Suggestion:20090409 ...Another zombie

	Dupe
	This suggestion has been found to be a dupe of Suggestion:20070910_Attack_Another_Zombie. Dupes are easily found by searching for them in the main and suggestion namespaces.

20090409 ...Another zombie

Red Hawk One 22:19, 9 April 2009 (BST)

Suggestion type
New dropdown menu option

Suggestion scope
Most interactions with zombies

Suggestion description
When you open a dropdown menu (attack, DNA scan, etc.), there will be a new option: another zombie. When this option is chosen, your character will ignore the last zombie he or she interacted with and will interact with the next zombie in the stack. This would allow zombie hunters to weaken a group of zombies for their friends (at the cost of lower damage to each one) and more importantly help scientists to get out of the cycle where they are stuck scanning the same zombie over and over. This would not ruin zombie anonymity- while survivors may not recognize each individual zombie, they would realize when they are attacking someone different.

Voting Section

Voting Rules

Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped. # justification ~~~~ Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

Keep Votes

1. Keep - Author vote. I do NOT enjoy wasting AP scanning the same zombie in a mob repeatedly.--Red Hawk One 22:22, 9 April 2009 (BST)

Kill Votes

1. Kill - Author's own justification for keep vote is a pretty solid argument for a kill in my book. --Johnny Bass 22:31, 9 April 2009 (BST)
2. Kill - If you get stuck scanning the same zombie repeatedly, it means that all the zombies in the area are already scanned, and you wont get XP for scanning "... another zombie" anyway. The only use for it then is so that you can bypass zombie anonymity, and re-scan the whole pile to find the profiles of every zombie there. That, and getting HP down on all zombies in a building so that someone else can come in and kill/dump the lot in a matter of minutes to avoid ?risers -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 02:10 10 April 2009 (BST)

Spam/Dupe Votes

1. Dupe - I'm fairly certain this is one, though I don't have the time to search for a link at the moment. --Midianian^{¦T¦DS¦SP¦} 22:32, 9 April 2009 (BST)
2. Dupe? Suggestion:20070910_Attack_Another_Zombie. --Janus ^talk 22:43, 9 April 2009 (BST)
3. Dupe - As Janus. --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 23:05, 9 April 2009 (BST)
4. Dupe - Yup, it's a dupe --Stepdown 23:33, 9 April 2009 (BST)
5. Dupe - --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 01:05, 10 April 2009 (BST)
6. Dupe - As above. Would have been Spam otherwise. --Papa Moloch 02:19, 10 April 2009 (BST)
7. Dupe - As above. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 02:57, 10 April 2009 (BST)