UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Nubis/2006-04-26 Promotion

Administration » Sysop Archives » Nubis » 2006-04-26 Promotion

This page is an archive of Nubis's Promotions candidacy. If you wish to speak with this candidate, please use their Talk page. If you believe that the candidate has abused the abilities and privileges granted them by this promotion, please report them for misconduct.

Nubis

I would like to nominate Nubis. Looking over his track record, and judging by his honesty, I think he would makea good moderator. His stance on moderation and arbitration versus a ban list make him a good candidate for a wiki style moderator. --ERNesbitt 17:13, 26 April 2006 (BST)

• I will vouch for this user. --ERNesbitt 17:13, 26 April 2006 (BST)
• Vouch - He has a tendancy to annoy me by standing against me when I'm wrong...mark of an unbiased person. He's also one of them typo-correcting freaks. --Sirens^{T RR} 19:45, 26 April 2006 (BST)
• Vouch - now will you stop asking me to do it in the IRC ? --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 19:47, 26 April 2006 (BST) ^{(serious, i think he would do great as a mod)}
• Vouch - I will vouch for this user. --Swmono ^{talk - W! - SGP} 14:54, 26 April 2006 (EST)
• Vouch - Oink oink oink oink oink.--Jorm 20:15, 26 April 2006 (BST)
  • Further oinkage: oink oink oink oink oink oink oink oink oink oink oink. --Jorm 07:28, 5 May 2006 (BST)
• Vouch - Nubis spelled backwards is Sibun. -Banana Bear4 20:30, 26 April 2006 (BST)
• Vouch - You bet. Petrosjko 03:12, 27 April 2006 (BST)
• Vouch - haet Nubis --Undeadinator 03:45, 27 April 2006 (BST)
• Vouch - I need not post reasons. I am doing nothing unethical. This vote was not bought with gold in the basket. Continue about your business. --Lucero Capell 05:30, 27 April 2006 (BST)
• Vouch - I am willing to vouch for this... wait a minute... As a moderator of the Wiki I suppose I'd do all sorts of modly things, such as conspiring against the lowly peons, subtly manipulating NPOV sections and causing arguments against me to mysteriously disappear. On a more serious note, I suppose I'd do things like race against Grim and Zar to see who can ban PQN the most, enforce Arbitration rulings and judge Vandal Banning cases, as well as the occasional delete and speedy delete fun. That's all I can really think of to say at the moment, but I will answer questions as they come. In layman's terms, I accept this nomination. – Nubis ^NWO 05:58, 27 April 2006 (BST)
• Against - Fails to meet criterion 3: Prior interest in maintaining the community. I have yet to see him take an interest in maintaining the wiki. --Grim s-^Mod 05:52, 28 April 2006 (BST) Edit - It also appears he doesnt have the required 500 edits. --Grim s-^Mod 12:10, 28 April 2006 (BST)

417 edits starting from march 18, same point as were my contributions list suddenly goes wanky (550 edits after march 18, 15 before) as does yours too, (rougly 1200 edits after march 18 - 42 before, impressive numbers though...) It's the march purge.--Vista ^W! 12:21, 28 April 2006 (BST)

Fair enough. Forgot about the history purge. --Grim s-^Mod 02:07, 29 April 2006 (BST)

• Against - For the exact same reasons as Grim. EDIT: Minus the part about the 500 edits. --Cyberbob240^{CDF - Arb - W!} 12:16, 28 April 2006 (BST) Vouch On fourteenth thought, I change my mind. --Cyberbob240^{CDF - Arb - W!} 07:23, 5 May 2006 (BST)
• Vouch - He seems like a good choice--Bermudez 17:29, 29 April 2006 (BST)
• Vouch - I vouch him:].--Changchad 17:44, 29 April 2006 (BST)
• Vouch - Can't be worse than most of the current ones. -- Amazing 07:14, 30 April 2006 (BST)
• Vouch - I think he will do quite nicely. --John Rove 23:09, 30 April 2006 (BST)
• Yea - --Brizth ^{mod T W!} 10:25, 5 May 2006 (BST)
• Vouch - He's a good guy. Saromu 23:10, 6 May 2006 (BST)
• Vouch - After looking into his last lot of edits, it's pretty clear that Nubis is a good contributor, and overall helpful and nice guy. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 05:24, 7 May 2006 (BST)
• Vouch - Impressed by his maintenance of the suggestions page, specifically removing suggestions properly --xbehave 00:18, 9 May 2006 (BST)