UDWiki talk:Administration/Arbitration/Cheveyo vs Rosslessness: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 12: Line 12:
:Yap. While I get some popcorn, did Ross ever even use any profanity or a hostile tone? Sure, confirmed zergs/cheats deserve it, but with Cheveyo being less-than-totally-confirmed I like how Ross stayed classy. At least, I can't see or remember anything unclassy. Other people, yeah, but that's not part of this case. Heh. --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' [[Image:Littlemudkipsig.gif]] 08:12, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
:Yap. While I get some popcorn, did Ross ever even use any profanity or a hostile tone? Sure, confirmed zergs/cheats deserve it, but with Cheveyo being less-than-totally-confirmed I like how Ross stayed classy. At least, I can't see or remember anything unclassy. Other people, yeah, but that's not part of this case. Heh. --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' [[Image:Littlemudkipsig.gif]] 08:12, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
::Bob pretty much said it. --{{User:Drawde/Sig}} 15:26, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
::Bob pretty much said it. --{{User:Drawde/Sig}} 15:26, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
He's lying in his initial argument, I believe. When he says the zerg-accusation graffiti is nothing to do with him, that's a lie. I posted some circumstantial evidence on Hmm:talk:
{{divquote|Billy Forks|The evidence that you are responsible for the graffiti slandering Ross is circumstantial, but strong:
* You had a quarrel with him over some other issue in some other suburb.
* The graffiti specifies Ross, not by the name of his SFH alt, but as you've interacted with him before.
* It started appearing at the same moment you arrived - your introductory post on the Knights Templar board saying 'lets attack SFHNAS' was 6th Jan., pretty much the same time as the graffiti started. (plus or minus a day or two, but we've never had zerging accusations sprayed round K'bank in the SFHNAS's 1.5-year history.)
* You have a record of accusing people of zerging whenever you fight against them - Angels of Mercy, penguinpyro.
* The graffiti contains... wait for it... your fingerprint ellipses: http://iamscott.net/1263988553566.html and http://iamscott.net/1263840501883.html.}}
Cheveyo ignored this, preferring ''ad hominem'' attacks.
There is now evidence that he's still in the area, still putting up the same graffiti. Yesterday I resprayed our hospital with one of our recruiting tags, and today it's gone again: http://iamscott.net/1264408603864.html. The accusation is even worded the same as in his broadcast from Woodroffe Mall: http://img44.imageshack.us/i/whatisthisbr.jpg/ . Cheveyo is still in the area: http://iamscott.net/1264408944836.html

Revision as of 09:04, 25 January 2010

Zerg

I'm willing to bet Ross is right... -Poodle of DoomM! Fear is only as deep as the mind will allow it be.T 03:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

From Talk:Arbies

This will be an interesting case. Both sides seem to accuse the other of zerging--which is certainly an issue that will make it very difficult to find an un-biased arbitor for. --Maverick Talk - OBR Praise Knowledge! 404 09:56, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

You don't need to find an unbiased arbiter. Just one that they both agree to. Big difference. ;) Aichon 14:43, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Personally, I think if you want an unbiased arbitrator, you need to pick a volunteer at random, who has no invested interest in the wiki,... by that I mean, someone who's not directly involved, or doesn't seek to benifit from the politics revolving around the case, or wiki.... -Poodle of DoomM! Fear is only as deep as the mind will allow it be.T 01:16, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Chev's initial argument

He's boned. --

07:35, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Yap. While I get some popcorn, did Ross ever even use any profanity or a hostile tone? Sure, confirmed zergs/cheats deserve it, but with Cheveyo being less-than-totally-confirmed I like how Ross stayed classy. At least, I can't see or remember anything unclassy. Other people, yeah, but that's not part of this case. Heh. --Bob Boberton TF / DW Littlemudkipsig.gif 08:12, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Bob pretty much said it. -- Adward  15:26, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

He's lying in his initial argument, I believe. When he says the zerg-accusation graffiti is nothing to do with him, that's a lie. I posted some circumstantial evidence on Hmm:talk:

Billy Forks said:
The evidence that you are responsible for the graffiti slandering Ross is circumstantial, but strong:
  • You had a quarrel with him over some other issue in some other suburb.
  • The graffiti specifies Ross, not by the name of his SFH alt, but as you've interacted with him before.
  • It started appearing at the same moment you arrived - your introductory post on the Knights Templar board saying 'lets attack SFHNAS' was 6th Jan., pretty much the same time as the graffiti started. (plus or minus a day or two, but we've never had zerging accusations sprayed round K'bank in the SFHNAS's 1.5-year history.)
  • You have a record of accusing people of zerging whenever you fight against them - Angels of Mercy, penguinpyro.
  • The graffiti contains... wait for it... your fingerprint ellipses: http://iamscott.net/1263988553566.html and http://iamscott.net/1263840501883.html.

Cheveyo ignored this, preferring ad hominem attacks. There is now evidence that he's still in the area, still putting up the same graffiti. Yesterday I resprayed our hospital with one of our recruiting tags, and today it's gone again: http://iamscott.net/1264408603864.html. The accusation is even worded the same as in his broadcast from Woodroffe Mall: http://img44.imageshack.us/i/whatisthisbr.jpg/ . Cheveyo is still in the area: http://iamscott.net/1264408944836.html