Talk:Previous Days Suggestions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Where did the February 2007 Suggestions Go?

I was about to take a stab at moving these to the proper categories, and they vanished. Is this work already done? Aren't they archived anywhere by month, like the January 200& and previous suggestions? --S.WiersctdpNTmapx:oo 22:36, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

I guess I beat you to it. It would be great if you could help me out in putting the closed suggestions in the proper places (Peer Reviewed, Rejected, etc.). --ZombieSlay3rSig.png 22:43, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Wiki Bots

I know it's possible to make wiki bots, as there are several doing things like fixing double redirects on Wikipedia; does anyone have the programming skills and wiki know-how to make a bot to move suggestins automatically once their time here is up?--'STER 01:27, 24 Nov 2005 (GMT)

One of the problems with this (it was discussed in the main suggestions page) is where to put the cutoff of whether an idea is put into Peer Reviewed, Rejected, or Undecided, and program the bot as such. --Lord Kelvin 21:16, 25 Nov 2005 (CST)

This page is getting longer and longer each day. Why dont we create a monthly Previous Day, like, creating Previous Days Suggestions\2005\December, and then send all december suggestions there ? In this page there will be only left the days that are still open, and links to the monthly previous day (that could be, then, protected against editing.) --hagnat 14:10, 29 Jan 2006 (GMT)

I was going to suggest that, myself. I'm all for it :) -pinkgothic 19:16, 13 Feb 2006 (GMT)
I not only thought of doing it myself as well, but i actually went ahead and did it. Enjoy. Due to multiple people cycling off the suggestions in their own way, i would appreciate it if someone went back and standardised them. Possibly leave them as a single asterisk in front of the suggestions name as it requires fewer keystrokes. --Grim s 03:49, 4 March 2006 (GMT)
Standardised. I changed them all to a single asterisk in front of the suggestion's name, as you suggested.--The General 20:58, 4 March 2006 (GMT)

Lack of updates on this page

I closed the votes from the 9th to the 18th of January. We dump the main votes here, but don't take care of this page.--Scorpius 00:36, 2 Feb 2006 (GMT)

I closed Jan. 19 - 24. --CPQD 16:38, 9 Feb 2006 (GMT)

I'm probably going to close January 25th to a few others. Their voting has ended 20 days ago! There has been votes since... Should I revert the page to how it was the 8th of February? --McArrowni W! 17:00, 28 February 2006 (GMT)

Go ahead and revert back to the day they closed voting. --Grim s 03:49, 4 March 2006 (GMT)
When people say they closed them does that mean that they have moved the suggestions into peer reviewed, peer rejected, or undecided (whichevers appropriate). I need to know this so that I know where to start from when I move them.--The General 13:13, 4 March 2006 (GMT)
I don't know. I think it would be best if we had a list on what days suggestions have been processed. I know that the peer rejected suggestions weren't sorted until I went through them all (well I haven't started on April). Also the undecided suggestions haven't been sorted either. Presumably there are some peer accepted suggestions that haven't made it through either. But the main problem is the sheer quantity of suggestions that are made. Usualy it's at least 5 a day now, but it use to be like 10 or 15 which was ridiculous for only one person to do and so they just gave up. Either way it's a massive back log that I only got through because I designed a program to help. But I only moved the peer rejected because it was the section most in need. But I'm going to start on the undecided soon for the months before April. I would release my program to the wider community however it can crash if it doesn't have the right kind of input (Damn those old suggestions broke those templates badly) and it's not very user friendly either.
So in short just start from April and I'll handle the rest. Although I guess that this reply is 2 months late, so that just shows how little people care about the previous day suggestions. - Jedaz 11:46, 28 April 2006 (BST)
Ok, i'll get right on it. Could you send me a copy of your program, even if you don't release it to the wider community, I don't mind if it crashes?--The General W! Mod 17:54, 28 April 2006 (BST)
Yep can do, actualy I'll release it onto the wiki (because I should be able to), but I'll have a note saying that it's still a work in progress. But first I'll make it a little more user friendly... - Jedaz 06:40, 30 April 2006 (BST)

table of contents

i just moved the table of contents to the right of the page. it seems better this way, since now there is some text on the left, so people can just read through it ignoring the TOC. If anyone doesnt like this change, just remove the table with the __TOC__ call from the page. --hagnat tw 00:37, 14 April 2006 (BST)

It's not bad as of such, but I think we should have the TOC on the left side (personal opinion) I'll have a little fiddle with it mabey... - Jedaz 11:57, 14 April 2006 (BST)

Processed suggestions

Ok, I'm creating a page for a list of all of the days of the processed suggestions. This means all of the days with suggestions that have been fully processed will be on this page (sorted into catorgorys of fully processed or not of course). This is just more for keeping track of what has been done so people don't go over things twice. The link is here Processed Days - Jedaz 08:23, 5 May 2006 (BST)

October 27th

Quick thing guys, the suggestions for October 27th havent yet been sorted into Peer Reviewed/Undecided/Rejected yet, even though the voting has been over for about half a week. I'd take care of it myself, but I'm not too sure on how to move everything. Can someone please take care of it? Thanks. --GhostStalker 20:23, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Done. Patience is a virtue. August didn't get processed till October, for example. --Funt Solo 13:00, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Cycling

Woah. There's an entire list of April '07s to cycle. Anyone up for the challenge? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 18:31, 16 July 2007 (BST)

I cycled remains of february, whole march and part of april back in may - you can see it from pages' histories. So, to be concrete, i took a bigger challenge and made most of it and this is just the remains. well, maybe i'll get to cycle them too, but if someone (you?) will get to them first - i wouldn't mind --Duke GarlandTLCD SSZ 20:56, 16 July 2007 (BST)
Trust me...I cycled much of January and December(?)...or was it just January? I don't remember...but cycling them took me 2 weeks about. And you can tell...I don't want to bother with that again... --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 02:56, 17 July 2007 (BST)
One of April's (Toolkit Revision 1) got implemented (Toolbox) with slight changes (it was 10% enc' in suggestion), although Aprils are still not cycled --~~~~T''' 12:43, 19 August 2007 (BST)
Someone has to bite the bullet and cycle them. It's obviously not going to me considering last time... insanity FTW! - If Jedaz = 13:33, 19 August 2007 (BST) then pi = 3