UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Archive/2009 01: Difference between revisions
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
===[[Left 4 Dead]]=== | ===[[Left 4 Dead]]=== | ||
Crit 2 - I love L4D, you love L4D, it doesn't need a wiki page. --{{User:Nubis/sig}} 14:19, 9 January 2009 (UTC) | Crit 2 - I love L4D, you love L4D, it doesn't need a wiki page. --{{User:Nubis/sig}} 14:19, 9 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
==Served Speedy Deletions== | ==Served Speedy Deletions== | ||
Revision as of 17:59, 9 January 2009
|
Speedy Deletions Archive | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This is the archive page for UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions.
Speedy Deletion Queue
Left 4 Dead
Crit 2 - I love L4D, you love L4D, it doesn't need a wiki page. --– Nubis NWO 14:19, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Served Speedy Deletions
Image:PKSig2.PNG
Failed experiment. -- 
.
. <== DDR Approved Editor 17:30, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- done --People's Commissar Hagnat talk mod 17:37, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Death Row Teddy Bears
Death Row Teddy Bears: Crit 3 because I just made it so, have moved all content to userspace and wish to delete and recreate the page. Should be a Crit 7 but the original author is not contactable. Nonetheless, I assure you that I represent the will of the group. Thank you! --Phillip Jablonski 15:11, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - It's only Crit 7 because the user above removed all contact, this should be an A/VB case for blanking another group's pages and attempting to take ownership. --
.
. <== DDR Approved Editor 15:27, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
You don't seem to have even tried to contact the original author, at least not trough the wiki, and your account was only created today. I think it's best if this page was rolled back and kept, even if you can prove that you're a long term member who has inherited the group -- boxy talk • teh rulz 00:20 8 January 2009 (BST)
@Iscariot: I do believe I said as much. Thank you for reiterating. If you check this account's userspace, the content has been duplicated (and expanded) there. Now, please, do not interfere in that which is not your business; unless you've become a sysop recently, in which case congratulations would be in order?
@ Boxy: The group is not coordinated through the wiki, we have forums hosted elsewhere. The original wikipage author has been out of contact for a month or more, the membership has increased, and more wiki-savvy members have been getting active again and wanted to revamp the page. As said, the content has been backed up to userspace, so technically I believe this could be considered a Crit 1, "duplicated elsewhere to no purpose".
As I'm sure you can tell, this is not a newb group – all are alts of experienced players who would prefer their identities to remain shrouded. Thus, the purpose of this deletion request is to remove edit history; if necessary, we can just recreate the same content after it's deleted but with the history gone. If you must confirm group continuity rather than, say, copying the page contents, deleting the page, and pasting them in again, I give you permission to checkuser this account and email or contact (outside the wiki) the other account of the user who created it, they can give you whatever bonefides you require. The utmost discretion is requested, however.
Yes, I realise I could just take this to Deletions and have all the active members vote on it, but the purpose of this account was to have a shared account, not for us all to require alt wiki accounts, and would not be speedy.
I hope this is satisfactory? Phillip Jablonski 14:20, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- You claim that you have contact with the users involved with this group. If this fact is true, then i ask the profiles listed in this page to change their description to add some random text with references to teddy bear and udwiki. If atleast half of the profiles listed comply with this request, i'll grant you ownership of this page and delete it. Provided Wasted Wallaby doesnt show up before and deny you this right, of course. Contact me in my user page when you have arranged this. --People's Commissar Hagnat talk mod 15:50, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Evidence provided was enough for me to grant User:Phillip Jablonski ownership of the page and decide its fate. Page delete as requested. --People's Commissar Hagnat talk mod 16:27, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you hagnat, pleasure doing business with you.
|
Gold in the Basket |
| This user resolved the situation by putting the gold in the basket. |
--Phillip Jablonski 16:32, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
User:Denver Randleman/History
criteria 1, was revampin my username and related pages, made a history page that i ment to be a news page. sorry for the hassle. -- Denver 5MoC 05:25, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Some Templates
Criterion 7: Unused / failed template. --Zarneverfike 10:58, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
- done, done and done. Next time group your speedy deletion requests when the pages in question are like these. (author edit only, no content and no outside links pointing to them) --People's Commissar Hagnat talk mod 12:40, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
The Status Reporters/Map
Crit 7. Should have been created in the template namespace (which I just did.) It's also crit 1 (a dupe.) Linkthewindow Talk 11:58, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Category:Nerd10101
Users are not allowed there own categories, aren't they? I've removed all the pages that had this on there (only one,) and all that is left is a redirect (which is a user page redirect anyway.) So crit 1, but it's scheduled anyway. Linkthewindow Talk 08:53, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- Of course, I can't find it right now, but I remember reading that a group needs 3 pages to earn a category. I was looking for it to see if it mentioned individual users. My wiki fu is weak right now. :/--– Nubis NWO 10:37, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- I recall reading that as well. Linkthewindow Talk 10:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- In future, I think it might be best to not remove the category tags from pages until the Category is deleted. That way we can get a good idea about what actually is in that category since the history won't show that.--– Nubis NWO 21:53, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- This was the only page in the category. Linkthewindow Talk 00:20, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Image:SASNinja.jpg
Dupe. --Janus talk 14:35, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Image:Amberwaves.jpeg
Crit 2 I guess. All in all, just another rather pathetic attempt by the TZH to trump someone they don't like.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 20:45, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- Not deleted. Image is in use. --– Nubis NWO 21:48, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- Are you serious? In use? One page. I could understand if it was being used on more than one page, or even linked to from more than the A/SD pages, but it's not. Its a useless, badly made MS paint image, who's purpose is to incite reaction and make another user look bad. Waste of bandwidth.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 21:59, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- What about putting it on A/D? --Janus talk 22:11, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- I was going to, but I hoped another sysops would see it and have a better judgment. I'm leaving now, so if you want to take care of it, you can.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 23:13, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- If no-one does anything with this, I'll be able to get in contact with Amber (via IRC.) Linkthewindow Talk 23:28, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- For teh records, it's only in use on a talk page, and the message is half a year old :|. Linkthewindow Talk 23:59, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- I was going to, but I hoped another sysops would see it and have a better judgment. I'm leaving now, so if you want to take care of it, you can.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 23:13, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- What about putting it on A/D? --Janus talk 22:11, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- Are you serious? In use? One page. I could understand if it was being used on more than one page, or even linked to from more than the A/SD pages, but it's not. Its a useless, badly made MS paint image, who's purpose is to incite reaction and make another user look bad. Waste of bandwidth.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 21:59, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Followers of the Clawt
Crit one, not edited since July, not on stat page. Linkthewindow Talk 07:41, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Sword of the Uninfected
As above. Crit 1. Linkthewindow Talk 07:53, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Makawa'o
Crit 7 & 9. My mistake, I did not realize there were user pages. All content moved to the user page already.Makawa'o 21:34, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Devive
Sitting there since March. Crit 1, never even heard of this before (the tactic, that is.) Linkthewindow Talk 05:36, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- This is a term that is actually used, however deVive redirects to The soft parade/DeVive, rather than here. Although the page contains a bit of group specific information, it may be better to redirect this on there as well -- boxy talk • teh rulz 06:28 6 January 2009 (BST)
- Redirected. Any problems? Linkthewindow Talk 06:36, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:Cathedral
Crit 1. Blank page. Linkthewindow Talk 05:36, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Necrotech Special Forces
Crit 3. Linkthewindow Talk 05:36, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Fail Medical Group
Sitting there since July (possibly pre-purge, as the only edit was by Karek.) Crit 1. Linkthewindow Talk 05:39, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
User talk:Mysticlegacy
Non-exsistant user talk page. Someone's been editing under that name over at the Radio page, so I just typed in User:Mysticlegacy... gah. Sorry :(. Linkthewindow Talk 06:14, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Crit 7's
Cleaning house.
User:SirArgo/LordArgo
User:SirArgo/Argo v82
User:SirArgo/PropagandaJoe
--SirArgo Talk 07:31, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Church of cliff burton role call
Crit 3. Unused redirect (doesn't link anywhere, anyway.) Linkthewindow Talk 14:00, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Bread_and_Pasta
Created for a group on the stat page, had no content. Said group is no longer on the stat page, and this page is now a crit 1. Linkthewindow Talk 12:19, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- Now this one is old and should go. I mean everyone knows you need olive oil for your bread, FAIL! --WanYao 14:50, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- Done.--Karekmaps?! 18:46, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
The E.Vil Cliq
Crit one, not edited since 30 December, sole editor has left the wiki. Linkthewindow Talk 11:47, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - It's less than a week old! And you don't know that the editor has "left the wiki". It's a holiday. --WanYao 14:49, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Disposable Heroes
Ditto, except 27 December. Linkthewindow Talk 11:47, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - A week old. Back off. Give it a month or so. --WanYao 14:48, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Perzeus
Ditto again, except 1 January. Linkthewindow Talk 11:47, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - SHEEEEEEEEEEESH, quit putting brand new pages up for deletion! --WanYao 14:46, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Image:ODDBALL SAYS.jpg
Unused, resulting from a previous deletion. Linkthewindow Talk 11:47, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
The church of cliff burton/role call
Crit 7, author requested -- boxy talk • teh rulz 11:42 3 January 2009 (BST)
- Karek got it. Linkthewindow Talk 11:47, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Kelly's Heroes
Crit 1. Only an image and a link. Not edited for a month (except for Janus categorizing.) Linkthewindow Talk 06:13, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- Karek got it. Linkthewindow Talk 11:47, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Ryuuki Shikyo
Crit 1, not edited since September. Linkthewindow Talk 14:05, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Last defence, Image:NYMS.gif NYMS.gif, Template:NYM
I don't use the template or the image, and didn't like the end result of the page. Crit 7. --ShiraXTalk00:22, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- Deleted the template and image, however Last defence seems to have been edited (perhaps created) by someone else, and so it's not clear if it falls under crit 7. It should go to the deletions page if you really want it gone (or at least moved to Last defense) -- boxy talk • teh rulz 04:02 3 January 2009 (BST)
User:Super Cindy, User:Lustig
Crit 11. I think they were created by User:Andrew Lennox. --Janus talk 16:03, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Journal:Lustig, Journal:Super_Cindy
Created by the same user and then abandoned with no content. --Janus talk 16:03, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Barhah-Raz Barricade Plan
Here. Crit 1 (or move to a subpage) imo. --Janus talk 15:14, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Dutch Mafia
Nothing but a table. Crit 1. Linkthewindow Talk 12:53, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Archive/2009 1
Dupe. Guess what page of? Linkthewindow Talk 03:13, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Nigga Hardcore Squad moved to A/D. Linkthewindow Talk 03:06, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Malton monsters
As below. Last edit by Vantar (category) on April 2008. --Janus talk 02:34, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Molebank interhamwe
'Group' page not edited since April 2007, only a groupbox. It says 12 members but it's not on the stats page. Crit 1 to me. --Janus talk 02:10, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
DEM (desambiguation)
(I created a Disambig page for DEM, but not sure of its usefulness..) --Janus talk 17:14, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
