|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Spam|1|0|7}}
| |
| {{Suggestion Navigation}} | | {{Suggestion Navigation}} |
| {{TOCright}} | | {{TOCright}} |
Line 55: |
Line 54: |
| <br clear=both> | | <br clear=both> |
| ---- | | ---- |
| | <noinclude> |
| | {{SugVoteRules}} |
| | |
| | |
| | [[Category:Current Suggestions]] |
| | |
| | </noinclude> |
Revision as of 10:16, 20 August 2010
20100820 Auto attack toggle switch
Purple greg thims 09:56, 20 August 2010 (BST)
Suggestion type
Combat
Suggestion scope
Everyone
Suggestion description
I DID, in-fact, read almost all of the rejected suggestions, and their where two, quite reasonable, main arguments against an automatic counter-attack system.
1.) Players would not be able to choose where their Action Points (AP) would be spent. This is fixed in the suggestion heading. A toggle switch. Genius no?
2.) Lower ranked players would not be able to get very far in the game. I hope you as the designers and programmers would figure this out, but I have come up with a series of solutions.
i. Make the counter attack a percentage hit chance, depending on damage to your max HP. That might sound confusing.
For example, if player Z has a max HP of 12, and is hit for 3 damage, and player X has a max of 20 HP and is hit by 4, player Z has a larger chance of being struck back. (player Z was struck for 3/12th of his max hp, and player X was hit for 4/20th. Z - 1/4 X - 1/5)
ii. Only allow counter attacks when a certain amount of HP has been lost. See it as some sort of 'Ditch effort' or 'Last Stand' if you will.
iii. Only allow counter attacks on a people who are 30% below your level, and above. For example, Player Z is level 10. He can counter attacks from player X, who is level 8, but not from Player Q, who is only at level 6.
THIS IS NOT JUST ANOTHER REQUEST FOR AUTO ATTACK. IT IS A COMPROMISE.
Voting Section
Voting Rules
|
Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped.
- # justification ~~~~
Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.
|
The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.
|
Keep Votes
- Keep I think it is a great idea. I hope some people feel the same way.--User:Purple greg thims/signature. 11.06, 20 august 2010 (BST)
Kill Votes
Spam/Dupe Votes
- Incomplete You haven't specified a number of key things. What is the percentage chance? Is this a new skill or would all people have it automatically? Do zombies get the same chance? Can I turn it off if I don't want it? Take it to Developing Suggestions Please --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 10:14, 20 August 2010 (BST)
- Incomplete - And based around a fundamentally flawed concept.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 10:17, 20 August 2010 (BST)
- As Above - lolwtfbbq --Thadeous Oakley 10:27, 20 August 2010 (BST)
- Spam - Call it what it is. Spam. Given some thought, it may be possible to make auto-attacks work, but this suggestion isn't in the ballpark yet (e.g. a toggle switch solves nothing), and is another prime example of why Developing Suggestions should be used for all suggestions before they're taken to voting. —Aichon— 10:41, 20 August 2010 (BST)
- spam - i barely know what you're talking about. -- 11:00, 20 August 2010 (BST)
- CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 11:01, 20 August 2010 (BST)
- what is this i dont even -- Adward 11:08, 20 August 2010 (BST)
Voting Rules
|
Advice to Suggesters
- Adding options to your suggestion is not good practice. Others will not vote on the options, only the main body; please don't ask them to do so.
- Once you have posted your suggestion, it is considered complete. Altering the suggestion mechanics after voting has begun nullifies existing votes, and is considered an abuse of the suggestions system. Doing so will result in your suggestion being removed from the voting system to removed suggestions, where you can work out the details and resubmit later if you desire. It is preferred that you remove your own suggestion and resubmit a new version with changes, if changes are needed.
- "Notes" added for clarification purposes, and correcting spelling/typos are permitted. When considering adding a clarification note, it is often better for all parties involved, for the author to remove the suggestion and resubmit it with the clarification included for the voters who have already placed their votes.
Advice to Voters
- You are voting on Suggestions, not Users. The text of your vote should not personally attack or denigrate the user who has submitted it... no matter how ridiculous the idea. Flaming and/or Trolling will not be tolerated.
- Before voting please read the Suggestions Dos and Do Nots and Frequently Suggested Ideas Page to read about concepts that have been generally considered unworkable in the past. You do not need to follow the guidelines on these pages but they are worth consideration before casting a vote.
- One vote per user. No exceptions. You cannot use multiple wiki accounts to vote on a suggestion.
- To Vote, use the [edit] button at the top of the voting section, then enter your vote in the the proper format to the end of the relevant section (keep/kill/spam).
- It is strongly recommended that voters (especially in the kill/spam sections) justify their vote to help others understand the reason they disagree. Feedback helps new suggesters get a feel for what the community does and does not want included in Urban Dead, and a deeper understanding of the balance needed for a workable suggestion.
- Votes must include a signature in order to be considered valid votes. To sign a vote, use --~~~~. Please remember to sign your votes! Unsigned votes will be deleted after 30 minutes or when found.
- Each Suggestion will be open to voting for two (2) weeks, measured from the suggestion's Timestamp, unless it is a Dupe or Spam. If, at the end of that time, there are two thirds (2/3) more Keep votes than Kill votes, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Reviewed Suggestions page. Otherwise, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Rejected Suggestions page.
|
Rules for Discussions
Votes are NOT the place to discuss Suggestions. This page and archived suggestion pages only to be used for the Suggesting and subsequent Voting of these suggestions. If you wish to discuss the suggestion or vote here, please use this page's Talk page (Suggestion talk:20100820 Auto attack toggle switch). Suggestions do not have to be submitted in order to discuss them. Developing Suggestions can be used to workshop possible suggestions before they are submitted.
|
Valid Votes
- Keep, for Suggestions that you believe have merit.
- Kill, for Suggestions that you believe do not have merit. If you need to discuss a rule fix, use the discussion page.
- Spam, for the most ridiculous suggestions.
- Suggestions can be removed with Spam votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks.
- Spam votes are not a "strong kill", they are simply here to prevent the utterly ridiculous from clogging up the system. If you do not like the idea, and it's not some crazy uber power or something else ridiculous, VOTE KILL, NOT SPAM. Spam votes will be counted as Kill when votes are tallied.
- Dupe, for Suggestions that are exact or very close duplicates of previous suggestions. For a Dupe vote to be valid, a link must be provided to the original suggestion.
- Dupe votes can be used to remove suggestions as described on the cycling suggestions page. Dupe votes will not be counted when votes are tallied.
- Humourous, for suggestions that are obviously intended to be satirical, or of comedic value only.}}
- Suggestions can be removed with Humourous votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks.
|
Invalid Votes
- Server Load and Programming Complexity are NOT very good Kill reasons. You are voting on the merit of the suggestion and whether or not you think it belongs in the game. Server load/complexity issues are up to Kevan to decide.
- X should be implemented first is not a valid reason for a vote. You are voting on the merit of THIS suggestion, not how it compares to others.
- Votes that do not have reasoning behind them are invalid. You MUST justify your vote.
|
Comments
- Re may be used to comment on a vote. Only the original author and the person being REd can comment. Comments are restricted to a single comment per vote, and it is expected that Re comments be as short as possible. Reing every kill vote is considered abuse of the Re comment. A Re does not count as a vote, and any subsequent discussion not part of the Re comment should be held on the discussion page if there is any extended commenting.
- Note is used by System Operators to invalidate trolling-based votes. Only Sysops may remove troll-based votes and they do so with a strikeout <s></s> in order to preserve the trolling removal for posterity. The voter may contest the strikeout with the Sysop that struck their vote out on the discussion page. Only a System Operator may remove a strikeout.
|
All Caps
Try to avoid YELLING, writing in bold, or using italics, except when emphasizing a point which has escaped other voters.
|
VOTING EXAMPLES
Keep Votes
- Keep - I am the author and I am allowed to vote once on my own suggestions. --MrSuggester 05:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT)
- Keep - Best. Suggestion. Evar. --Bob_Zombie 04:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT)
Keep - Good sugestion. no signature --FakeSuggester 07:39, 15 Nov 2005 (GMT)
Kill Votes
- Kill - This is a terrible idea, but you can totally fix it up. --NegativeGal 06:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
- Re - Please be more specific about how to fix it on the discussion page. --MrSuggester 14:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
- Re - Sure, I have detailed my proposed fixes here. --NegativeGal 23:38, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
Kill - You will eat my poopie and love it! --PooEater 11:12, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT)
- Note - Inane vote removed. Defend in discussion. --DaModerator 11:13, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT)
Spam/Dupe Votes
- Spam - Kung Fu CB Mama on Wheels is an inappropriate Survivor Class. --NoFunAtAll 09:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
- Dupe - Duplicate Suggestion --AnotherSuggester 05:01, 14 Nov 2005 (GMT)
|