UDWiki talk:Administration/Arbitration/Cheveyo vs Rosslessness: Difference between revisions
Billy Forks (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:Yap. While I get some popcorn, did Ross ever even use any profanity or a hostile tone? Sure, confirmed zergs/cheats deserve it, but with Cheveyo being less-than-totally-confirmed I like how Ross stayed classy. At least, I can't see or remember anything unclassy. Other people, yeah, but that's not part of this case. Heh. --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' [[Image:Littlemudkipsig.gif]] 08:12, 24 January 2010 (UTC) | :Yap. While I get some popcorn, did Ross ever even use any profanity or a hostile tone? Sure, confirmed zergs/cheats deserve it, but with Cheveyo being less-than-totally-confirmed I like how Ross stayed classy. At least, I can't see or remember anything unclassy. Other people, yeah, but that's not part of this case. Heh. --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' [[Image:Littlemudkipsig.gif]] 08:12, 24 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Bob pretty much said it. --{{User:Drawde/Sig}} 15:26, 24 January 2010 (UTC) | ::Bob pretty much said it. --{{User:Drawde/Sig}} 15:26, 24 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
He's lying in his initial argument, I believe. When he says the zerg-accusation graffiti is nothing to do with him, that's a lie. I posted some circumstantial evidence on Hmm:talk: | |||
{{divquote|Billy Forks|The evidence that you are responsible for the graffiti slandering Ross is circumstantial, but strong: | |||
* You had a quarrel with him over some other issue in some other suburb. | |||
* The graffiti specifies Ross, not by the name of his SFH alt, but as you've interacted with him before. | |||
* It started appearing at the same moment you arrived - your introductory post on the Knights Templar board saying 'lets attack SFHNAS' was 6th Jan., pretty much the same time as the graffiti started. (plus or minus a day or two, but we've never had zerging accusations sprayed round K'bank in the SFHNAS's 1.5-year history.) | |||
* You have a record of accusing people of zerging whenever you fight against them - Angels of Mercy, penguinpyro. | |||
* The graffiti contains... wait for it... your fingerprint ellipses: http://iamscott.net/1263988553566.html and http://iamscott.net/1263840501883.html.}} | |||
Cheveyo ignored this, preferring ''ad hominem'' attacks. | |||
There is now evidence that he's still in the area, still putting up the same graffiti. Yesterday I resprayed our hospital with one of our recruiting tags, and today it's gone again: http://iamscott.net/1264408603864.html. The accusation is even worded the same as in his broadcast from Woodroffe Mall: http://img44.imageshack.us/i/whatisthisbr.jpg/ . Cheveyo is still in the area: http://iamscott.net/1264408944836.html |
Revision as of 09:04, 25 January 2010
Zerg
I'm willing to bet Ross is right... -Poodle of DoomM! T 03:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
From Talk:Arbies
This will be an interesting case. Both sides seem to accuse the other of zerging--which is certainly an issue that will make it very difficult to find an un-biased arbitor for. --Maverick Talk - OBR 404 09:56, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- You don't need to find an unbiased arbiter. Just one that they both agree to. Big difference. ;) —Aichon— 14:43, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- Personally, I think if you want an unbiased arbitrator, you need to pick a volunteer at random, who has no invested interest in the wiki,... by that I mean, someone who's not directly involved, or doesn't seek to benifit from the politics revolving around the case, or wiki.... -Poodle of DoomM! T 01:16, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Chev's initial argument
He's boned. --
07:35, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yap. While I get some popcorn, did Ross ever even use any profanity or a hostile tone? Sure, confirmed zergs/cheats deserve it, but with Cheveyo being less-than-totally-confirmed I like how Ross stayed classy. At least, I can't see or remember anything unclassy. Other people, yeah, but that's not part of this case. Heh. --Bob Boberton TF / DW 08:12, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
- Bob pretty much said it. -- Adward 15:26, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
He's lying in his initial argument, I believe. When he says the zerg-accusation graffiti is nothing to do with him, that's a lie. I posted some circumstantial evidence on Hmm:talk:
Billy Forks said: |
The evidence that you are responsible for the graffiti slandering Ross is circumstantial, but strong:
|
Cheveyo ignored this, preferring ad hominem attacks. There is now evidence that he's still in the area, still putting up the same graffiti. Yesterday I resprayed our hospital with one of our recruiting tags, and today it's gone again: http://iamscott.net/1264408603864.html. The accusation is even worded the same as in his broadcast from Woodroffe Mall: http://img44.imageshack.us/i/whatisthisbr.jpg/ . Cheveyo is still in the area: http://iamscott.net/1264408944836.html