UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Archive/2010 04: Difference between revisions
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
''There are currently no pages in the queue.'' | ''There are currently no pages in the queue.'' | ||
Place beneath this note, outside of the comment tags. --> | Place beneath this note, outside of the comment tags. --> | ||
===[[Malton PD Strike Division]]=== | |||
Scheduled. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 10:33, 17 April 2010 (BST) | |||
===Crit 10 AND Crit 1's=== | ===Crit 10 AND Crit 1's=== | ||
Revision as of 09:33, 17 April 2010
This is the archive page for UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions.
Speedy Deletion Queue
Malton PD Strike Division
Scheduled. -- 
.
. <== DDR Approved Editor 10:33, 17 April 2010 (BST)
Crit 10 AND Crit 1's
These are unused, as well as being crit 1's of the Template:Visited XXXX Mall templates which can be seen on userpages such as these.
- Template:Bale Mall
- Template:Ackland Mall
- Template:Blesley Mall
- Template:Calvert Mall
- Template:Dowdney Mall
- Template:Hildebrand Mall
- Template:Joachim Mall
- Template:Lumber Mall
- Template:Marven Mall
- Template:Marven Mall
- Template:Mitchem Mall
- Template:Nichols Mall
- Template:Pole Mall
- Template:Tompson Mall
- Template:Treweeke Mall
- Template:Woodroffe Mall
These re-qualify as SD candidates because they make juicy Crit 1's. --
06:16, 17 April 2010 (BST)
- Keep - Not Crit 1 as they are not duplicates. The two template types are different sizes and allow different information to be added. --
.
. <== DDR Approved Editor 10:12, 17 April 2010 (BST)
Crit 10s
Now these may be Subst templates, so someone like Aichon may need to check. Anything that said it was subst, I skipped, but there may be some others in here.
Template:PANTHER Barricade plan
--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 20:32, 16 April 2010 (BST)
- Keep - I love these mass posts of yours, because it only needs a single keep. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 20:36, 16 April 2010 (BST)
- Why, may I ask?--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 20:37, 16 April 2010 (BST)
- At least one is a group page and should be on A/MR rather than here and more than half are less than a month old and you haven't even taken the time to poke the author of more than half of these to point out that we delete unincluded templates on this wiki. He'll notice that one's missing at some point and recreate the lot, causing him more work and potentially another case here if he again doesn't stick them on a page. And so the cycle will go on and on. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 20:50, 16 April 2010 (BST)
- Ones requiring moves put on A/MR. Original author of most contacted. Everything left should be in order. The PANTHER one has been duped elsewhere, and saying I should wait a month is a stupid argument because the criterion is for a week.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:13, 16 April 2010 (BST)
- Wait, you admit that you were incompetently putting pages up for deletion that shouldn't be here and you want to quibble over allowing newbies a bit longer to store their work? It's a good job we have you enforcing these deadlines, or we'd run out of diskspace, which is expensive. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 22:23, 16 April 2010 (BST)
- Umm, no?--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 23:17, 16 April 2010 (BST)
- Wait, you admit that you were incompetently putting pages up for deletion that shouldn't be here and you want to quibble over allowing newbies a bit longer to store their work? It's a good job we have you enforcing these deadlines, or we'd run out of diskspace, which is expensive. --
- Ones requiring moves put on A/MR. Original author of most contacted. Everything left should be in order. The PANTHER one has been duped elsewhere, and saying I should wait a month is a stupid argument because the criterion is for a week.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:13, 16 April 2010 (BST)
- At least one is a group page and should be on A/MR rather than here and more than half are less than a month old and you haven't even taken the time to poke the author of more than half of these to point out that we delete unincluded templates on this wiki. He'll notice that one's missing at some point and recreate the lot, causing him more work and potentially another case here if he again doesn't stick them on a page. And so the cycle will go on and on. --
- Why, may I ask?--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 20:37, 16 April 2010 (BST)
- Delete The funny thing about that one single keep vote,... is that someone else would be entitled to come along and vote delete. -Poodle of DoomM!
T 22:35, 16 April 2010 (BST)
- Thing is, you don't get it. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 22:38, 16 April 2010 (BST)
- Thing is,... your always welcome to piss the hell off. -Poodle of DoomM! T 02:44, 17 April 2010 (BST)
- No, see, a single vote for 'keep' means these can no longer be deleted via Speedy Deletions and have to go through regular Deletions for two weeks.
02:46, 17 April 2010 (BST)
- No see,... I did understand... thing is,... I can still vote delete.... and after two weeks, and enough delete votes,... his one keep vote didn't mean shit. His overall intent is to be a condescending ass. -Poodle of DoomM! T 02:56, 17 April 2010 (BST)
- No, you don't understand. By voting keep I stop these being deleted for long enough for the author to be asked. Your delete however can mean that he can put them on a page and still be deleted even though they're in use. You could be depriving a user of their work even though they're using it because you have no comprehension of the system. Why do you think this hasn't been moved to the normal deletions page for two weeks already? Because I can retract my keep at any time if the author decides he doesn't want them. I understand the system, you don't and your petulant behaviour can have unintended consequences because you fail to understand the system. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 10:17, 17 April 2010 (BST)
- No, you don't understand. By voting keep I stop these being deleted for long enough for the author to be asked. Your delete however can mean that he can put them on a page and still be deleted even though they're in use. You could be depriving a user of their work even though they're using it because you have no comprehension of the system. Why do you think this hasn't been moved to the normal deletions page for two weeks already? Because I can retract my keep at any time if the author decides he doesn't want them. I understand the system, you don't and your petulant behaviour can have unintended consequences because you fail to understand the system. --
- No see,... I did understand... thing is,... I can still vote delete.... and after two weeks, and enough delete votes,... his one keep vote didn't mean shit. His overall intent is to be a condescending ass. -Poodle of DoomM!
- No, see, a single vote for 'keep' means these can no longer be deleted via Speedy Deletions and have to go through regular Deletions for two weeks.
- Thing is,... your always welcome to piss the hell off. -Poodle of DoomM!
- Thing is, you don't get it. --
With unused templates, Yon, stick the {{speedydelete}} tag on too, and see if anyone comes a-runnin. That's what I usually do on the rar occasion we purge the UnusedTemplates.. --
01:25, 17 April 2010 (BST)
Out of curiosity, what makes you think I can check to see if templates are subst'd? I wouldn't have any idea where to start with something like that, aside from checking the contribs for people that are in the history of those templates, which would take days. Wish I could help with an easy fix though. I suppose we could ask Rooster if such a thing is possible, but I don't see how. —Aichon— 06:33, 17 April 2010 (BST)
Served Speedy Deletions
Whittenside Cemeteries
--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 20:02, 16 April 2010 (BST)
Crit 4
Category:DB subpages--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 20:07, 16 April 2010 (BST)
Hollomstown Wastelands
--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 19:27, 16 April 2010 (BST)
Image:Bloodline.gif
Uploaded it, won't be needed... shame really. -Poodle of DoomM! 
T 03:49, 15 April 2010 (BST)
- Deleted ~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 03:52, 15 April 2010 (BST)
Dummy
Malton College of Medicine/medic runs/Eastonwood dummy is a dummy page used only by me when setting up a new site for MCM. --Sherry talk MCM 00:15, 15 April 2010 (BST)
 |
EATEN |
00:48, 15 April 2010 (BST)crit 1 sigh. why can't we delete these on sight again? --
06:11, 14 April 2010 (BST)
- Because we've had sysops that used such abilities to force their own opinion on the community and cover up their own misconduct. Crit 9. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 07:41, 14 April 2010 (BST)
- Really? Are there any examples? -- 08:36, 14 April 2010 (BST)
- Nubis, Hagnat, Bob. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 08:38, 14 April 2010 (BST)
- I only meant things like crit 9's (yet another of the crits which overlaps with crit 1), so I guess hagnat might be a perpetrator, haven't read through his a/m archives enough to remember. -- 09:10, 14 April 2010 (BST)
- Um, does this need renaming? 15:23, 14 April 2010 (BST)
- No. It's in the template space, not the main space. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 15:24, 14 April 2010 (BST)
- No. It's in the template space, not the main space. --
- Um, does this need renaming?
- I only meant things like crit 9's (yet another of the crits which overlaps with crit 1), so I guess hagnat might be a perpetrator, haven't read through his a/m archives enough to remember. -- 09:10, 14 April 2010 (BST)
- Nubis, Hagnat, Bob. --
- Really? Are there any examples? -- 08:36, 14 April 2010 (BST)
2010-04-12
Could you please delete User:Alton/Character_Name? I've created this page by accident. Thanks in advance! --Alton 18:42, 12 April 2010 (BST)
|
EATEN |
18:48, 12 April 2010 (BST)Crit 8
This page, thanks --
TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 19:50, 11 April 2010 (BST)
- Deleted~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 21:28, 11 April 2010 (BST)
Crit 14
Crit 14 is DDR being a smartarse and spoiling perfectly good lulz. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 09:46, 11 April 2010 (BST)
- But it says in the land of lubbadubs that to be crit 14 you have to supply a link to the previous A/AOFUB case this featured on... -- 09:49, 11 April 2010 (BST)
- You do realise that you've doomed Ross to eternal torment? There's now a permanent link to that page here that can't be removed due to substitute text being used. Poor guy can never get rid of a red link with his name in it due to you :P -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 09:57, 11 April 2010 (BST)
- You do realise that you've doomed Ross to eternal torment? There's now a permanent link to that page here that can't be removed due to substitute text being used. Poor guy can never get rid of a red link with his name in it due to you :P --
Journal:Menschen Metzger
crit 7--Menschen Metzger 23:30, 9 April 2010 (BST)
|
EATEN |
23:32, 9 April 2010 (BST)User Page
User:Kliqueman & User_talk:Kliqueman --Kliqueman 18:05, 8 April 2010 (BST)
Talk:Paranormal Defense Initiative
Missed talk page of one speedily deleted earlier. -Poodle of DoomM! T 22:32, 7 April 2010 (BST)
Paranormal Defense Initiative
Page was blanked by the original author. I assume he wants it gone... -Poodle of DoomM! T 13:26, 7 April 2010 (BST)
- I think so too. Thanks. Done. -- 13:33, 7 April 2010 (BST)
Renaissance
Hmm, in development since Jan 09 an one sentence. Delete methinks. --
03:24, 5 April 2010 (BST)
lots of fails
Image:Jägermeister.JPG, Image:Jägermeister.PNG, Image:Jägermeister.jpg, Image:Jägermeister.png, all need to be deleted as unused (and unusable) crit 1's of Image:Jagermeister.jpg. --
12:55, 2 April 2010 (BST)
|
EATEN |
- Also, I almost deleted this page too by accident. I'm a silly moo. :( 13:19, 2 April 2010 (BST)
Roftwood Wastelands
Demerged.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 21:05, 1 April 2010 (BST)
|
EATEN |
21:08, 1 April 2010 (BST)Talk:Edgecombe Parks
Missed talk page by Mis. :P —Aichon— 01:35, 1 April 2010 (BST)
|
EATEN |
01:37, 1 April 2010 (BST)Edgecombe Parks
Demerged.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 21:31, 31 March 2010 (BST)
|
EATEN |
21:35, 31 March 2010 (BST)
