User talk:Cyberbob240/Classifications: Difference between revisions
(→Update) |
|||
(24 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
Line 92: | Line 92: | ||
Ahh well, I guess that was expected. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 13:43, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | Ahh well, I guess that was expected. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 13:43, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
:I tried to come up with something else for you but that whole feud thing the two Umbrellas have going on just screams Net Rat on both sides. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 20:34, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | :I tried to come up with something else for you but that whole feud thing the two Umbrellas have going on just screams Net Rat on both sides. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 20:34, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
::That was what, late 08 and early 09? Poor excuse D: Besides, that past affair screams [http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/duelists.htm duelists] more then anything else. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 21:23, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::I'm slow okay. I'll probably give you Duelists next time I get around to updating it. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 21:55, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
Eagle scout? I dun geddit. :( {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 20:36, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | Eagle scout? I dun geddit. :( {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 20:36, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
:idk I just give it to people who don't get into much drama usually {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 20:57, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
::Nevermind, I just realised there was a site you linked to explaining it. Makes more sense now. [[Image:Tongue.gif]] {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 20:59, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
Ha! Very apt with me. Nicely done, Cyberbob.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 20:53, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | Ha! Very apt with me. Nicely done, Cyberbob.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 20:53, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Ha, I thought of you and then I thought of that business with Iscariot and just went Yes. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 20:57, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
I just now became aware of this page and was surprised (and somewhat honored, I guess) to see that I was on it at all, given how infrequently you and I bump into each other. Lurker, eh? Well, could've been worse. I suppose the one time I stepped into any drama recently was with ZL around New Year's, and that's about the only time you would've ever seen me in drama, so Lurker seems perfectly reasonable, coming from you. Though I would definitely disagree with the idea of not involving myself in normal discourse. Granted, I've been slow in becoming a regular at the admin pages (I'm still not a regular there), but I've been active in most of the other places around the wiki for a few months now, and you'll be seeing more of me around the admin pages as time goes on, I'm sure. I wanted to get a feel for the place before wading in deeper, and I feel more comfortable around those parts of the wiki at this point. | |||
Personally, Philosopher struck a chord with me when it mentioned "ponderous and lengthy cogitations". As SA can attest, I'm not exactly great at keeping things brief. Even so, I'm not convinced it's a perfect fit for me, since I wouldn't say I have the breadth of knowledge it describes (does that make me a Profundus Maximus?). That said, I do like to think I'm slow to anger and considerate of others' opinions, and I definitely don't see a point in scheming or complicating things when directly approaching someone is the easiest way to deal with it. | |||
Anyway, cool page. I'm glad I saw a link to it and will definitely be checking in on it whenever it gets updated. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 05:11, 13 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
:I'm pretty lazy (I don't bother doing any research) and I couldn't remember seeing you around all that often off the top of my head - at least not enough to comfortably give you much else. Next time things'll probably be different. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 06:16, 13 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
I made the list BITCHES! --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 05:16, 13 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
:I think you were on it before, I just took you off for some reason {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 06:16, 13 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
:Congratulations. *cough ego cough* --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 06:55, 13 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
I don't know if I would celebrate about being called a "Net Rat" --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 06:47, 13 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
==Awesome== | |||
I even get one without a request. Am I just that awesome?--{{User:Drawde/Sig}} 19:59, 23 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
:Guess so :D --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 20:01, 23 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
==What's the point?== | |||
What's the point of the classifications, and how did I get on your list? Is it a good or bad thing that I'm there?? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 03:19, 27 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
:The point is "for fun", you're on my list because you edit a lot and popped into my mind as a person worth having on the list, and it's neither a good thing nor a bad thing that you're on it. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 03:58, 27 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
::Why newbie then? I guess that's what I'm ultimatly getting at... Especially if I "edit a lot..." -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 04:34, 27 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::There's no real rhyme or reason to my selections... I just sort of look down the list and choose one on the spot for each person. I do update it from time to time if I think I made the wrong choice for someone. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 04:54, 27 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
==Update fool.== | |||
I demand entertainment. In the short to medium term. --[[User:Rosslessness|Ross]]<sup>[[User:Rosslessness/Battle of Tebbett|less]]</sup>[[User:Rosslessness|ness]] 21:16, 27 June 2012 (BST) | |||
:ditto--{{User:Sexualharrison/sig}}<small>22:45, 27 June 2012 </small> | |||
::I suggest Ross makes his own version of this list as he retires from being a 'crat, as celebration for his time as one. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 23:03, 5 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::YES please {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/a}} 04:01, 6 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
yeah ok let me just go through a year and a half of wiki history and find all the new kids on the block and figure out who they all are and where they fit in and also how the old faces might have changed from a year and a half ago. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:17, 19 June 2013 (BST) | |||
:You mean you haven't been lurking and keeping up to date this entire time? What have you been doing? {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 14:31, 19 June 2013 (BST) | |||
::the exact opposite of UDWiki {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 15:59, 19 June 2013 (BST) | |||
:::Hmm...good call. I think I might have to give that a try at some point. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 16:55, 19 June 2013 (BST) | |||
At the end of 2013 I'll list all sysops in order of sexual prowess. --[[User:Rosslessness|<span style="color: MidnightBlue ">R</span><span style="color: Navy">o</span><span style="color: DarkBlue">s</span><span style="color: MediumBlue">s</span><span style="color: RoyalBlue"></span>]][[User_Talk:Rosslessness|<span style="color: RoyalBlue">l</span><span style="color: CornflowerBlue">e</span><span style="color: SkyBlue">s</span><span style="color: LightskyBlue">s</span>]][[User:Rosslessness/Safehouse_Hatred|<span style="color: LightBlue">n</span><span style="color: PowderBlue">e</span>]][[Monroeville Many|<span style="color: PaleTurquoise">s</span>]][[Location Page Building Toolkit|<span style="color: PaleTurquoise">s</span>]] 16:41, 19 June 2013 (BST) |
Latest revision as of 15:55, 19 June 2013
User talk:Cyberbob/Classifications
SuggestionsAny suggestions for the list go here. My SuggestionThough I'm still not happy with Net rat, this is something else; He's been here a while now, and with that recent "Conn Butt Cover" move of him, I simply , though sincerely, demand that Giles Sednik get's a place on teh list. Now I will leave it up to you and other to determine what he is as flamewarrior. I honestly wouldn't know myself, that, and I'm lazy.--Thadeous Oakley 21:00, 26 August 2009 (BST) I disagree with your choice.--xoxo 04:36, 27 August 2009 (BST)
Hurm. I was hoping to land somewhere around lamer or nitpick or tireless rebutter. But you gave me the lonely guy title? I'm butt hurt about this and you can bet I'll even the score. >:-( --GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 07:38, 28 August 2009 (BST) CommentsAny commentary on the list goes here. Nice.Whoever wrote this is surprisingly perceptive. I always like it when people can be nicely categorised. Some of your choices were a bit hit and miss but some were spot on :P I know none of them are gonna be perfect, but i have ever used the "no sense of humour" argument? --xoxo 12:28, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
I think i win as having the most different classes. 4 by my count.--xoxo 17:47, 29 June 2009 (BST)
F^32You give the guy up there the evil clown class and I get the yuk yuk. You'll pay.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 12:35, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
AwwI'm not on here. :'( -- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 00:51, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
I don't get an allowance :( and i have a relatively minute music collection. I like the bit about vague existential arguments though. --xoxo 07:57, 6 June 2009 (BST)
Net RatI'm too old. --Thadeous Oakley 22:16, 24 June 2009 (BST)
Bout timeAnd here i was thinking you were still bitter at my promotion thus outlasting my bitterness by almost 2 months! --xoxo 04:34, 27 August 2009 (BST)
AwwwI feel left out --DOWN WITH THE 'CRATS!!! | Join Nod!!! 08:53, 27 August 2009 (BST)
Flagbox For YouRan across this while fixing up the flagboxes, it seemed most apt.
-- RoosterDragon 16:37, 29 August 2009 (BST)
UpdateEver going to get one?-- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 12:22, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Dawwwwwwww, I'm such a cute wittle kitteh.-- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 13:31, 11 January 2010 (UTC) Ahh well, I guess that was expected. --Thadeous Oakley 13:43, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Eagle scout? I dun geddit. :( 20:36, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Ha! Very apt with me. Nicely done, Cyberbob.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 20:53, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
I just now became aware of this page and was surprised (and somewhat honored, I guess) to see that I was on it at all, given how infrequently you and I bump into each other. Lurker, eh? Well, could've been worse. I suppose the one time I stepped into any drama recently was with ZL around New Year's, and that's about the only time you would've ever seen me in drama, so Lurker seems perfectly reasonable, coming from you. Though I would definitely disagree with the idea of not involving myself in normal discourse. Granted, I've been slow in becoming a regular at the admin pages (I'm still not a regular there), but I've been active in most of the other places around the wiki for a few months now, and you'll be seeing more of me around the admin pages as time goes on, I'm sure. I wanted to get a feel for the place before wading in deeper, and I feel more comfortable around those parts of the wiki at this point. Personally, Philosopher struck a chord with me when it mentioned "ponderous and lengthy cogitations". As SA can attest, I'm not exactly great at keeping things brief. Even so, I'm not convinced it's a perfect fit for me, since I wouldn't say I have the breadth of knowledge it describes (does that make me a Profundus Maximus?). That said, I do like to think I'm slow to anger and considerate of others' opinions, and I definitely don't see a point in scheming or complicating things when directly approaching someone is the easiest way to deal with it. Anyway, cool page. I'm glad I saw a link to it and will definitely be checking in on it whenever it gets updated. —Aichon— 05:11, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
I made the list BITCHES! --Haliman - Talk 05:16, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
AwesomeI even get one without a request. Am I just that awesome?-- Adward 19:59, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
What's the point?What's the point of the classifications, and how did I get on your list? Is it a good or bad thing that I'm there?? -Poodle of DoomM! T 03:19, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Update fool.I demand entertainment. In the short to medium term. --Rosslessness 21:16, 27 June 2012 (BST)
yeah ok let me just go through a year and a half of wiki history and find all the new kids on the block and figure out who they all are and where they fit in and also how the old faces might have changed from a year and a half ago. Cyberbob Talk 13:17, 19 June 2013 (BST)
At the end of 2013 I'll list all sysops in order of sexual prowess. --Rosslessness 16:41, 19 June 2013 (BST) |