User talk:DangerReport/Brooksville

<a href="http://s25.photobucket.com/albums/c89/IAMOJF/?action=view&current=Brookstone.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c89/IAMOJF/Brookstone.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a> Again proof. Vandalize again and you'll be reported. Sonny Corleone ^{WTF RRF ASS} 14:51, 29 July 2006 (BST)

Number of zombies in the above screen captures = 0

Once I regenerate AP, I'm going to get my own screen captures. Then I'm going to change the danger level back to an appropriate level again. Then you can report me for Vandalism. We can both make our case to an arbitrator, if you'd like. I'm setting danger levels in suburbs that I am operating in, and have first hand knowledge of. --Kiki Lottaboobs 00:46, 31 July 2006 (BST)

Kiki, no offense, but you're an idiot. No offense though. Read Very Dangerous. "150+ zombies or open buildings." Seriously. Sonny Corleone ^{WTF RRF ASS} 01:08, 31 July 2006 (BST)

You know what, I just died because all of the buildings were OVER barricaded. I even got twice as many screen captures for the whole world to examine. Check it out:

And while I'm sure you're pleased to see me dead, you'll have to admit now, that I've provided twice as much data as you have. You'll also need to recognize that the highest concentrations of zombies in any of these pictures is 8. You fail. --Kiki Lottaboobs 03:26, 31 July 2006 (BST)

Holy unintelligent being,Batman! You have proved that you are too incompetent to use the wiki. If you took screenshots indoors we would see if they were barricade strafed. Because barricade strafes do not count. If so then Ridleybank would change color for 5 hours once a week. We get barricade strafed and right after we tear them down. Does that mean it isn't Very Dangerous? Nobody is there to defend it. It's just an empty shell. Sonny Corleone ^{WTF RRF ASS} 03:30, 31 July 2006 (BST)

It doesn't matter whether anyone's there to defend it if there's nobody there to attack it. Zombies aren't going to be retaking Brooksville in five hours. --Censustaker 03:46, 31 July 2006 (BST)

I find it positively amusing that you choose to censor the DEMON logo and text box in all of the images. Except one. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 03:37, 31 July 2006 (BST)

Suburb Danger Level Colors
	Safe Structurally intact and inhabited by survivors, with numerous lit buildings, and few to no zombies.		Moderately Dangerous Active zombies and break-ins, but no major hordes.
	Intact Structurally intact with few zombies, but a very low survivor population and few to no lit buildings.		Dangerous Zombies inside many resource buildings and/or significant hostile mobs.
	A Ghost Town Mostly or entirely ruined, and devoid of significant survivor or zombie populations.		Very Dangerous Most buildings wide open or zombie-infested and/or massive hostile zombie mobs.
Suburbs listed in boldface contain notable locations, groups, or events. Factors beyond the scope of this map may affect the situation on the ground.

Ok - where up on that little chart does it say anything about barricades being manned? Your own screenshots have shown no zeds in buildings - hers have shown few zombies on the street. This has no relation to Ridleybank. There is NO evidence to support the claim of VeryDangerous. --Darth Sensitive ^W! 03:41, 31 July 2006 (BST)

Show me on the little chart where it says suburbs are safe when they are devoid of humans. Sonny Corleone ^{WTF RRF ASS} 03:44, 31 July 2006 (BST)

Show us on the little chart where it says suburbs are dangerous when they're devoid of humans? Surely an empty, barricaded ghost town fits "Break-ins rare, no zombie groups." rather than "Most buildings wide open or zombie-infested; or hostile zombie mobs of 150+" --Censustaker 03:46, 31 July 2006 (BST)

But breakins aren't rare. They happen each day. A zombie breaks in, sees no harmanz, and then leaves. Then Kiki runs in barricade strafing like a little ballerina and posts on the wiki how safe it is. I will admit, it is safe...as long as you're not sleeping there. Sonny Corleone ^{WTF RRF ASS} 03:51, 31 July 2006 (BST)

As it stands, it doesn't matter about humans. It's zeds and building status that counts If you want it to be different, go to the suburb talk page and work on changing definitions. Zombies who break in and then leave pretty much fits "Active zombies and break-ins", but not "Most buildings wide open or zombie-infested". --Darth Sensitive ^W! 03:55, 31 July 2006 (BST)

Break-ins happen every day in every suburb, so long as there are a couple of zombies around to attack a barricade; I'd love to see what your definition of "rare" is. If a suburb only has a couple of buildings cracked per day, then the majority of survivors in that suburb won't be found and, as you say, this is safe. --Censustaker 04:05, 31 July 2006 (BST)

I'd like to say that I will no longer update Suburb Danger Reports. Why? Survivors feel the need to lie about suburbs. If it is Very Dangerous then they say it's Moderate. Dangerous and it's Safe. So from now on I will allow them to lie. Why? This helps the zombie cause. For every survivor they get down there thinking it is safe is another survivor embracing BARHAH. So thank you Kiki, Darth Sensitive, and the rest of the MFD. You are Death Cultists without even knowing about it. Sonny Corleone ^{WTF RRF ASS} 04:33, 31 July 2006 (BST)

Ring ding! Thanks for letting us take a crack at it. Have a pleasant evening. --Kiki Lottaboobs 07:01, 31 July 2006 (BST)

So thank you Kiki, Darth Sensitive, and the rest of the MFD. You are Death Cultists without even knowing about it.""

Ahem, that's Kiki, Darth Sensitive, and the rest of the DEM. You are Truth-Telling Death Cultists without even knowing about it. We will continue to update the danger reports to the TRUE meanings of them, regardless of how the RRF feels that it, along with the Big Bash, has claimed every suburb permanently. --Chief Inspector 20m813 (MPD) 23:33, 31 July 2006 (BST)

Hey - don't go grouping me with the MPD/DEM. I'm part of the better police department, the DHPD. :::Grins::: --Darth Sensitive ^W! 23:51, 31 July 2006 (BST)

Oh, terribly sorry, Darth Sensitive. I suppose I haven't been reading up too much about you. Well, suppose you're living up to your name, eh? :::Grins Back::: --Chief Inspector 20m813 (MPD) 02:09, 1 August 2006 (BST)