User talk:Revenant/Sysop?
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
This space intentionally left blank
SA
Don't do it Rev! The wiki is a demon that will eat your soul!!--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 03:33, 12 June 2009 (BST)
- The power of Cthulhu compels you! ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 03:53, 12 June 2009 (BST)
- EEEAAAAARRRGGGHH IT BURNSES US!--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 04:00, 12 June 2009 (BST)
- And this is another reason I like you Rev. You aren't mean and removing my comment. :D --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 04:10, 12 June 2009 (BST)
- Burns? Oh, hells, did I use the flamethrower instead of the tentacle gun again? Dreadfully sorry, it's something of a favourite. >:D ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 04:14, 12 June 2009 (BST)
- EEEAAAAARRRGGGHH IT BURNSES US!--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 04:00, 12 June 2009 (BST)
- Take it away! It's disgusting! DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 05:36, 12 June 2009 (BST)
- Meh -- boxy talk • teh rulz 14:46 3 December 2009 (BST)
To make a comment
Simply edit this page.
Thats all well and good
But what have you done lately? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 15:40, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- He's actually me. I've done a little bit of work with SA, but I'm too lazy to edit with my Revenant account.-- SA 01:36, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Talk me through this, it intrigues me.
Revenant said: |
*Character Page Names Policy
Users should own the wiki page names for their characters without having to create new accounts. The character exists as a game object so is valid for documentation in the main namespace. |
--RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 21:48, 8 July 2010 (BST)
- Same here. What stops someone creating a character called "Militant Order of Barhah", overwrites the page, and messing things up for the group? It's a very fine line to deal with, as is your other proposal, but I like your tentative ideas for a civility policy.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:04, 8 July 2010 (BST)
- It's called a hatnote or disambiguation page, people. Standard good editing judgement still applies, same as always. If someone were to create a such a character and attempt to use it as you describe, it would be hard for it to not be done in bad faith. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 05:06, 9 July 2010 (BST)
- Alright, this makes sense, but for more obvious examples, would it be possible to naturally go to the most obvious, and have a "such and such redirects here, for this, go here" message, like on wikipedia, rather than a disambig?--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 07:30, 9 July 2010 (BST)
- It's called a hatnote or disambiguation page, people. Standard good editing judgement still applies, same as always. If someone were to create a such a character and attempt to use it as you describe, it would be hard for it to not be done in bad faith. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 05:06, 9 July 2010 (BST)
UDWiki:Specific Case Editing Guidelines#Group Pages |
While the rest of the page is allowed to be as biased and full of propaganda as the group wishes, the top section (known as the "definitional section", or "introduction"), must be written from a Neutral Point of View, ie a view that does not forward any particular agenda. |
- Ok, I could probably get behind this. It would obviously mean the removal of crit 9, so that would need to be covered in the policy. Also, I take it redirects would be allowed?--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 14:27, 9 July 2010 (BST)
- Hell yase. Everything Is Notable. This is not the fricking Wikipedia, here. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 03:57, 10 July 2010 (BST)
- I'd advise making pages of this nature into redirects where possible, or possibly setting up a Character: namespace if at all possible.
01:11, 11 July 2010 (BST)
- I for one like this idea. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 03:55, 29 March 2011 (BST)
- I'd advise making pages of this nature into redirects where possible, or possibly setting up a Character: namespace if at all possible.
- Hell yase. Everything Is Notable. This is not the fricking Wikipedia, here. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 03:57, 10 July 2010 (BST)
- Ok, I could probably get behind this. It would obviously mean the removal of crit 9, so that would need to be covered in the policy. Also, I take it redirects would be allowed?--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 14:27, 9 July 2010 (BST)