UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Austin/2007-11-25 Promotion

Administration » Sysop Archives » Austin » 2007-11-25 Promotion

This page is an archive of Austin's Promotions candidacy, which was withdrawn. If you wish to speak with this candidate, please use their Talk page.

Austin

Hello fellow wiki members,I have been on this wiki (And other wikis) for over 2 months now. I desire to become a system operator. I have made over 500 edits/contributions to this wiki and like to be a pillar of wikipedian community. The reason I think i can become a system operator is for the numerous good edits/contributions I have made one of them can be found here if you see me being polite and editing with true news that is an example of my edits. I wish not to exacerbate the wiki but to make it a friendly place open for good people to contribute there work. I desire to be a system operator and help and contribute to this wiki.Your friend, austin

1. Against - We know absolutely nothing about you, and as far as i have been able to determine, you have shown absolutely no prior interest in maintaining the community. The entirety of your edits are on your userpages and groupages, as well as the sandbox. You fail to meet the criteria for promotions, and should withdraw this bid. --The Grimch ^{U! E! WAT!} 17:01, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
2. Againgst - While you may have made a good start as it where, this is realy not enougth to justify your promotion. As grim has said you realy haven't met any of the criteria nessicary for promotion. Actions speak louder than words. Prove your interests and aptitude for maintaining the community and come back in a few months. Maybe then.--Seventythree^Talk 17:05, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

You and grim have been very polite.--Austin 18:14, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

1. Strongly Against - As Grim, and I really don't feel like getting banned by some pissed off kid who carries a grudge because his secret vandal identity was found out.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 17:06, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
2. Against - Sorry, but you haven't really met the criteria. Only a few have been met and the ones that you have are dubious at best.--  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 17:14, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
3. Strongly Against - you couldn't even manage to get your promotion bid on the correct header level, how can you expect us to trust you with sysop powers ? --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 17:20, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
4. Against - Less than 200 edits, no proof of prior interest in maintaining the community. You need many more months and contributions to community pages before trying to make Sysop status. Sorry but no. --Matthew Fahrenheit ^YRC☺T☺+1 17:38, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
5. Strongly Opposed - 1) You haven't been here two months. 2) You haven't made 500 edits. 3) You haven't been friendly or helpful, as evidenced by your little Attack Template 4) You are a sockpuppet account of banned user Ahrimmagicks, and thus shouldn't really be here at all. --Pavluk ^{A! E!} 17:46, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
6. Against - As above, sorry. Less than two weeks, less than 200 edits = less than sysop material. And if you are a ban workaround, putting yourself up for a promo bid wasn't a terribly good way to stay under the radar. -- Atticus Rex ^{mfu pif} Δ 18:19, 25 November 2007 (UTC)