UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Reevaluation for Bureaucrats

This line of A/BP will be changed to reflect the 8 months cycle.

said:

If, for any reason, an individual Bureaucrat position hasn't faced an election after 12 months, then an election is called after that period.

New Text would be

said:

If, for any reason, an individual Bureaucrat position hasn't faced an election after 8 months, then an election is called after that period.

Voting Section

Voting Rules

Votes must be numbered, signed, and timestamped. They can take one of two forms: # comments ~~~~ or # ~~~~ Votes that do not conform to the above will be struck by a sysop.

The only valid voting sections are For and Against. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

For

1. Author Vote - This just makes sense. --Karek^{maps 2.0?!} 15:30, 13 May 2011 (BST)
2. Down with the cats! Srsly, it would just get rid of a needless complication in the current system. --Oh, and vote on Project Funny, by the way. -- Spiderzed█ 15:39, 13 May 2011 (BST)
3. Makes sense. -- Cheese 15:49, 13 May 2011 (BST)
4. For. I also find DDR's point moot, as the current system supersedes A/RE anyway, why would an amended length not do the same? 19:28, 13 May 2011 (BST)
5. For - Fair enough.--Yonnua Koponen ^{T G P} ^^^ 21:03, 13 May 2011 (BST)
6. -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 02:44, 14 May 2011 (BST)

Against

incomplete. if said crat has not faced an election in 8 months they will find themselves up for evaluation as per A/RE policy. it should specify that an election will replace the A/RE evaluation, rather accompany it. -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 17:52, 13 May 2011 (BST)

That is actually already in the A/RE policy itself as documented on the talk page. --Karek^{maps 2.0?!} 21:17, 13 May 2011 (BST)

Right you are. -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 02:44, 14 May 2011 (BST)