Category talk:Historical Groups: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
(→‎[[The Church Of The Beyonder]]: lolz we all voted "against" instead of "no". Just changing for clarity.)
Line 19: Line 19:
<small>Nomination added by [[User:Paedobear]] at 05:09, 15 November 2009</small>
<small>Nomination added by [[User:Paedobear]] at 05:09, 15 November 2009</small>


#'''Against''' - Allied with [[TZH]], a quick shout to the [[PKA]] should kill this. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 11:55, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
#'''No''' - Allied with [[TZH]], a quick shout to the [[PKA]] should kill this. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 11:55, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
#'''Against''' - Who? {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 11:59, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
#'''No''' - Who? {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 11:59, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
#'''Against''' - Bad. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 12:01, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
#'''No''' - Bad. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 12:01, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
#'''Against''' Another example of why historical voting is fail. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 12:16, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
#'''No''' Another example of why historical voting is fail. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 12:16, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
#:Dunno... I'd consider it a better example if this trashball actually ''passed''. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 12:50, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
#:Dunno... I'd consider it a better example if this trashball actually ''passed''. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 12:50, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
#'''Against''' - Never heard of them. --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 12:55, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
#'''No''' - Never heard of them. --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 12:55, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
#'''Against''' - I've never heard of you and you don't appear to have contributed significantly to the game, even in your own suburb of Dulston, but your wiki page is amusing. Have fun with MW2!--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 13:01, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
#'''No''' - I've never heard of you and you don't appear to have contributed significantly to the game, even in your own suburb of Dulston, but your wiki page is amusing. Have fun with MW2!--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 13:01, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
#'''Against''' - You've got to be fucking kidding me... --[[User:The Hierophant|Papa Moloch]] 13:10, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
#'''No''' - You've got to be fucking kidding me... --[[User:The Hierophant|Papa Moloch]] 13:10, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
#'''Against''' - Never heard of you folks. --{{User:Janus Abernathy/Sig}} 13:33, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
#'''No''' - Never heard of you folks. --{{User:Janus Abernathy/Sig}} 13:33, 15 November 2009 (UTC)


==Recent Nominations==
==Recent Nominations==

Revision as of 13:40, 15 November 2009

Obtaining Historical Status

A policy is in place which outlines the method to attain historical status.

  1. Groups must no longer actively contribute to the game.
  2. A nomination should be made on Category talk:Historical Groups.
  3. Within two weeks of a nomination, the group must be approved by 2/3 of the voters, with a minimum of 15 voters for a nomination to pass. The only allowable votes are Yes and No.
  4. Groups that pass will be added to the category as described below.
  5. Groups must allow a week to pass between nominations.


Nominations for Historical Status

When nominating a group, please add a note to Template:Wiki News and add {{HistoricalGroupVoting}} to the top of the group's page.

New Nominations

The Church Of The Beyonder

Nomination added by User:Paedobear at 05:09, 15 November 2009

  1. No - Allied with TZH, a quick shout to the PKA should kill this. -- To know the face of God is to know madness....Praise knowledge! Mischief! Mayhem! The Rogues Gallery!. <== DDR Approved Editor 11:55, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
  2. No - Who? The sun shone, having no alternative, on the nothing new 11:59, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
  3. No - Bad. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 12:01, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
  4. No Another example of why historical voting is fail. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 12:16, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
    Dunno... I'd consider it a better example if this trashball actually passed. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 12:50, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
  5. No - Never heard of them. --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 12:55, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
  6. No - I've never heard of you and you don't appear to have contributed significantly to the game, even in your own suburb of Dulston, but your wiki page is amusing. Have fun with MW2!--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 13:01, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
  7. No - You've got to be fucking kidding me... --Papa Moloch 13:10, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
  8. No - Never heard of you folks. --Janus talk 13:33, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Recent Nominations

Previous Discussions

There are 3 archives for this page.

General Discussion

Books.jpg Things Best Forgotten
This Category talk page has an archive.

Voting Succeeded

Books.jpg Things Best Forgotten
This Category talk page has an archive.

Voting Failed

Books.jpg Things Best Forgotten
This Category talk page has an archive.

Historical Groups Use Discussion

Retrieved from "http://wiki.urbandead.com//index.php?title=Category_talk:Historical_Groups&oldid=1599811"