UDWiki talk:Administration/Arbitration/Cheveyo vs Rosslessness: Difference between revisions
Billy Forks (talk | contribs) |
Billy Forks (talk | contribs) (→Chev's initial argument: sig) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
Cheveyo ignored this, preferring ''ad hominem'' attacks. | Cheveyo ignored this, preferring ''ad hominem'' attacks. | ||
There is now evidence that he's still in the area, still putting up the same graffiti. Yesterday I resprayed our hospital with one of our recruiting tags, and today it's gone again: http://iamscott.net/1264408603864.html. The accusation is even worded the same as in his broadcast from Woodroffe Mall: http://img44.imageshack.us/i/whatisthisbr.jpg/ . Cheveyo is still in the area: http://iamscott.net/1264408944836.html | There is now evidence that he's still in the area, still putting up the same graffiti. Yesterday I resprayed our hospital with one of our recruiting tags, and today it's gone again: http://iamscott.net/1264408603864.html. The accusation is even worded the same as in his broadcast from Woodroffe Mall: http://img44.imageshack.us/i/whatisthisbr.jpg/ . Cheveyo is still in the area: http://iamscott.net/1264408944836.html | ||
[[User:Billy Forks|Billy Forks]] 09:04, 25 January 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:04, 25 January 2010
Zerg
I'm willing to bet Ross is right... -Poodle of DoomM! T 03:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
From Talk:Arbies
This will be an interesting case. Both sides seem to accuse the other of zerging--which is certainly an issue that will make it very difficult to find an un-biased arbitor for. --Maverick Talk - OBR 404 09:56, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- You don't need to find an unbiased arbiter. Just one that they both agree to. Big difference. ;) —Aichon— 14:43, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- Personally, I think if you want an unbiased arbitrator, you need to pick a volunteer at random, who has no invested interest in the wiki,... by that I mean, someone who's not directly involved, or doesn't seek to benifit from the politics revolving around the case, or wiki.... -Poodle of DoomM! T 01:16, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Chev's initial argument
He's boned. --
07:35, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yap. While I get some popcorn, did Ross ever even use any profanity or a hostile tone? Sure, confirmed zergs/cheats deserve it, but with Cheveyo being less-than-totally-confirmed I like how Ross stayed classy. At least, I can't see or remember anything unclassy. Other people, yeah, but that's not part of this case. Heh. --Bob Boberton TF / DW 08:12, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
- Bob pretty much said it. -- Adward 15:26, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
He's lying in his initial argument, I believe. When he says the zerg-accusation graffiti is nothing to do with him, that's a lie. I posted some circumstantial evidence on Hmm:talk:
Billy Forks said: |
The evidence that you are responsible for the graffiti slandering Ross is circumstantial, but strong:
|
Cheveyo ignored this, preferring ad hominem attacks. There is now evidence that he's still in the area, still putting up the same graffiti. Yesterday I resprayed our hospital with one of our recruiting tags, and today it's gone again: http://iamscott.net/1264408603864.html. The accusation is even worded the same as in his broadcast from Woodroffe Mall: http://img44.imageshack.us/i/whatisthisbr.jpg/ . Cheveyo is still in the area: http://iamscott.net/1264408944836.html Billy Forks 09:04, 25 January 2010 (UTC)