Category talk:Historical Groups: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Malton College of Medicine: archived) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
#Groups must no longer actively contribute to the game. | #Groups must no longer actively contribute to the game. | ||
#A nomination should be made on [[Category talk:Historical Groups]]. | #A nomination should be made on [[Category talk:Historical Groups]]. | ||
# | #Voting will last for exactly two weeks following nomination. To be successful, a group must be approved by 2/3 of eligible voters to pass. A minimum of 15 votes must be cast for the vote to be valid. The only allowable votes are '''Yes''' and '''No'''. | ||
#Groups that pass will be added to the category as described below. | #Groups that pass will be added to the category as described below. | ||
#Groups must allow a week to pass between nominations. | #Groups must allow a week to pass between nominations. | ||
#Groups must allow 4 months in between when the group disbands and when they can be nominated for Historical Status. (Note: Only for [[Malton]]-based groups) | |||
|} | |} | ||
<br clear=both /> | <br clear=both /> | ||
=Nominations for Historical Status= | =Nominations for Historical Status= | ||
When nominating a group, please add a note to [[Template:Wiki News]] and add {{CodeInline|<nowiki>{{HistoricalGroupVoting}}</nowiki>}} to the top of the group's page. | When nominating a group, please add a note to [[Template:Wiki News]] and add {{CodeInline|<nowiki>{{HistoricalGroupVoting}}</nowiki>}} to the top of the group's page. Also, please add {{CodeInline|<nowiki>{{HistoricalVotingRules}}</nowiki>}} under the group's application for historical status. | ||
=New Nominations= | |||
==== | ==Recent Nominations== | ||
==[[East Becktown Defenders]]== | |||
{{HistoricalVotingRules}} | |||
# ''' | The East Becktown Defenders officially disbanded on [[EBD/Epitaph|May 1st, 2020]], which makes them eligible for Historical Group status. | ||
# | The EBD had been active since 2016, and included dozens of members, including both veterans and entire newbies. They maintained good relationships with survivor groups (including, but not limited to the DHPD, SoC, Knights Templar and the DEM) and zombie groups (specifically the Daubeney Resident Zombies next door, and of course our favourite frenemies in the RRF). | ||
# Yes, | Aside from regular survivor-style operations, they also brought a fun, no-pressure approach to the game, along with [[East_Becktown_Defenders/Tools|wiki-tools]] (like the automatic SitRep on their group page) and weird events (like the [[EBD_Stat_Party_2016|EBD StatParty]]). | ||
# | The group decided not to fade away like many others, but officially disbanded after exactly 4 years of activity. | ||
# | |||
# | === Yes === | ||
# | |||
# '''Yes''' - {{User:Peralta/Signature}} 13:29, 19 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
# '''Yes''' - [[User:Clayton Carmine|Clayton Carmine]] ([[User talk:Clayton Carmine|talk]]) 13:38, 19 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
# '''Yes''' - [[User:MicoolTNT|MicoolTNT]] 13:57, 19 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
# '''Yes''' - {{User:Stelar/sig}} 14:00, 19 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
# '''Yes''' - [[User:Roddy Winters|Roddy Winters]] ([[User talk:Roddy Winters|talk]]) 17:27, 19 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
# '''Yes''' - [[User:Matt Langley|Matt Langley]] ([[User talk:Matt Langley|talk]]) 18:13, 19 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
# '''Yes''' - [[User:Tarkenton|Tarkenton]] ([[User talk:Tarkenton|talk]]) 20:33, 19 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
# '''Yes''' - {{User:Bob Moncrief/Sig}} 23:17, 19 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
# '''Yes''' - [[User:Simcoe|Simcoe]] 07:00, 20 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
# '''Yes''' - [[User:Yo Ris|Yo Ris]] ([[User talk:Yo Ris|talk]]) 07:33, 20 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
# '''Yes''' - [[User:RaiNo|RaiNo]] 10:14, 21 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
# '''Yes''' - [[User:Frank Burn|Frank Burn]] ([[User talk:Frank Burn|talk]]) 13:46, 22 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
# '''Yes''' - [[User:DoXBr|DoXBr]] ([[User talk:DoXBr|talk]]) 14:19, 23 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
# '''Yes''' - [[User:Richardskull16|Richardskull16]] ([[User talk:Richardskull16|talk]]) 09:25, 24 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
# '''Yes''' - The Malton Globetrotters turbodunk the ayes! --{{User:Dragonshardz/dragonshardz}} {{Goonsig|Dragonshardz}} 00:58, 25 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
# '''Yes''' - {{User:Benigno/sig}} 16:57, 26 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
=== No === | |||
# | #I was going to go with “Who?” but [[Talk:East_Becktown_Defenders#Your_page|apparently we’ve spoken]]. As they did not fix their page in the entire 4 years they spent as a group, I cannot in good conscience vote for this group to be historical. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} {{Goonsig|Revenant}} 16:13, 20 August 2022 (UTC) | ||
#From what I see is a run-of-the-mill survivor group engaged in standard survivor play of maintaining a particular area. It was not innovative (like MCM or 404 were), it didn't have a distinctive style (like for example B.A.R. or ULC would have), nor was it involved in significant events (like Escape or c4NT were). --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">▋</span>]]</span>''' 20:34, 23 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
# | #As Spiderzed. Groups that had some members, did some things, and had a central pitch of being "well liked" didn't classify as historical when Urban Dead was bigger. I don't believe that should change for groups that existed during UD's [[Survivor-Zombie_Imbalance#7|long tail]]. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig5}} 05:55, 25 August 2022 (UTC) | ||
#As Spiderzed. --[[User:Papa John Schnatter|Papa John Schnatter]] ([[User talk:Papa John Schnatter|talk]]) 17:25, 25 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
# | |||
#'' | |||
# | |||
With voting well and truly finished, the East Becktown Defenders have become a '''historical group'''. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig5}} 07:53, 7 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
=Previous Discussions= | =Previous Discussions= | ||
| Line 58: | Line 64: | ||
==Voting Failed== | ==Voting Failed== | ||
{{ArchiveNoticeSmall|ArchiveName=FailedArchive}} | {{ArchiveNoticeSmall|ArchiveName=FailedArchive}} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:12, 8 September 2022
Obtaining Historical Status
A policy is in place which outlines the method to attain historical status.
|
Nominations for Historical Status
When nominating a group, please add a note to Template:Wiki News and add {{HistoricalGroupVoting}} to the top of the group's page. Also, please add {{HistoricalVotingRules}} under the group's application for historical status.
New Nominations
Recent Nominations
East Becktown Defenders
| Voting Rules |
Votes must be numbered, signed, and timestamped. They can take one of two forms:
Votes that do not conform to the above will be struck by a moderator. |
| The only valid voting sections are Yes and No. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote. |
The East Becktown Defenders officially disbanded on May 1st, 2020, which makes them eligible for Historical Group status. The EBD had been active since 2016, and included dozens of members, including both veterans and entire newbies. They maintained good relationships with survivor groups (including, but not limited to the DHPD, SoC, Knights Templar and the DEM) and zombie groups (specifically the Daubeney Resident Zombies next door, and of course our favourite frenemies in the RRF). Aside from regular survivor-style operations, they also brought a fun, no-pressure approach to the game, along with wiki-tools (like the automatic SitRep on their group page) and weird events (like the EBD StatParty). The group decided not to fade away like many others, but officially disbanded after exactly 4 years of activity.
Yes
- Yes - PB&J 13:29, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yes - Clayton Carmine (talk) 13:38, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yes - MicoolTNT 13:57, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yes - stelar Talk|MCM|EBD|Scourge 14:00, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yes - Roddy Winters (talk) 17:27, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yes - Matt Langley (talk) 18:13, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yes - Tarkenton (talk) 20:33, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yes - Bob Moncrief EBD•W! 23:17, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yes - Simcoe 07:00, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yes - Yo Ris (talk) 07:33, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yes - RaiNo 10:14, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yes - Frank Burn (talk) 13:46, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yes - DoXBr (talk) 14:19, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yes - Richardskull16 (talk) 09:25, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yes - The Malton Globetrotters turbodunk the ayes! --【ⅎooɹd ǝʌɐɥ ᴉ sʇɐoƃ sʍoʅʚ ⅎǝᴉɹɔuoɯ uǝɹɐʞ】 ☉
☉ 
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 00:58, 25 August 2022 (UTC) - Yes - Benigno SSZ RCC 16:57, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
No
- I was going to go with “Who?” but apparently we’ve spoken. As they did not fix their page in the entire 4 years they spent as a group, I cannot in good conscience vote for this group to be historical. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 16:13, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- From what I see is a run-of-the-mill survivor group engaged in standard survivor play of maintaining a particular area. It was not innovative (like MCM or 404 were), it didn't have a distinctive style (like for example B.A.R. or ULC would have), nor was it involved in significant events (like Escape or c4NT were). -- Spiderzed▋ 20:34, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
- As Spiderzed. Groups that had some members, did some things, and had a central pitch of being "well liked" didn't classify as historical when Urban Dead was bigger. I don't believe that should change for groups that existed during UD's long tail. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION 05:55, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
- As Spiderzed. --Papa John Schnatter (talk) 17:25, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
With voting well and truly finished, the East Becktown Defenders have become a historical group. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION 07:53, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Previous Discussions
There are 3 archives for this page.
General Discussion
 |
Things Best Forgotten |
| This Category talk page has an archive. |
Voting Succeeded
|
Things Best Forgotten |
| This Category talk page has an archive. |
Voting Failed
|
Things Best Forgotten |
| This Category talk page has an archive. |
