UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Archive/2009 06

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Speedy Deletions Archive

2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4
2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Years 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

This is the archive page for UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions.

Speedy Deletion Queue

There are currently no pages in the queue.

Served Speedy Deletions

Talk:Red vs Dead and Talk:The Chosen

Crit 5. Had {{delete}} on them for a while, but haven't seem to have been put through here or A/D, according to the archive. Linkthewindow  Talk  06:14, 29 June 2009 (BST)

Done -- boxy talkteh rulz 21:35 29 June 2009 (BST)

crit 1/7's

All wiped by their original authors. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 17:31, 27 June 2009 (BST)

Done. Linkthewindow  Talk  09:06, 28 June 2009 (BST)

Merged Locations

Looks like these were unmerged a while back but never deleted. Both orphaned.

-- User:The Rooster RoosterDragon User talk:The Rooster 15:21, 27 June 2009 (BST)


Umbrella Biohazard Containment Service/Civilian Program

Crit 7 plz kthzbye. --Haliman - Talk 05:28, 27 June 2009 (BST)

Done. Linkthewindow  Talk  06:28, 27 June 2009 (BST)

crit 3's

I've had these on my sandpit for a while so I might as well put them here. All are practically or totally orphaned, none have values as search tags.


Done. Linkthewindow  Talk  06:28, 27 June 2009 (BST)

Necrotech Mobile/recruit

Crit 7. Old group. Thanks, -- THELORDGUNSLINGER 04:02, 26 June 2009 (BST)

Normally I'd keep this because of wiki history and such, but the main group page is gone too, so done. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 04:47, 26 June 2009 (BST)

Talk:MFU Command

Criterion 3, this redirect is not used. Thanks, G F J 09:50, 25 June 2009 (BST)

boom --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 13:03, 25 June 2009 (BST)


Crit 8. Turns out it was never needed.--SirArgo Talk 19:09, 24 June 2009 (BST)

Done. --Cyberbob 19:30, 24 June 2009 (BST)

Criterion 7

Done. --Cyberbob 17:54, 24 June 2009 (BST)

Scarletwood Junkyards

Scarletwood Junkyards - crit 1, all information is duplicated on the individual junkyard pages, and there are no incoming links -- boxy talkteh rulz 17:33 24 June 2009 (BST)

Done. --Cyberbob 17:39, 24 June 2009 (BST)

Crit 1 Images

They don't show up as images through the wiki but are visible when you click on the source... Hence, it can't be seen through Suburb/History (any wiki software). Might think of putting these 0x0 images up for scheduled voting. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 11:27, 23 June 2009 (BST)

Done. --Cyberbob 15:39, 23 June 2009 (BST)

Big Jim D

Crit.... User in mainspace.DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 11:21, 23 June 2009 (BST)

Done (it's Criterion 9). --Cyberbob 15:39, 23 June 2009 (BST)

My Zombie Can't Bite!

Answered the question on his talk page. Linkthewindow  Talk  07:39, 23 June 2009 (BST)


Crit 7 trillion

Image:ShartakBlip.png - Went text. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 03:29, 23 June 2009 (BST)

Done. --Cyberbob 07:36, 23 June 2009 (BST)


Criterion 10, this template serves no purpose. It has been removed from the List of Revivification Points due to obviously being out of date; the last time stamp is from 2007, the RPs were marked unknown more than one year ago, in 2008. G F J 18:17, 22 June 2009 (BST)

Done. Linkthewindow  Talk  22:20, 22 June 2009 (BST)

Criterion 9

--Cyberbob 04:34, 22 June 2009 (BST)

Various DangerReports

Badly named, crit 1's.

Orphan, not useful, crit 1.

Orphan, separate reports exist for west and east countryside, crit 1.

Orphan, crit 1.

Unsuitable 'area' reports, now orphaned, crit 1's.

Unused redirect from a bad naming of the report above, crit 3.

-- User:The Rooster RoosterDragon User talk:The Rooster 14:06, 21 June 2009 (BST)

I've done all of them, I moved User:DangerReport/Camp Rolls into the user's name space, as its only use is as a userpage template. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 05:45, 22 June 2009 (BST)

Crit 1's

Linkthewindow  Talk  11:46, 21 June 2009 (BST)

I've done all except the last, for now. Someone needs to tell the idiot that made Anti Zombie Medal Site to merge his two frigging groups. They have 26 squads, one for every letter of the alphabet, they have 6 ranks, and he is the only member in both of them (1, 2, 3). Plus he makes pages in 'both' group namespaces, or tries to. It's ridiculous. Also, the last one is a small page in group namespace, in a series of similar character pages that link from the groups page. I would ask them to merge them before deleting one of the 10 that are there. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 12:06, 21 June 2009 (BST)

fuck the what? amnesia was awesome! i demand it be reinstated!--xoxo 12:22, 21 June 2009 (BST)

It's been coming for a while and you know it! DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 05:45, 22 June 2009 (BST)


Crit 7 (yeah, I know about the sysop-only-contributor thing, but I'm not sure if that covers images.) Linkthewindow  Talk  09:56, 20 June 2009 (BST)

bl. Done. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 12:39, 20 June 2009 (BST)

Criterion 7

DRLFF/Orders/Rippon // Messed up playing around with substr templates, and now the page exists but is pointless. Please delete // Belgianrofliron 18:04, 19 June 2009 (BST)

Done. Linkthewindow  Talk  09:57, 20 June 2009 (BST)

Criterion 11

--Cyberbob 13:34, 19 June 2009 (BST)

Can't wait till these are scheduled. done. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 13:49, 19 June 2009 (BST)

User:DangerReport/St Columbanus's Church

Badly named report, not used. -- User:The Rooster RoosterDragon User talk:The Rooster 19:04, 18 June 2009 (BST)

Done. Linkthewindow  Talk  21:20, 18 June 2009 (BST)

More of Gnome's games

Damn you, Gnome. The following Crit 1 pages appear to have been moved over to the user's space.


Done -- boxy talkteh rulz 15:36 17 June 2009 (BST)

The User:Axe27

I'm not sure if this is actually a scheduled deletion, while I'm feeling bold, I'd rather just put it here for all to have a chuckle. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 12:37, 17 June 2009 (BST)

I'll add the crit 11/3 User:Gothicchristian. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 12:38, 17 June 2009 (BST)

Done and done -- boxy talkteh rulz 15:36 17 June 2009 (BST)

A Beginners Guide to Urban Dead

I'm asking to have this deleted due to criteria 11. I am the origninal author. The page has was protected at one point, but after having been taking off protection, was edited to the point where it wasn't equal to that of the original. At that, it's only slightly larger than a stub, and does nothing more than contain a few links to pages that could otherwise be found in elsewhere. The article is worthless. -Poodle of doom 04:07, 17 June 2009 (BST)

Can anyone verify this this is the user that made the page? Else it doesn't fit into any other category (Crit 11 is incorrect) except maybe crit 1, once someone fixes all the links. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:12, 17 June 2009 (BST)
Even if you are the original author, this isn't in your User space (no crit 11), and seeing it has been edited by others (no crit 7), it doesn't fit into any speedydelete criteria. It is still linked from many pages, and is a useful 'hub' sort of page. It is, however, unfortunate if the original content has been lost -- boxy talkteh rulz 15:25 17 June 2009 (BST)
Further discussion moved to the talk page -- boxy talkteh rulz 08:41 18 June 2009 (BST)


Blanked by the author. Linkthewindow  Talk  13:30, 16 June 2009 (BST)

Done. -- Cheese 14:03, 16 June 2009 (BST)

Jobava Suburb

As above. Linkthewindow  Talk  13:32, 16 June 2009 (BST)

Done. -- Cheese 14:03, 16 June 2009 (BST)

User:Willy Sni

Because DDR is lazy (crit 11.) Linkthewindow  Talk  13:33, 16 June 2009 (BST)

Done. -- Cheese 14:03, 16 June 2009 (BST)


Dupe. Linkthewindow  Talk  13:55, 16 June 2009 (BST)

Done. -- Cheese 14:03, 16 June 2009 (BST)

Fitkin Auto Repair (Peddlesden Village)

Fitkin Auto Repair (Peddlesden Village) - crit 1, duped at Fitkin Auto Repair -- boxy talkteh rulz 03:45 15 June 2009 (BST)



Crits 7 & 8. --Midianian¦T¦DS¦SP¦ 15:13, 14 June 2009 (BST)


Talk:Malton Forensics Unit/Command

Unused redirect, criterion 3. G F J 11:39, 14 June 2009 (BST)

Done. Linkthewindow  Talk  13:54, 14 June 2009 (BST)

crit 11

User:Louis Creed. c11, a rare one... missed from a move request, I imagine. One questions why these too aren't scheduled. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 12:07, 13 June 2009 (BST)

Done, and I've got no idea. Stop complaining, why not suggest them :P Linkthewindow  Talk  15:06, 13 June 2009 (BST)
I shall once I've figured out the ins-and-outs of them. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:34, 13 June 2009 (BST)
Perhaps not as rare as you would think... User:Louis creed ;P Someone want to nuke that one too? -- boxy talkteh rulz 11:12 14 June 2009 (BST)
Yeah done. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 11:24, 14 June 2009 (BST)

Medibaw Plaza

Crit 1/2. Linkthewindow  Talk  09:25, 13 June 2009 (BST)


Crit 7/8

I no longer need these pages. Character's are scrapped.--SirArgo Talk 07:07, 13 June 2009 (BST)


Crit 8

Don't need these any more:

Cheers! ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾ 05:29, 12 June 2009 (BST)

All done. Linkthewindow  Talk  04:17, 13 June 2009 (BST)


Crit 1 duplicated at Template:Bibliophile -- boxy talkteh rulz 01:41 11 June 2009 (BST)


Long-titled image

Title was far too long, so I replaced it with Image:Issac grey userpage.jpg on Isaac Grey's page. So the image above is now duped and unused. Linkthewindow  Talk  20:45, 10 June 2009 (BST)

Done -- boxy talkteh rulz 01:41 11 June 2009 (BST)

Journal: Sergei Stahlfeder

Blanked by the author. Linkthewindow  Talk  21:14, 10 June 2009 (BST)

Done -- boxy talkteh rulz 01:41 11 June 2009 (BST)

c5 from a c3

Talk:People Killing Every Rotter, deleted 2 years ago as an unused redirect, but the talk page from the original article still remained on the redirect page. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:04, 9 June 2009 (BST)

While I'm here, is there any specific reason why missed talk pages aren't scheduled? DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:09, 9 June 2009 (BST)
Done. I've got no idea, by the way. Linkthewindow  Talk  20:47, 10 June 2009 (BST)


Created and tagged by original author 10 minutes later. No other edits. Crit 7. -- User:The Rooster RoosterDragon User talk:The Rooster 15:33, 10 June 2009 (BST)


Image:SIM core image.png

made this for the wrong place, kill plox.--xoxo 09:32, 10 June 2009 (BST)


User:DangerReport:Haag Plaza Police Department

The second colon should have been a forward-slash. Sorry I didn't spot the 'speedy' option earlier. Got it now. Lariat2301 13:46, 9 June 2009 (BST)

It's alright, we all gotta learn somehow. Done. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 14:11, 9 June 2009 (BST)


These are both dupes of Browning Cureators, I considered changing them to redirects, but they are both orphans and no one in their right mind would type them instead of the actual article. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 13:41, 8 June 2009 (BST)

Done. Linkthewindow  Talk  07:55, 9 June 2009 (BST)

Template:news archive

The template utilizes a [[../]] link, which is not supported on this wiki. Therefore the template is broken and useless. --GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 06:09, 9 June 2009 (BST)

Use something different... What are you trying to achieve? DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 06:14, 9 June 2009 (BST)
I see now... Well, since its a crit 7, done. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 06:28, 9 June 2009 (BST)
Oh I was trying to create a relative link, where UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Archive would link to the parent page of the current subpage. So for example, in a news archive page it would link back to the main article. I found a clunky workaround. Thanks for the delete! --GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 17:20, 10 June 2009 (BST)

Talk:Dr Steel's Toy Soldiers

Crit 1. The parent page is now a redirect, and the talk has been moved accordingly. -- User:The Rooster RoosterDragon User talk:The Rooster 00:50, 9 June 2009 (BST)

Would have redirected, but it was orphaned, so deleted. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 06:19, 9 June 2009 (BST)

Unused Fort Status Templates

Crit 1's. All made redundant as they are no longer called from their master templates Template:Fort Creedy Status and Template:Fort Creedy Status. -- User:The Rooster RoosterDragon User talk:The Rooster 00:50, 9 June 2009 (BST)

Take it you mean Template:Fort Perryn Status. Either ways, master templates use a totally new coding system so done. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 06:23, 9 June 2009 (BST)


Left behind from an old page move, as it was a userpage in the main namespace. The content on it seems to have made it to User:Gargulec so it should be safe to delete. -- User:The Rooster RoosterDragon User talk:The Rooster 18:20, 8 June 2009 (BST)



Spur of the moment idea now abandoned. Pointless to keep. Please delete.--Psychotic Pantomime 05:50, 9 June 2009 (BST)

Done. We've wanted to get rid of this page for a while now >=] DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 05:51, 9 June 2009 (BST)
Thanks, I noticed. lol I didn't even have time to get the template in and there was an edit conflict, it had been deleted already. :P --Psychotic Pantomime 06:08, 9 June 2009 (BST)
We're good like that. Good luck in wherever you endeavour to go next. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 06:24, 9 June 2009 (BST)

St. Telesphorous's Hospital

-- User:The Rooster RoosterDragon User talk:The Rooster 18:01, 8 June 2009 (BST)



Crit 1, created in error. -- User:The Rooster RoosterDragon User talk:The Rooster 16:25, 7 June 2009 (BST)

Boom --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 16:54, 7 June 2009 (BST)

Zephyrinus Family and Category:Zephyrinus

Both blanked by the author. Note that on the second one, OrangeGaf is adding a category, not expanding to the page. Linkthewindow  Talk  07:36, 7 June 2009 (BST)


Median Battle Rating

User redirect sitting in the SD candidate bin, but never submitted. -- User:The Rooster RoosterDragon User talk:The Rooster 00:34, 7 June 2009 (BST)

Scheduled Deletion. Linkthewindow  Talk  02:12, 7 June 2009 (BST)

Random Stuff

-- User:The Rooster RoosterDragon User talk:The Rooster 21:09, 5 June 2009 (BST)

Done all but Take Back - it doesn't fall under a traditional criterion, so I'm just going to leave it here for a few days to see if anyone objects to it's deletion. However, it is old and quite useless, so I can't see any objections. Linkthewindow  Talk  04:28, 6 June 2009 (BST)
It was under that mythical criterion of mine "It looks like junk". But best have it rated for it's level of junkiness anyway. -- User:The Rooster RoosterDragon User talk:The Rooster 00:34, 7 June 2009 (BST)

Criteria 1 & 2

--Cyberbob 07:01, 6 June 2009 (BST)

Done. Linkthewindow  Talk  07:02, 6 June 2009 (BST)
And so goes to waste the article I was writing for it. I thought people would have fun playing the guessing game. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 07:08, 6 June 2009 (BST)


Talk:Suggestions/17th-Jan-2007 - an old talk:suggestions page overflow. I've moved most of the content to User talk:Boxy/Suggestions/See Barricades, all that's left is the last section -- boxy talkteh rulz 02:35 5 June 2009 (BST)

Oh, actually it's not an overflow, but the talk page associated with Suggestions/17th-Jan-2007 from the old system... still, all suggestions on that page were removed (for one reason or another), so it's probably a crit 1 or something -- boxy talkteh rulz 02:40 5 June 2009 (BST)
Hmm. I'm not so familiar with the old suggestions system... Are you asking we delete the talk page for a suggestion article under Crit 1, because you copied the contents (which was 95% your content) into your user namespace? Because at the moment I'm not comfortable deleting it, particularly because the talk page's contents are directly moved from the article itself and therefore cited on there. Meaning, if we deleted it, the main article would have no link to the contents it once had. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 16:08, 5 June 2009 (BST)
Keep - It's valid suggestions discussion that should be kept somewhere within the suggestions system. Move it to a new style page and do whatever magical tagging it associated with suggestions removed for revision if you like, but don't shaft the talk page. -- User:The Rooster RoosterDragon User talk:The Rooster 20:55, 5 June 2009 (BST)
OK, withdrawn -- boxy talkteh rulz 00:30 6 June 2009 (BST)

Criterion 7

Fun concept but I quickly lost interest. --Cyberbob 15:56, 5 June 2009 (BST)

Has so much potential... I wish you'd or someone else would pick it up sometime in the future. Done. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 16:00, 5 June 2009 (BST)


See below - it doesn't show up on Firefox. Linkthewindow  Talk  12:45, 4 June 2009 (BST)


Broken images

Neither of these show up on my browser. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 06:09, 4 June 2009 (BST)

Done. Linkthewindow  Talk  12:45, 4 June 2009 (BST)

Miscellaneous Redirects

The following are all unused.

-- User:The Rooster RoosterDragon User talk:The Rooster 18:03, 1 June 2009 (BST)

I left a couple of the location ones which may be used as a search tag at some point... I am going to ark all such unused redirects in a future project, so they won't be considered for deletion in the future. hopefully. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 16:33, 2 June 2009 (BST)
I got rid of the co-ordinate redirect. People are unlikely to search for that, given that the coordinates on maps and stuff are in the 26,10 format, with a comma. The weird capitalisation ones are pretty unlikely too, but meh -- boxy talkteh rulz 02:23 5 June 2009 (BST)

Stanbury Village Hospitals


--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 14:28, 1 June 2009 (BST)

From Special:Unused Templates

Went through some of the unused templates and picked out the ones I'm 99% sure are safe to delete.

Additionally, this page:

  • XXXX - Was a placeholder link way back when so incomplete location blocks could be tracked, thus no longer needed. Content is duped.

Man this wiki sure does accumulate junk. -- User:The Rooster RoosterDragon User talk:The Rooster 17:50, 24 May 2009 (BST)

For the templates that have like under 5 links, if possible I would suggest copying the code onto the pages directly. That way they don't lose the design, but it doesn't waste resources/space by having a template. After that the template should be deleted if it isn't needed. That's what I did when I organized the templates last time. --– Nubis NWO 01:32, 25 May 2009 (BST)
These are all unused templates. The links are just links, not inclusions (usually just references from somebody's talk page). I merely mention them offhand. -- User:The Rooster RoosterDragon User talk:The Rooster 13:06, 25 May 2009 (BST)

Did we not undelete the crit 12 template? Oh yes, we did. Therefore you can have a keep on this entry until someone arks the various ones that are important. Seriously, disk space = cheep. -- To know the face of God is to know madness....Praise knowledge! Mischief! Mayhem! The Rogues Gallery!. <== DDR Approved Editor 02:19, 25 May 2009 (BST)

I struck the Crit 12 Template, and when I have the time I'll continue to check the other templates at your request. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 01:36, 26 May 2009 (BST)

Just had a quick look through them now. A fair bit of it seems to be the usual useless junk that the wiki accumulates. A few of note (some which should be saved, IMO.)

  • Template:ComradeOfTalunex is kind of like the ZPOV templates on deletions a while ago - the template isn't used, the image is specifically in place of the template it seems
  • Template:Love goolina should go, or at least be replaced with a redirect (which would quickly be deleted anyway.)
  • Not too sure about Template:PD Status Map - it isn't actively being edited, but it could be quite useful if someone wants to put a bit of effort into it. So a keep on it for now.
  • Similar to the Talunex one above, Template:PrickSuburb isn't used, the image appears to be used in it's place.
  • Again, I'm voting keep on Template:DailyTasks for now - it could be potentially useful, although I won't be surprised if it's a dupe
  • Template:Infirmary is duped in function by Template:CreedyNW and Template:PerrynW
  • Template:Influencemap should potentially be kept - it may be useful as a subst: template (see: MOB,) hence why it isn't showing up as being included in some pages
Ditto for Template:InfluenceMapColors/Allied

That's it - most of the rest is useless groupbox templates and old bits of code.

For the record, the old Crit 12 template was undeleted for historical interest - I'll include on a sandbox page now so this mistake doesn't happen again. Linkthewindow  Talk  11:38, 26 May 2009 (BST)

Template:DailyTasks is outdated and is only a record of how to cycle the old suggestions system, it currently serves no utility beyond 'historical interest' which it was kept for in a previous vote. It's here because it wasn't used or linked to otherwise, thus I doubted anybody actually cared. Same for the crit12 template. If people don't mind orphaned & unused stuff floating about in the netherworld, so be it. Takes up the same disk space deleted or not after all.
The PD Status Map is an unfinished relic, it takes after the old method used for the NT Status Map & co. Hell I could knock up a new style one at some point. But I assure you there's nothing there worth keeping right now. That reminds me, the entire User:PoliceScanner namespace can be shafted at some point too.
I struck the IM. -- User:The Rooster RoosterDragon User talk:The Rooster 13:40, 26 May 2009 (BST)
Thanks, and point taken on both of those. A PD Status Map is a bit pointless anyway. Linkthewindow  Talk  13:43, 26 May 2009 (BST)
Ping... What's going on with these? Have all the templates been confirmed as deletable? DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 08:23, 1 June 2009 (BST)
They were all unused, I distilled the list, various people have looked over them, whoever deletes them will double check the links anyway, and if anything somehow slips through that, we have the magic of Undeletions. -- User:The Rooster RoosterDragon User talk:The Rooster 11:34, 1 June 2009 (BST)
Alright. The only thing stopping me is that last distilled list by Link. Did you actually strike the ones you want to keep? I just need to make sure. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 12:27, 1 June 2009 (BST)
In the original list, any keeps (3) have been struck. -- User:The Rooster RoosterDragon User talk:The Rooster 12:31, 1 June 2009 (BST)
Confirming. Linkthewindow  Talk  12:31, 1 June 2009 (BST)
Yes... But in links list under it. The keeps are the unstruck ones? DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 12:34, 1 June 2009 (BST)
Yes DDR. The struck ones on my list are keeps. Linkthewindow  Talk  12:35, 1 June 2009 (BST)
K. Why aren't you deleting these, Mr Condescending? >=[ DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 12:37, 1 June 2009 (BST)
Whoops. The struck ones are deletes. Sorry, it's late and I'm tired. Linkthewindow  Talk  12:40, 1 June 2009 (BST)
Its cool. Thats why I was pushing on with this stupid conversation... It was confusing me. Alrighty, I might have at these now. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 12:43, 1 June 2009 (BST)

Done - I've nuked all of them except for Cyberbob's Sonny template, which I noticed was linked as a historical item on his user page. I'd rather have him say it's alright before we delete it. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 13:09, 1 June 2009 (BST)

Why not Template:Love goolina? No-one's expressed any objection to it going, and it's a simple redirect. I'll do it by morning if none complains. Linkthewindow  Talk  13:13, 1 June 2009 (BST)
I think DDR confused your non-struck comments as keeps. -- User:The Rooster RoosterDragon User talk:The Rooster 13:14, 1 June 2009 (BST)
Sometimes I just don't get you two... Weren't the struck ones on link's pile the deletes from HIS keep pile? I am just too confused now... Link, you can finish the rest ;_; DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 14:15, 1 June 2009 (BST)

Somewhere else

Crit one, only four words. Linkthewindow  Talk  08:00, 1 June 2009 (BST)

Done. It was young, but given that the only links were from Template:NWnews and A sarcastic speech by Grim in 2007, both serving as an example link, this page was technically just a dupe (in practice) of Example page. Hence, no need for it. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 08:19, 1 June 2009 (BST)

Ballsy McRockschwitz

Crit 9--Orange Talk 02:09, 1 June 2009 (BST)

Keep - I'm putting a move request for this before we delete it. He's put some work into this page. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 02:19, 1 June 2009 (BST)
NAO! BURN THEM! BURN THEM!--Orange Talk 02:29, 1 June 2009 (BST)

Scheduled deletion (unused redirect resulting from move, user page redirect.) Linkthewindow  Talk  07:48, 1 June 2009 (BST)