UDWiki talk:Administration/Arbitration/NWO vs Cobra, Aichon and RadicalWhig
Headers (no, not those Headers, the other ones)
That page has just started, and already it has become a mess to navigate and edit. Would anyone mind if the various statements were turned into proper headers? (e.g., ===Happy 24 7's First Statement:===) -- Spiderzed█ 16:03, 13 September 2013 (BST)
- DT needs to give it the okay, but I'm definitely in support. I nearly did it myself yesterday. —Aichon— 16:18, 13 September 2013 (BST)
what a great way to cap off the summer!
Because Harrison | |
That's why. |
--User:Sexualharrison14:57, 15 September 2013
The Ruling
I don't mind restraints (it was what I was expecting), but they really need to receive a time limit. An arbitration ruling that effectively restrains the involved parties until the end of time isn't really valid. It are typically 1-3 months that such restraining rulings are held up, but YMMV. -- Spiderzed█ 23:54, 15 September 2013 (BST)
- I wanted something more interesting. Half way I stopped caring because of how the case was going. DT just ended up saying, I can't do shit about this. It's too bad we can't come to some kind of conclusion, Spider. Radical is still an attention whore. Still disappoint. At the same time, I'm sure Cobra(given its past drama - in the past lawl) or any other PKer group wouldn't want a page like BONWO and now it's clear that such pages can be made, thanks to Radical. NEVAR FORGET!!! -.- 00:05, 16 September 2013 (BST)
- The reason 'such pages' can be made is because they're not making up ridiculous shit about you to make you look bad. Everything on that page, aside from some commentary, was said by you. Had it all been outright slander, the precedent is that it should be moved to userspace. You brought this to arbitration, apparently without researching a damn thing, judging by your arguments, and this is the appropriate ruling. Had you done your research and developed a convincing argument beyond "this hurts my feelings", you would have stood a very good chance of swaying my decision. --DTPK 02:25, 16 September 2013 (BST)
The weird and wonderful moment when somebody stumbles upon the right decision by entirely ridiculous logic.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 02:14, 16 September 2013 (BST)
Radical's Final Response
First, I'd like to sincerely apologize to NWO from the bottom of my heart for me being AWESOME.
Now, onto wikibusiness. I am wikisuing Paynetrain for being wiki-lame-o.
NEW BARREL O' ARBITRATION: RadicalWhig vs Paynetwain MORTAL KOOOOOOMBAT
I want him to get the red out of his signature. It's Communist, don't you know. He must also do twenty laps around the nearest building, because spending that much time raging at the internets must build fat. I don't know, does it, Spainrain?
I also demand Pooptrain obtain a sense of humour at his soonest convenience. Humor. Humuor. Hummus. Whatever. You damn brits *shakes fist* His big mouth also poses a suction hazard- I move-seriously- that we direct all starships in the Sol system out of the Schwarzschild radius of that thing. Public safety, people. I even have proof! No wait, no I don't. I actually don't have evidence to back up this claim regarding NWO. FIRST TIME FOR EVERYTHING
Cryraine is going to scream and rage and cry and chuck swear words at me over this and in response, I'm going to just sit back with this big grin that makes you want to punch me and I'm going to cackle just a little. Life is great.
The rest of NWO:
CyberOpposition's Baghdad Bob impression is not at all convincing and I demand he stop it. It's pronounced “Cobrrra *mersinneries* are nowherrre in Krinksdahd”, man. Watch the videos again. “We never wanted Krinksdad anyways, it was a trap!”
Ayu's cool.
Jebdijed STILL hasn't been crucified for his devastating waste of wiki disk space that is his wiki promospam. I say we grab robes and pitchforks and get some old west justice in on this thing. Minus the part where his pardner shoots the rope at the last second and rides off into the sunset, two-on-a-horse.
In addition, I want radicalwhig-an analysis back on mainspace, because that shit is hilarious. I mean, I wouldn't trust Painfaint to display any kind of wit even if it would save my life, but I just guffawed and guffawed until something burst but it was worth it.
And finally, I also demand excalibur king of the swords, a fast horse by tomorrow midnight EST, and to make Pinhead look like a knuckle-dragging fascist moron whoops already done.
I will accept the following arbitrators:
User:DT, provided he is drunk or convincingly pretends to be drunk throughout the whole thing. THE WHOLE THING. Yes, even in IRC.
A jury of the sysops, provided they stack their bodies together to form a giant robot and collectively sign all posts as “Mecha-systron”
User:TripleU, same stipulations as DT above, except that he must get sloppy drunk. SLOPPY drunk. I'm talking more spelling mistakes than words here, people.
User:Axe Hack, provided he types entirely in death metal song titles or lyrics for several months, complete with death growls. Also while drunk. Why? Because it's awesome.
User:Urbandead ←Hasn't been on the wiki for yeeeeaaaars. The most impartial of everyone, ever.
User:penguinpyro ← who even is this guy?!??!
User:HK-50 ← robots, as completely unemotional beings are perfectly impartial!
User:MapBot ← ^^^ Even more so!!!!!11111
User:SailorSenshi ← Bhers are perfect for solving disputes between Pkers and idiots like Payne
Cutey Snugglekins ← Kawaiiness > everything. Do it.
User:DeRathi ← Even more kawaii! Sugoi desu and all that shit whatever
LET JUSTICE BE DONE. By ze power of WIKI LAW.
But for dead serious, I'm done now. From now on, I'm done with bothering you on the wiki, CyberOpp, as long as you simply leave me and my beef with your homeboy Pantstain alone. No more cheap shots at me, and I'm nobody to you. Or else I get my belt out again and the last three weeks repeats itself. But neither of us wants that do we?
Aaaaand you're probably not gonna accept. Ah well, I *was* looking forward to removing all my commentary and a few other bits from your and Ayu's BNWO quotes section *and* also never touching those sections again. No? Yes? Your call.
-- FoD PK Praise Rando!03:05, 16 September 2013 (BST)