UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/MrAushvitz vs Gage
MrAushvitz vs Gage
dont know what's happening between this two, but by reading MrA talk page one can clearly notice Gage moking MrA for his ban, and following insults on every single edit on MrA's talk page. As a former arbitrator, i request someone to take this case, and just rule Gage away from MrA talk page, and from commenting on MrA suggestions (voting 'for' and 'against' should be allowed). --overlord hagnat mod 04:00, 30 August 2006 (BST)
- Hagnat, are you allowed to start an arbitration case that neither party requested? –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 04:02, 30 August 2006 (BST)
- I offically deny this request. Oh, and don't forget: Gold Blade, Axe Hack, CaptainM and Bob Hammero (he called him an idiot on several occasions - rightly so).--∴Gage 04:09, 30 August 2006 (BST)
WTF? Are you high? Why the hell do you care? You can't force someone (in this case Aushvitz) to prosecute someone on arbys. And this already went as a "no" on M/VB. --Gold Blade Hunt! 17:36, 31 August 2006 (BST)
| The "List" (feel free to add yourself!)
VS --∴Gage 05:05, 30 August 2006 (BST) |
No. We are not having another Wikigate. Furthermore, I am dismissing this case. If MrAushvitz or Gage wants to start up a case, they are free to do so. Otherwise, there is no reason for us to be discussing this here. –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 05:11, 30 August 2006 (BST)
- First of all, this was not supposed to look like wikigate. It was just MrA against Gage, since he is the one who is most harrassing MrA. Second, i opened this arbitration case because MrA request it via email, in order to keep his user talk page free from the constant mokery of his own situation. Since we have a new protection guideline on the way, i believe there will be no more cases were a user is banned and those who dont like him flood its uset talk page with nonsense and mokery. Anyway, since you didnt like this idea, bob, we can wait for MrA return to reopen this case, and make sure Gage stay away from MrA talk page (and suggestions). --overlord hagnat mod 04:00, 1 September 2006 (BST)
- I fully intend to respect his "ban" of me from his talk page, even though there is so much precedent of that being ignored, but I refuse to quit spamming his retarded suggestions. They suck.--∴Gage 04:19, 1 September 2006 (BST)
- I want a copy of that email. Prove this. --Gold Blade Hunt! 22:22, 1 September 2006 (BST)
- I wouldn't mind a copy myself.--∴Gage 22:25, 1 September 2006 (BST)
- That sounds fine, Hagnat. I'm just very reluctant to set precedent of one user starting an arbitration case between two different users. I'm sure you can see the potential problems that would result from that. (E.g., I suddenly decide that I don't like the way you and Grim s talk, so I start a case between the two of you.) –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 22:42, 1 September 2006 (BST)
- That is my problem. Why don't we postpone this until MrA can tell us publicly that he wants this. Also, you failed to prove us of vandalizing MrA's talk page and then start this almost 15 minutes later. I might be imagining things, but that seems rather suspicous. --Gold Blade Hunt! 22:48, 1 September 2006 (BST)
- If ol' MrA did email you, hagnat, can we get a screenshot of the email around here? --Axe Hack 22:52, 1 September 2006 (BST)
- What the--- fuck off, i dont have to show anyone personal emails to 'prove' a thing for you guys. And failure to prove vandalism on MrA talk page ? PLEASE! The entire page SCREAMS with vandalism made by Gage and Co. --overlord hagnat mod 19:11, 2 September 2006 (BST)
- If ol' MrA did email you, hagnat, can we get a screenshot of the email around here? --Axe Hack 22:52, 1 September 2006 (BST)
- That is my problem. Why don't we postpone this until MrA can tell us publicly that he wants this. Also, you failed to prove us of vandalizing MrA's talk page and then start this almost 15 minutes later. I might be imagining things, but that seems rather suspicous. --Gold Blade Hunt! 22:48, 1 September 2006 (BST)
