User talk:Vapor: Difference between revisions
Krazy Monkey (talk | contribs) (→Ghosts: new section) |
(→Ghosts) |
||
Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
I don't think that's going to work. =/ Seems like the software is rejecting the broken character completely. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 17:36, 23 April 2011 (BST) | I don't think that's going to work. =/ Seems like the software is rejecting the broken character completely. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 17:36, 23 April 2011 (BST) | ||
:Meh. It was worth a shot. ~[[Image:Vsig.png|link=User:Vapor]] <sub>17:38, 23 April 2011</sub> |
Revision as of 16:38, 23 April 2011
you might go blind--
bitch 17:34 16 March 2011 (UTC)
look >-- ▧ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 12:47, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Disclaimer
This user does not give a fuck |
Da Rules
Add new topics wherever you damn well please or if you're lazy click here. That is unless you are Sexualharrison, in which case, click here
how did you get the small date/time stamp
with a templated sig? mother fucker? -- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking
bitch 04:16 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- I have the following sexy ass damn code in my preferences:
- {{SUBST:Nosubst|User:Vapor/sig}} <sub>{{subst:LOCALTIME}}, {{subst:LOCALDAY}} {{subst:LOCALMONTHNAME}} {{subst:LOCALYEAR}}</sub>
- I also have the Raw signatures (without automatic link) box checked cuz that's how I roll and I always use three tildes when I want to sign my shit. Word. ~ 05:03, 14 April 2011
ahhh! and thad. don't you just love him? i wonder how much he gets beat up in real life? -- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking
bitch 15:23 15 April 2011 (UTC)
- no i think i like the old way better as one line. :/ --User:Sexualharrison15:33, 15 April 2011
- but it's good to know i can do it if I feel like playing around more with the boobs. :P-- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking bitch 15:36 15 April 2011 (UTC)
- Who doesn't feel like playing with more boobs? I've actually changed mine now (at least temporarily) to help cut down some of the template calls on the admin pages. I really liked not cluttering up discussion with sig code but if it helps not break pages, I'll take one for the team I guess. ~ Vapor ~ 15:43, 15 April 2011
- Testing. ~ ~ 16:18, 15 April 2011
- Wasn't there a case where we ruled that kind of sig was vandalism? Or did that change when I wasn't looking? --Karekmaps?! 04:44, 16 April 2011 (BST)
- Don't know. It's not against policy I don't think. I didn't go digging through old VB cases before I changed it. I can't imagine ruling vandalism on something like it, though. What grounds? ~ ~ 06:57, 16 April 2011
- Will peruse and get back to you. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 12:39, 16 April 2011 (BST)
- Iscariot had a similar one (may still have it as his sig). I found them troublesome, because the only way you can check who made the comment, is to check the history, or click on the link. We should be able to tell, just by mouseovering the link, who made a comment. Some wiki gurus have found a way around it, I think, so that mouseovering the image shows a link to the userpage. I don't think anyone bothered to send Iscariot, or anyone else, to A/VB for it though -- boxy talk • teh rulz 12:50 16 April 2011 (BST)
- Basically, the arguement is that a link to your user page is required in your sig. A redirect from an image page doesn't exactly fit the criterian. It's not a problem when it's obvious who's sig it is (ie. if the image spells out the name, or a close approximation), but it has the potential to be used to be intentionally misleading -- boxy talk • teh rulz 12:53 16 April 2011 (BST)
- I remember that actually, found it cause of you archiving stuff. Link to that discussion and the solutions there in. Here is another instance of that being brought up. Found a few more too. The Burgan one looks relevant, not definite on that though, it's a Clarity issue like the sexylegsread A/VB case(that I didn't link here) brings up. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 14:33, 16 April 2011 (BST)
- I'll change it up a bit. ~ ~ 17:02, 16 April 2011
- Would it be acceptable if I used an image with my entire username in it without including an actual link to my user page. I'm trying to come up with something that is not templated yet does not subst a bunch of code when I sign. If I don't have the option to use only an image then I'll likely just go back to a templated sig. √^¶°® ™ 21:43, 16 April 2011
- I'll change it up a bit. ~ ~ 17:02, 16 April 2011
- --> ~ ~ 17:02, 16 April 2011 <-- this ? Mouseover it.-- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 22:59, 16 April 2011 (BST)
- I remember that actually, found it cause of you archiving stuff. Link to that discussion and the solutions there in. Here is another instance of that being brought up. Found a few more too. The Burgan one looks relevant, not definite on that though, it's a Clarity issue like the sexylegsread A/VB case(that I didn't link here) brings up. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 14:33, 16 April 2011 (BST)
- Will peruse and get back to you. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 12:39, 16 April 2011 (BST)
- Don't know. It's not against policy I don't think. I didn't go digging through old VB cases before I changed it. I can't imagine ruling vandalism on something like it, though. What grounds? ~ ~ 06:57, 16 April 2011
- Wasn't there a case where we ruled that kind of sig was vandalism? Or did that change when I wasn't looking? --Karekmaps?! 04:44, 16 April 2011 (BST)
- Testing. ~ ~ 16:18, 15 April 2011
- Who doesn't feel like playing with more boobs? I've actually changed mine now (at least temporarily) to help cut down some of the template calls on the admin pages. I really liked not cluttering up discussion with sig code but if it helps not break pages, I'll take one for the team I guess. ~ Vapor ~ 15:43, 15 April 2011
- but it's good to know i can do it if I feel like playing around more with the boobs. :P-- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking bitch 15:36 15 April 2011 (UTC)
- say wut? -- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking bitch 14:51 16 April 2011 (UTC)
wow it works! small date!!! ▧ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 22:17, 22 April 2011
- or you could just use the <small></small>code -- bitch 23:17, 22 April 2011
vgawikipage
made one, mostly cut'n'paste from C/vg -- ▧ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 19:17, 15 April 2011 (BST)
- Cool. I'll work on it an make it more NPOV. At the minimum, it needs to have an NPOV statement at the top of the page. ~ ~ 19:39, 15 April 2011
- Best SIG ever! (the blackish red one)... ps HAPPY 420! -- ▧ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 23:36, 19 April 2011 (BST)
How can I get a revive!? I've a genny n fuel and green lights and Malton Green and H34D5H07 KU5H, yet powerless... oh, one of those zeds is on 14HP. But really, Kevan should gimme an emergency revive in the spirit of 420! -- ▧ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 07:55, 20 April 2011 (BST)
- Get down on your knees and pray I guess. And while you're down there.... I used all my syringes on VGA unfortunately. I'd say hang onto that genny and fuel. We'll be right as rain in no time and Mester will be a shining green beacon of
hopedope once more. ~ 14:31, 20 April 2011
Okay, one of those two zeds is on 2HP -- ▧ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 15:13, 20 April 2011 (BST)
- and now final zed also on 2hp -- ▧ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 15:20, 20 April 2011 (BST)
if u kill it, i can leave while u repair, then let me in before putting cades up... -- ▧ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 15:21, 20 April 2011 (BST)
Out. Remember don't cade till I'm in -- ▧ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 15:27, 20 April 2011 (BST)
- Nice repairs! Loving this live action! -- ▧ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 15:27, 20 April 2011 (BST)
- Well if we can just get through the rest of the day without and VGA douchebaggery I'll be happy. Still 15 hours of 420 here in my neck of the woods. This is how I'm celebrating:
My local pub sells glassware every Wednesday with the purchase of a pint. Today's glass is the one above. ~ 15:49, 20 April 2011
- what a, uh, charming thing for a pub to do. only 8 hours left in london, but everyday is kinda 4/20. if u like cheech&chong u may like these - http://undergroundsoles.com/2011/03/todd-bratrud-x-nike-sb-dunk-high-cheech-chong-420/ -- ▧ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 15:54, 20 April 2011 (BST)
- Well, our deaths came as expected, but at least Mester was lit up for some of 4/20. In fact, that was the only thing Sattano had to do in Malton during 2011. It's a shame that Dumbwit doesn't show Green Lights http://iamscott.net/1303335849435.html -- ▧ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 09:23, 21 April 2011 (BST)
all i gotta do is copy yer code to mah page.
and the wiki ogres swoop in and fix it for ya? this is gonna be every lazy coders dream!
Code Stealer | |
This user is a wiki code stealer, and probably stealing your sidebar while you read this. |
are back!-- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking
bitch 22:05 17 April 2011 (UTC)
WARNING!!! | |
You are in srs danger of becoming a heterosexual. Blow more men. Poof. |
i was thinking of you as more a wikiz fairy... you are too helpful to be an ogre.--
bitch 17:08 19 April 2011 (UTC)
- Nah. I'm more of a WikiSloth. I'm a pretty devout supporter of Don't-give-a-fuckism. ~ 17:48, 19 April 2011
MediaWiki:Ipbreason-dropdown
I think you may have made a typo, I'm not exactly sure what a spambit is but I have a feeling spambot is more what you were going for? --Karekmaps 2.0?! 13:49, 22 April 2011 (BST)
- Nope, not a typo. Spambit is a colloquialism that began 2 years ago when Cheese accidentally pressed the "i" key instead of the "o" on his keyboard and it has stuck ever since. We even have an article dedicated to it: Spambit Hunters. I think including it on the Ipbreason-dropdown gives our wiki some personalization and makes the very mundane task of banning spambits a little bit more fun. I don't really want to change it. ~ 14:13, 22 April 2011
fine
you don't like my big messages :P well go fuck yourself!--
bitch 14:55, 22 April 2011
- Hey I left them there for a whole 2 days before nuking them. You should be happy I don't have a talk page rule preventing you from posting on my talk page. Tha banhammah will drop. :P ~ 14:58, 22 April 2011
- you don't have the guts to do eeet!--bitch 14:59, 22 April 2011
I'm testing something
This is only a test. ~ 17:36, 22 April 2011
This is yet another test
But I'm not feeling hopeful. ~ 17:40, 22 April 2011
- Ok apparently you can't override edit summaries using &summary= when new also using §ion=new. Damn. That'd be cool. ~ 17:41, 22 April 2011
- now you can suck both my balls! happy? :P -- bitch18:14, 22 April 2011
- Ok apparently you can't override edit summaries using &summary= when new also using §ion=new. Damn. That'd be cool. ~ 17:41, 22 April 2011
yer gay
supa dupa gay--
bitch 18:10, 22 April 2011
- poof -- bitch 23:19, 22 April 2011
- Oh, the irony. ~ Kempy “YaketyYak” | ◆◆◆ | CAPD | 23:49, 22 April 2011 (BST)
Ghosts
I don't think that's going to work. =/ Seems like the software is rejecting the broken character completely. -- Cheese 17:36, 23 April 2011 (BST)