Revision as of 14:42, 15 November 2009

Obtaining Historical Status

A policy is in place which outlines the method to attain historical status.

Groups must no longer actively contribute to the game.
A nomination should be made on Category talk:Historical Groups.
Within two weeks of a nomination, the group must be approved by 2/3 of the voters, with a minimum of 15 voters for a nomination to pass. The only allowable votes are Yes and No.
Groups that pass will be added to the category as described below.
Groups must allow a week to pass between nominations.

When nominating a group, please add a note to Template:Wiki News and add {{HistoricalGroupVoting}} to the top of the group's page.

Nomination added by User:Paedobear at 05:09, 15 November 2009

No - Allied with TZH, a quick shout to the PKA should kill this. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 11:55, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
No - Who? 11:59, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
No - Bad. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 12:01, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
No Another example of why historical voting is fail. --Ross less ne s s^{Want a Location Image?} 12:16, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Dunno... I'd consider it a better example if this trashball actually passed. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 12:50, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Because its a populartiy contest, and this example shows that people don't understand what "historical" even means. Note the complete lack of justification for the nomination. --Ross less ne s s^{Want a Location Image?} 14:41, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
No - Never heard of them. --Yonnua Koponen^{Talk ! Contribs} 12:55, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
No - I've never heard of you and you don't appear to have contributed significantly to the game, even in your own suburb of Dulston, but your wiki page is amusing. Have fun with MW2!--_GANG Giles Sednik_CAPD 13:01, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
No - You've got to be fucking kidding me... --Papa Moloch 13:10, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
No - Never heard of you folks. --Janus ^talk 13:33, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
No - Haven't heard of you and i'm currently in Dulston. --Rahrah^{Come join the #party!}14:32, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

There are 3 archives for this page.

	Things Best Forgotten
	This Category talk page has an archive.

	Things Best Forgotten
	This Category talk page has an archive.

	Things Best Forgotten
	This Category talk page has an archive.

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 #'''No''' - Bad. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 12:01, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 #'''No''' Another example of why historical voting is fail. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 12:16, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
-#:Dunno... I'd consider it a better example if this trashball actually ''passed''.
+#:Dunno... I'd consider it a better example if this trashball actually ''passed''. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 12:50, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
---{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 12:50, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 #::Because its a populartiy contest, and this example shows that people don't understand what "historical" even means. Note the complete lack of justification for the nomination. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 14:41, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 #'''No''' - Never heard of them. --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 12:55, 15 November 2009 (UTC)