Suggestion:20090623 new class:builder/plumber

	Spam!
	This suggestion was voted as spam and closed for voting, with 0 keep, 2 kill, and 8 spam votes.

20090623 new class:builder/plumber

Zagert 22:20, 23 June 2009 (BST)

Suggestion type
New class

Suggestion scope
Choosing a class

Suggestion description
A new class called Builder or Plumber the class starts with a toolbox/a length of pipe (or maybe one of both) and the skill construction

this class will count as a member of the civilian class, the name sums up the class. The startup message could be like "You are a hard working builder/plumber that did not evacuate, during the early outbreaks you hid. After a while your supplies begin to dwindle and now you must leave from your safehouse to loot for essentials." This class will allow new players to barricade and repair any empty houses they find making their first few days in the game much easier.

Voting Section

Voting Rules

Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped. # justification ~~~~ Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

Keep Votes

Kill Votes

1. Zergtastic As Link. Only I kill.--Thadeous Oakley 23:18, 23 June 2009 (BST)
2. Kill - Zerg issues. Plus it would be really hard to gain XP with this class. It would end up as a zerg tool for both Pro-Survivors AND Death Cultist type over-cading of entry points. DS is a good place to hang out and test the waters on ideas, as long as you can put up with the gaggle of Trolls in there.--
   
   | T | BALLS! | 04:31 24 June 2009

Spam/Dupe Votes

1. Spam - would result in excessive zerging as people can spawn characters that start with construction and can be used as barricade bots. Likewise for the toolbox idea - people can spawn, suicide repair, die, and then forget about the alt. Pretty sure it's a dupe too, but my search-fu isn't strong in the morning. Linkthewindow  Talk  22:39, 23 June 2009 (BST)
2. Spam - Link channeled most of my rant. All except for PLEASE use Developing Suggestions in the future. This could have been fixed and discussed there, but instead you just threw it out here.--SirArgo ^Talk 23:06, 23 June 2009 (BST)
3. Spam - As above. DS or die. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 01:41, 24 June 2009 (BST)
4. Spam - yeah baby! -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 01:43 24 June 2009 (BST)
5. Spamazerg - ZERGRUSH. No but seriously. Can't say enough, is liek teh awsum! -- T^HEL^ORDG^UNS^LINGER 05:28, 24 June 2009 (BST)
6. Zergaspam - Zerging should never, ever be a viable option. Making it easier is incredibly stupid. --Blake Firedancer ^{T E RNL? P.I.S.I.T.} 09:03, 24 June 2009 (BST)
7. Spam - even without the zerg issue, this is overwhelming overpowered. --WanYao 18:50, 24 June 2009 (BST)
8. Spam - And I think I'll have some Spam with my Spam, Spam, Spam and Spam. --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 02:32, 25 June 2009 (BST)