment off the list now. It's mine, and I put it up for speedy.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 16:18, 21 September 2009 (BST) A template sounds like the easiest way to do it, yeah. Cyberbob  Talk  16:36, 21 September 2009 (BST) Hang on, it looks like they're all subpages already. No need for A/MR I guess; I'll give you a hand with the posting of the template. Cyberbob  Talk  16:40, 21 September 2009 (BST) Nubis did the latter (of ross' post) quite a bit, I think it's a pretty good way to go, at leased in terms of cleaning up orphaned pages. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 16:42, 21 September 2009 (BST) List of all orphaned recruitment pages --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 17:46, 21 September 2009 (BST) You don't intend on bringing this into the mainspace, yeah? --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 17:58, 21 September 2009 (BST) Why would I? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 18:10, 21 September 2009 (BST) Orphaned Page The following page(s) were orphaned, meaning they weren't linked from any other page on UDWiki. For house-keeping's sake, we are adding the link onto the relevant talk page. If you don't want the pages anymore just post them on the Deletions Page. You aren't required to do anything, but we'd appreciate if it you kept the link on any one of your pages. Please note that the link provided below will not remove the page from Orphaned Pages, so you'll still need to manually make a link for us. Thank you. Hows that? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 15:43, 22 September 2009 (BST) Looking good! Cyberbob  Talk  15:50, 22 September 2009 (BST) Bob's amazing dissappearing comments Hmm, I was just looking at a/vb, and noticed some rather odd things. Firstly, there was your moving of Read's comment to the talk, which seemed to undo itself, then redo itself again. But you already seem to know about that, so that isn't the issue. i'm more concerned with the fact that you responded to Akule on the DCC case, and the response isn't appearing on the page. In fact, I came along and responded myself, because I saw no response. Odd. Any idea why?--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:31, 25 September 2009 (BST) I have absolutely no idea. My best guess would be something to do with when I opened the tabs in which I made my edits. Cyberbob  Talk  22:34, 25 September 2009 (BST) Very odd indeed. If you want your comment in the conversation, then I moved his original message to the talk.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:38, 25 September 2009 (BST) Nah, yours covers the point just fine on its own. Cyberbob  Talk  23:07, 25 September 2009 (BST) Criticism If you have any complaints about my conduct, place them here. Protections I know I've been away for a while, but editing a protected page is still misconduct? Right? :p -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 18:07, 15 September 2009 (BST) Oh, whoops - I didn't spot that you wanted feedback on the main page and I didn't spot that the talk page was protected. It's weird - normally there's a warning message that pops up when you go to edit a protected page but it didn't happen this time. I'll move the comment to the main page. Cyberbob  Talk  18:10, 15 September 2009 (BST) My wonderful unspoiled history, and you sullied it! My wonderful system for keeping the uninvited off the main page doesn't seem to be going well either :p I remember the fun of throwing out a thousand misconduct and A/VB cases, considering I could have two successful ones in as many minutes, you'd best be remembering that next time someone bad mouths me :p -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 18:15, 15 September 2009 (BST) If you want the history wiped just submit it for Speedy Deletion and recreate it. Nobody would be so dumb as to call you out on recreating a deleted page with this conversation on the record. Cyberbob  Talk  18:17, 15 September 2009 (BST) DID YOU JUST PUSH THE '+' BUTTON ON MY TALK PAGE????!!??!?!?! RWAAAAAARRRRR! Up the drama meter, miscondandalisibration all over the wiki for this! Oh, and I invite you to add any thoughts you have. ;) And you just edit conflicted me :p -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 18:22, 15 September 2009 (BST) im tirde Cyberbob  Talk  18:24, 15 September 2009 (BST) I'd dump you too Seriously, you suck, I can tell why she would have gone off and banged several other dudes--CyberRead240 14:56, 26 September 2009 (BST) I guess that's what you get when you meet a ho off WoW right?--CyberRead240 14:58, 26 September 2009 (BST) Sure get's personal in here...--Thadeous Oakley 15:31, 26 September 2009 (BST) Don't stop, I'm enjoying watching you grasp desperately for something you think might fit Cyberbob  Talk  15:37, 26 September 2009 (BST) Unfortunately for you, thats what she said. To 7 other guys.--CyberRead240 15:41, 26 September 2009 (BST) bottom of the barrel stuff right there Cyberbob  Talk  16:00, 26 September 2009 (BST) Praise If you wish to congratulate me or say thanks for anything I've done, please do so here. Good job Having different headers for praise and criticism and such is all nice and dandy, but when you got so much shit on your talk page things get cluttered real fast. Praise for finally archiving things. May I humbly suggest that you do that more often from now on? Also, I made a comment on your classification list. Also, first.--Thadeous Oakley 20:53, 26 August 2009 (BST) In other words, "first". --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 00:13, 27 August 2009 (BST) In other words, "second"--Thadeous Oakley 09:13, 27 August 2009 (BST) Don't get defensive on me, whiteboy. I couldn't care less about being on Bob's talk page. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 16:04, 27 August 2009 (BST) *word.xoxo 04:05, 27 August 2009 (BST) In other words, making sure your new siggy gets seen.--Thadeous Oakley 09:13, 27 August 2009 (BST) Nope. I use a templated sig so it's already on a wide array of pages, making new posts is entirely unnecessary. Good try though, you'll be a right cyberbob in no time at all.--xoxo 09:20, 27 August 2009 (BST) *~edgy as fuck~* Cyberbob  Talk  09:35, 27 August 2009 (BST) it's the substance abuse.xoxo 09:44, 27 August 2009 (BST) Other If you have a comment that doesn't fit into any of the above categories, put it here. Backstabbing I don't follow you. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 10:17, 29 August 2009 (BST) If you mean my view on the vote striking, I never said I thought what you did was right, hence why I tried to get you to distinguish between whether you thought it was MP or SP. We were both about to leave too, so we didn't have the time to argue over it. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 13:27, 29 August 2009 (BST) old friend? A user on irc by the name of threepage would like you to know that he said hi and that he's back. From experience, you will probably find him on IRC at random times during the day if you're interested. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 17:43, 7 September 2009 (BST) kay. Cyberbob  Talk  22:58, 7 September 2009 (BST) Told ya Stupidity/weirdness/drama would get worse. I'm Nostradamus bitches.--SirArgo Talk 00:49, 11 September 2009 (BST) Oh cummon. That's just like saying "It's be a full moon within the month". --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 00:51, 11 September 2009 (BST) Damn, that's a good prediction. But yes, I think most saw something weird a-coming.--SirArgo Talk 00:54, 11 September 2009 (BST) Yes, weird is a good word for what is going on at the moment. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 00:57, 11 September 2009 (BST) I think Grim's coup will be forgotten once this ends (new template opportunity for me). Simply because we may be dealing with a complete breach and abuse of the sysop system. The Nubis vigilante actions that were always borderline misconduct in particular.--SirArgo Talk 01:00, 11 September 2009 (BST) I don't think so- Grim's Coup was iconic of himself as the ruler of the wiki, and he earned his powers before he stomped everyone with them. Whatever Nubis had done would have been by cheating the system. Vandar already had an infiltrated account as a sysop before anyway. In fact, methinks "Nubis" just got bored of never achieving crat (so he could actually do the next coup) an just gave up ;D --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 01:04, 11 September 2009 (BST) Hmm. Very true. I guess not knowing exactly what things were like before all of this, I really can't make a clear judgment. I'm just flabbergasted that the account control lasted this long.--SirArgo Talk 01:17, 11 September 2009 (BST) I hope that's just a really bad joke because Nubis was not after a coup. Cyberbob  Talk  01:52, 11 September 2009 (BST) It sounds more like Nubis was making a statement on the whole "Trusted User" discussion that Grim created, which was months before the coup. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 01:55, 11 September 2009 (BST) Arbitration Has started. Please proceed here --Thadeous Oakley 23:33, 11 September 2009 (BST) Thanks On the TMS warrants page,Thanks for moving it dude. ;D lol i appreciate it--Suff-TMS- <-- Killin' zombies! 04:09, 12 September 2009 (BST) Another quetion When it comes to requesting a page move,... how easy is it for moderators to do them in bulk? I have a quite a few pages that really need to be moved from one category, to another. At that, if theres a way for moderators to do so in bulk, I'd prefer it to be done that way, instead of one by one the way I could do it. How's that sort of thing work? -Poodle of doom 03:14, 28 September 2009 (BST) Moving pages "in bulk" is no different to deleting a whole bunch "in bulk" - you do have to do them one at a time. It's still far easier (and better - you keep the page histories) to move them with the sysop function than by copypasting them across though. Cyberbob  Talk  03:18, 28 September 2009 (BST)