User talk:Misanthropy

Please post new comments at the bottom, using the highest-level header (=header name=).

I'll reply on your talk page if you contact me here.

Cheers.

For any users posting a sixth (or, indeed, seventh or beyond) topic on this page, full permission is granted to move the oldest topic in its entirety to the relevant archive.

Not that any of you will ever do it, but it's worth disclaimer-ing it to avoid unnecessary A/VB shitepipery.

heya, btw,

regarding A/VD, we don't usually bother putting 3 edit vandals on A/VD because it's more of a record keeping module for escalations, and since they've beat the ticker straight away, we don't really need to put them on there. Not to say you should take it off, it's k, just you don't need to :D --

 

 

 

 

01:48, 10 May 2010 (BST)

I'm just a little cautious about doing everything 100% by the book, in case I get stung by it two or three weeks later by someone looking to raise their profile before a re-evaluation in case I make a mistake. 02:12, 10 May 2010 (BST)

S'kool, on my first day as op I did the same thing for the same reason and boxy gave me the same speech I told you. THE CYCLE WORKS :D --

 

 

 

 

08:33, 10 May 2010 (BST)

If it helps you feel any better, I was waiting to see if DDR would comment on you putting the data on A/VD since I was curious which was the correct way. Although, had he not, I was just planning to do a text search of A/VD and visually confirm whether or not there were examples of banned users under the three-edit rule. —Aichon— 09:18, 10 May 2010 (BST)

ya. it looks like I just removed the edit at the time. So keeping it or removing it is right either way. --

 

 

 

 

08:11, 12 May 2010 (BST)

Vandalisms

Do you believe a checkuser between this user and the one you perma'd earlier is in order? Both were created around midnight, editted the same page (which one of them made), and accused each other of being the leader on it. I know it's pretty strawman, but should we do a checkuser, just to be sure?--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 16:08, 10 May 2010 (BST)

I always run a check user on anyone I ban, and the one I ran on Wesker showed nothing. You can double check it in case Vash was created afterwards but I don't think it was. 16:09, 10 May 2010 (BST)

Nah it wasn't. I assumed there would have been a check, but just wanted to make sure.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 16:14, 10 May 2010 (BST)

Checkuser all vandal users, those you suspect of sockpuppeting votes and anyone involved in a debate about how zerging is cool. You would be amazed how many of the latter have alternate accounts. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 16:29, 10 May 2010 (BST)

sigh

I never had any intention of winning, but I'm still disappointed in what both VVV and RHO are doing on your competition, cause (particularly VVV) isn't helping the actual cause of the comp at all... I would at leased ask that you visit the talk page of your competition and address or discuss my request to have the image rule removed or amended. At the moment its ended up in shitty image spam and little else. --

 

 

 

 

08:08, 12 May 2010 (BST)

Suggestion voting

I looked around the wiki, but couldn't find who is allowed to vote on suggestions. Thanks in advance if you can clarify for me. The Surreal McCoy 01:46, 13 May 2010 (BST)

*yoink* Anyone can vote on suggestions. The only places where voting is restricted is in regards to some of the admin pages (e.g. A/M and A/VB). —Aichon— 02:12, 13 May 2010 (BST)

Yep, like Aich said, any vote on the wiki except for Vandal Banning or Misconduct can be voted on by any member of the community. 12:58, 13 May 2010 (BST)

Thanks for the quick reply, I'll be reading all the suggestion rules and whatnot so perhaps I can join in. The Surreal McCoy 03:21, 18 May 2010 (BST)

Chomp

Thanks for the nibble. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 18:39, 19 May 2010 (BST)

Om nom nom. You taste terrible. 18:47, 19 May 2010 (BST)