UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Archive/2009 06
Speedy Deletions Archive | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is the archive page for UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions.
Speedy Deletion Queue
Criteria 1 & 2
--Cyberbob 07:01, 6 June 2009 (BST)
Random Stuff
- Template:BuildingStatusDisambig - Newly redundant template, no longer in use.
- Template:Nation infobox - Looks useless, is unused.
- Template:- - Used only by the useless template above.
- Take Back - Seemingly abandoned 'cade plan tests.
- St Seraphim’s Hospital - Dupe of St Seraphim's Hospital. (NB: Both are redirects) Note the different apostrophes. The former one isn't needed as a search term.
-- RoosterDragon 21:09, 5 June 2009 (BST)
- Done all but Take Back - it doesn't fall under a traditional criterion, so I'm just going to leave it here for a few days to see if anyone objects to it's deletion. However, it is old and quite useless, so I can't see any objections. Linkthewindow Talk 04:28, 6 June 2009 (BST)
Served Speedy Deletions
Talk:Suggestions/17th-Jan-2007
Talk:Suggestions/17th-Jan-2007 - an old talk:suggestions page overflow. I've moved most of the content to User talk:Boxy/Suggestions/See Barricades, all that's left is the last section -- boxy talk • teh rulz 02:35 5 June 2009 (BST)
- Oh, actually it's not an overflow, but the talk page associated with Suggestions/17th-Jan-2007 from the old system... still, all suggestions on that page were removed (for one reason or another), so it's probably a crit 1 or something -- boxy talk • teh rulz 02:40 5 June 2009 (BST)
- Hmm. I'm not so familiar with the old suggestions system... Are you asking we delete the talk page for a suggestion article under Crit 1, because you copied the contents (which was 95% your content) into your user namespace? Because at the moment I'm not comfortable deleting it, particularly because the talk page's contents are directly moved from the article itself and therefore cited on there. Meaning, if we deleted it, the main article would have no link to the contents it once had. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 16:08, 5 June 2009 (BST)
- OK, withdrawn -- boxy talk • teh rulz 00:30 6 June 2009 (BST)
Criterion 7
Fun concept but I quickly lost interest. --Cyberbob 15:56, 5 June 2009 (BST)
- Has so much potential... I wish you'd or someone else would pick it up sometime in the future. Done. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 16:00, 5 June 2009 (BST)
Image:Zeddance.jpg
See below - it doesn't show up on Firefox. Linkthewindow Talk 12:45, 4 June 2009 (BST)
Broken images
Neither of these show up on my browser. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 06:09, 4 June 2009 (BST)
- Done. Linkthewindow Talk 12:45, 4 June 2009 (BST)
Miscellaneous Redirects
The following are all unused.
- St Ansgar's
- 26-10
- The Style building
- Category:Alliance of Giddings
- Guides:More Bang For Your (AP) Buck
- St edith's church
- 5punk pub crawl
- Drzy
- Hindmarsh
- Talk:Moderation/Arbitration/Archive1
-- RoosterDragon 18:03, 1 June 2009 (BST)
- I left a couple of the location ones which may be used as a search tag at some point... I am going to ark all such unused redirects in a future project, so they won't be considered for deletion in the future. hopefully. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 16:33, 2 June 2009 (BST)
Stanbury Village Hospitals
Crit 1. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 14:09, 1 June 2009 (BST)
--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 14:28, 1 June 2009 (BST)
From Special:Unused Templates
Went through some of the unused templates and picked out the ones I'm 99% sure are safe to delete.
- Template:Awesome Signal - Userbox. No links, last edit 21 Mar 09.
- Template:BigPrickMap/Target - Formatting. No links, last edit 12 May 08.
- Go ahead and kill this one. The Big Prick doesn't use it. Asheets 16:42, 27 May 2009 (BST)
- Template:BigPrickMap/Target - Formatting. One link, here, last edit 31 Oct 08.
- Go ahead and kill this one. The Big Prick doesn't use it. Asheets 16:42, 27 May 2009 (BST)
- Template:BrainstockGMod - Userbox. No links, last edit 30 Jul 08.
- Template:CSSpicerHillsTable - Formatting. No links, last edit 22 Feb 09.
Template:ComradeOfTalunex - Group Affliation Image. No links, created/last edit 23 Dec 08.- Template:Controlled - Groupbox. One link, here, where Gnome has noted the template was removed since it was inappropriately placed, last edit 30 Jul 08.
- Template:DailyTasks - Wall of Text. 1 link from A/D. Previously kept on A/D (Jan/08) 'for historical purposes' but has not since been linked to or used.
- Template:FreeBeer - Userbox. No links, last edit 29 Jan 09.
- Template:Feral Undead Whittenside Barricade Plan - Cade Plan for Zombies provided by the Committee of The Bleeding Obvious. No links, last edit 6 Aug 08.
- Template:HB - Formatting. No links, last edit 9 May 09.
Template:Infirmary - Unused blocking template. No links, last edit 22 Nov 06.Template:InfluenceMapColors/Allied - Formatting. One link, last edit 2 Mar 08.Template:Influencemap - Map. One link, last edit 21 Aug 08.- Template:Info MIB - Text. No links, last edit 17 Feb 09.
- Template:LB - Formatting. No links, last edit 9 May 09.
- Template:LosHombresSiniestros - Group Affliation Box. No links, last edit 29 Apr 09.
Template:Love goolina - Redirects to duped content.- Template:MOBMap - Map. One link, last edit 21 Sep 08.
- Template:NULL - Formatting. No links, last edit 9 May 09.
- Template:Nts2nic - Deprecated Text. No links, last edit 27 Jun 08.
- Template:PD Status Map - Unused Map. No links, last edit 29 May 07.
Template:PrickSuburb - Image. One link, last edit 24 Apr 08.- Go ahead and kill this one. The Big Prick doesn't use it, as we don't stay in 'burbs that long. Asheets 16:41, 27 May 2009 (BST)
- Template:Protectorate - Groupbox. One link, here, where Gnome has noted the template was removed since it was inappriopiately placed, last edit 1 Aug 08.
- Template:RAZI - Group Affliation Box. No links, last edit 28 Feb 09.
- Template:Revenge - Group Affliation Box. Two links from previous A/SD where it failed for being included at the time. Last edit 26 Dec 08.
- Template:Ruined - Formatting. No links, last edit 9 May 09.
- Template:SFCP - Group Affliation Box. No links, last edit 8 Jan 09.
- Template:Saromu is Devil (improved) - Userbox. One link, last edit 10 Jul 08.
- Template:Spam page Box-thing. One link from a MR on 28 Dec 08. Last edit 1 Aug 08.
Template:Speedydelete12 - Won't be needing this anymore.- Template:Stargate Atlantis Fan - Userbox. No links, last edit 9 Aug 08.
- Template:Template-stack - Utility Template. No links, last edit 19 Oct 08.
- Template:TemplatePage - Box-thing. No links, last edit 8 Dec 07.
- Template:TheGhostTownRevivificationProjectSmall - Groupbox. No links, last edit 29 Mar 08.
- Template:Ud-css-form.a - Formatting. No links, last edit 21 Sep 08.
- Template:User:G-Man/Navbar - Unused nav bar in wrong namespace anyway, last edit 22 Dec 08.
- Template:VSB - Formatting. One unrealted link to A/SD (same name, different content), last edit 9 May 09.
- Template:Waterhole - Groupbox. No links, last edit 5 Nov 07.
Additionally, this page:
- XXXX - Was a placeholder link way back when so incomplete location blocks could be tracked, thus no longer needed. Content is duped.
Man this wiki sure does accumulate junk. -- RoosterDragon 17:50, 24 May 2009 (BST)
- For the templates that have like under 5 links, if possible I would suggest copying the code onto the pages directly. That way they don't lose the design, but it doesn't waste resources/space by having a template. After that the template should be deleted if it isn't needed. That's what I did when I organized the templates last time. --– Nubis NWO 01:32, 25 May 2009 (BST)
Did we not undelete the crit 12 template? Oh yes, we did. Therefore you can have a keep on this entry until someone arks the various ones that are important. Seriously, disk space = cheep. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 02:19, 25 May 2009 (BST)
- I struck the Crit 12 Template, and when I have the time I'll continue to check the other templates at your request. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 01:36, 26 May 2009 (BST)
Just had a quick look through them now. A fair bit of it seems to be the usual useless junk that the wiki accumulates. A few of note (some which should be saved, IMO.)
- Template:ComradeOfTalunex is kind of like the ZPOV templates on deletions a while ago - the template isn't used, the image is specifically in place of the template it seems
- Template:Love goolina should go, or at least be replaced with a redirect (which would quickly be deleted anyway.)
Not too sure about Template:PD Status Map - it isn't actively being edited, but it could be quite useful if someone wants to put a bit of effort into it. So a keep on it for now.- Similar to the Talunex one above, Template:PrickSuburb isn't used, the image appears to be used in it's place.
Again, I'm voting keep on Template:DailyTasks for now - it could be potentially useful, although I won't be surprised if it's a dupe- Template:Infirmary is duped in function by Template:CreedyNW and Template:PerrynW
- Template:Influencemap should potentially be kept - it may be useful as a subst: template (see: MOB,) hence why it isn't showing up as being included in some pages
- Ditto for Template:InfluenceMapColors/Allied
That's it - most of the rest is useless groupbox templates and old bits of code.
For the record, the old Crit 12 template was undeleted for historical interest - I'll include on a sandbox page now so this mistake doesn't happen again. Linkthewindow Talk 11:38, 26 May 2009 (BST)
- Template:DailyTasks is outdated and is only a record of how to cycle the old suggestions system, it currently serves no utility beyond 'historical interest' which it was kept for in a previous vote. It's here because it wasn't used or linked to otherwise, thus I doubted anybody actually cared. Same for the crit12 template. If people don't mind orphaned & unused stuff floating about in the netherworld, so be it. Takes up the same disk space deleted or not after all.
- The PD Status Map is an unfinished relic, it takes after the old method used for the NT Status Map & co. Hell I could knock up a new style one at some point. But I assure you there's nothing there worth keeping right now. That reminds me, the entire User:PoliceScanner namespace can be shafted at some point too.
- I struck the IM. -- RoosterDragon 13:40, 26 May 2009 (BST)
- Thanks, and point taken on both of those. A PD Status Map is a bit pointless anyway. Linkthewindow Talk 13:43, 26 May 2009 (BST)
- They were all unused, I distilled the list, various people have looked over them, whoever deletes them will double check the links anyway, and if anything somehow slips through that, we have the magic of Undeletions. -- RoosterDragon 11:34, 1 June 2009 (BST)
- Alright. The only thing stopping me is that last distilled list by Link. Did you actually strike the ones you want to keep? I just need to make sure. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 12:27, 1 June 2009 (BST)
- In the original list, any keeps (3) have been struck. -- RoosterDragon 12:31, 1 June 2009 (BST)
- Confirming. Linkthewindow Talk 12:31, 1 June 2009 (BST)
- Yes... But in links list under it. The keeps are the unstruck ones? DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 12:34, 1 June 2009 (BST)
- Yes DDR. The struck ones on my list are keeps. Linkthewindow Talk 12:35, 1 June 2009 (BST)
- In the original list, any keeps (3) have been struck. -- RoosterDragon 12:31, 1 June 2009 (BST)
- Alright. The only thing stopping me is that last distilled list by Link. Did you actually strike the ones you want to keep? I just need to make sure. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 12:27, 1 June 2009 (BST)
- They were all unused, I distilled the list, various people have looked over them, whoever deletes them will double check the links anyway, and if anything somehow slips through that, we have the magic of Undeletions. -- RoosterDragon 11:34, 1 June 2009 (BST)
Done - I've nuked all of them except for Cyberbob's Sonny template, which I noticed was linked as a historical item on his user page. I'd rather have him say it's alright before we delete it. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 13:09, 1 June 2009 (BST)
- Why not Template:Love goolina? No-one's expressed any objection to it going, and it's a simple redirect. I'll do it by morning if none complains. Linkthewindow Talk 13:13, 1 June 2009 (BST)
Somewhere else
Crit one, only four words. Linkthewindow Talk 08:00, 1 June 2009 (BST)
- Done. It was young, but given that the only links were from Template:NWnews and A sarcastic speech by Grim in 2007, both serving as an example link, this page was technically just a dupe (in practice) of Example page. Hence, no need for it. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 08:19, 1 June 2009 (BST)
Ballsy McRockschwitz
Crit 9--Orange Talk 02:09, 1 June 2009 (BST)
- Keep - I'm putting a move request for this before we delete it. He's put some work into this page. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 02:19, 1 June 2009 (BST)
Scheduled deletion (unused redirect resulting from move, user page redirect.) Linkthewindow Talk 07:48, 1 June 2009 (BST)