User talk:Rasher

Banning

You recieved another warning for not holding to a arbitration ruling the edit in question.

seen your vandal banning data that means you are banned for a week.--Vista 16:30, 31 May 2006 (BST)

As you might have read, my banning of you was based an a misinterpretation of your arbitration case. I apologize for any inconvience it may have caused.--Vista 23:07, 3 June 2006 (BST)

Due to your continual bad faith edits, you've been banned for 2 days.--Vista ^W! 00:06, 21 May 2006 (BST)

Man, I hate the Dutch so much. Scinfaxi 17:51, 21 May 2006 (BST)

Warning

Do not continue to misuse or vandalise the vandal banning page, further misuse and vandalism could result in your loss of edit privileges--Vista ^W! 13:09, 14 May 2006 (BST)

The removal of your comments on the CDF talkpage were, considering your history with that group and certain users, justified. Your report of them clearly bad faith, the way you did so obviously vandalism. --Vista ^W! 18:20, 14 May 2006 (BST)

And even without your history, the removals were allowed. Read the policy documents concerning group pages. --Brizth ^{mod T W!} 18:31, 14 May 2006 (BST)

Template:GANKBUS

You said you changed your vote to "Delete". If you want it gone, change it to "Speedy Delete", as the author requesting the deletion of your own page, it WOULD meet the Speedy Deletion requirements and get deleted rather quickly. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 10:52, 9 May 2006 (BST)

Amazing Should not be a Moderator

Hello there. I believe Amazing's candidacy for moderator was already withdraw. Therefore, there is no more point adding votes against it. --hagnat ^talk 23:52, 2 April 2006 (BST)

Hey, fool

1. The General is not in CDF
2. The Gankbus blankings were because someone set up a reroute to your page from GANKBUS/old which I was attempting to remove. I restored the page myself.
3. You know both of these facts and are just being an idiot.

-- Amazing 00:37, 3 April 2006 (BST)

That's how a griefing PKer kiddie who abuses the Wiki, the game, and its users gets talked to. Besides, this is a talk page, not a main page. Gonna start whining about your own medicine now? -- Amazing 00:51, 3 April 2006 (BST)

Arbitration decided you are not allowed to make vandalistic edits to our page. We are not abusing the wki and this is in accordance to the rules. Personal attacks are not permitted in any page, including a talk section. Every further attack will be reported. Rasher 7:56 EST, 2 April 2006

Last time I checked arbitration said that abusive comments were to be removed and the page was to be put back to its original place. You were not given special rights whereby no one else is allowed to edit your page.--The General 21:46, 3 April 2006 (BST)

You're allowed to edit a page in good faith. Vandalism is not good faith. Rasher 21:57, 3 April 2006 (BST)

Good faith includes correcting incorrect information.--The General 23:14, 3 April 2006 (BST)

We provide specific links to every link of speculation regarding you and Amazing. Nothing on the list is false. Rasher 23:16, 3 April 2006 (BST)

I was actually reffering more to the reviver information than the speculation. I do however think it is drawing a major conclusion from a reletively small amount of evidence. Oh, and regarding the reviver information, I don't deny being near the revive point, I deny reviving anyone.--The General 23:22, 3 April 2006 (BST)

The factual correctness of this has been clarified, but Amazing is still vandalizing what we changed. Either way, indicating you are a "rezzer" is in NO WAY inflammatory despite its level of correctness. People view our page for more than what meets the eye. I did not indicate you in the next report of vandalism. If our allegations are true and you really are related to Amazing you may want to tell him to stop vandalizing discussion pages. Rasher 23:25, 3 April 2006 (BST)

Here's the proof that I am not a CDF "rezzer" aiders profile, I do not have the skills to revive someone.--The General 08:59, 4 April 2006 (BST)

Hay guys. I just wanted to know if you were recruiting? This whole "Amazing whine and cheese buffet" has given me the urge to jump on the gankbus--Mpaturet 00:15, 11 April 2006 (BST)

Well, it does attract idiots. -- Amazing 03:50, 11 April 2006 (BST)

HOP ON DA BUS!

Question

So what do you want from all this, anyway? I mean, you're a grown man acting like a little kid - Is there a reason for it?

I guess you'll just reply: "UR A DICK I KIL U BECAZ U R A DICK! LOL GIT ON DAGANKBUS!!!! LOLOLOL" or something similar.

Honestly though - Do you really have nothing better to do in life?

Do you hope to illicit some sort of threat of violence or mental breakdown? If so, you have a long wait. -- Amazing 01:57, 5 April 2006 (BST)

Well, I don't have anything better to do with my life, except masterbate. Scinfaxi 08:15, 14 April 2006 (BST)

Replies go below signatures. Mov'd -- Amazing 05:12, 17 April 2006 (BST)

Re:==You're my hero

Well, glad I could help, I guess. I primarily did it because a) I was bored and Amazing's "art" looks hella funny to begin with and b) because he said I couldn't pull it off. Guess I succeeded. --Lucero Capell 07:06, 16 April 2006 (BST)

Fatty fatty fat fat

I decided to steal what Scinfaxi said about me and see what the responce was. I see you think little of your own confidant's insults. -- Amazing 05:11, 17 April 2006 (BST)

Re: Proposal

I have moved your comment to the talk page and responded. --Prosperina I apologize for the misunderstanding concerning the GANKBUS page and have responded on the proposal page. I reiterate that it is in the interest of your group to participate and I would appreciate it if you participated especially since it seems that the petition to ban Amazing looks like it will fail. In order to address the concerns of your group, I would request your definitions and what you desire to be done concerning Amazing. If you wish all of his vandalism to stop, then perhaps you could give us your definition as to what constitutes as vandalism. If you find that the agreement would not be in your interest, you have the right to refuse, but in order to address your interests you first need to define what they are. -- Prosperina

We no longer edit Amazing's page (with the exception of pointing out obvious image leeching) regardless of whatever lies he perpetrates on them. We do not accept, in any way shape or form, his edits on ours, regardless of how he interprets arbitration rulings. Rasher 21:16, 24 April 2006 (BST)

I agree that it was inappropriate of him to do so and agree that you should not have accept his edits to your page. That is why I attempted to revert his edit and ask if he had an issue to take it to the proposal page. The proposal is an attempt to find a solution that will address everyone's interests and not just Amazing's.--Prosperina 23:15 24 April 2006

Actually, it's not inappropriate to enforce an arbitration decision. Please don't misunderstand - until this is resolved and agreed upon, this proposal doesn't undo previous arbitration decisions. -- Amazing 01:17, 25 April 2006 (BST)

I was not attempting to claim that the proposal in its current state undoes previous arbitration but, you should have still not edited it yourself rather referred it to your arbiter first. If you wish to show why the arbitration is not working for you and why you have troubles with it, you would have made less trouble for yourself. Nonetheless, whether the meaning of the arbitration was in your favor or against it, you should not have taken it into your own hands to edit it out. The meaning of the arbitration ruling is apparently in dispute, if you brought up the previous arbitration ruling and posted it on the arbitration page it would have been more constructive for you then going about it this way. As it is now due to the dispute, it would very arguably fall under vandalism whether or not you were justified in doing so. --Prosperina 1:32 24 April 2006

GANBUS arbitration

Amazing did take it to arbitration and I am enforcing the desicion.--The General ^{W! Mod} 22:36, 24 April 2006 (BST)

We can re-arbitrate what constitutes "offensive" then. Rasher 22:41, 24 April 2006 (BST)

Saying false things about his parentage is offensive. Anyway, precedent states that it is the arbitrator who desides what violates the desicion. But, I do agree tht this does need clarification, if only to ensure that everyone knows what would violate the desision.--The General ^{W! Mod} 22:49, 24 April 2006 (BST)

Do you deny that those describe amazing to perfection? Rasher 23:46, 24 April 2006 (BST)

No, I do not deny that. It is merely that they could be considered offensive. Anyway, i'm tired, i'll get back to you in the morning.--The General ^{W! Mod} 23:53, 24 April 2006 (BST)

Red goes faster

did you check your email? it was shaped like a sword. It was from pornobonanza@yahoo.com it was sweet. It had no letter "h" in it. It was in all caps. it was magical and perfect and impossible to replicate. -Banana¯\(o_º)/¯Bear

proof

Rasher 02:49, 8 May 2006 (BST)

Moderation

do not vandalize the Arbitration page. This is your first warning. --hagnat ^mod 18:15, 11 May 2006 (BST)

So what ? Those cases are still open to be arbitrated by the arbitration and moderation staff as we agreed when the deadline was placed. Even if those cases were solved, your edit was clearly on bad faith as the way you did it. Instead of serveral 'proof' you could just left a 'solved'. --hagnat ^mod 20:04, 11 May 2006 (BST)

Rasher. Warnings cannot be denied, declined, or in any way, shape, or form, made to not apply unless done so by a moderator. --Grim s-^Mod 20:12, 11 May 2006 (BST)

Unfortunately you cant. Nyah Nyah! --Grim s-^Mod 20:33, 11 May 2006 (BST)

Go ahead and deny infinity plus one, it bears no relevance to the matter at hand. AHA! --Grim s-^Mod 21:33, 11 May 2006 (BST)

Bear you motherbear Rasher 22:28, 11 May 2006 (BST)

hi. Vista banned himself to show you he is sorry for having banned you as he wrongly thought your wikigate ruling covered user talk pages. Vista will remain 24h banned, plus the time the server takes to auto-unban people (which will account for more or less than 36h). I just removed your latest Vandal Data report, so your next ban (if you ever get one) will be of 1 week, not a month. In the name of the Moderation Staff, i am sorry for all the trouble his ruling caused you. --hagnat ^mod 18:23, 2 June 2006 (BST)

Wikigate

Your wikigate case have come to a final ruling. Read it, and respect it. --hagnat ^mod 20:54, 16 May 2006 (BST)