User talk:BobBoberton

This Here's A Talk Page! New edits go right at the bottom; use level two (==) headers, please! Also, please sign your posts and understand I may baleete your comments from time to time. Suggestion Talk Hey man, you commented on my suggestion but did you read my reply? Your point is that caution should take extra AP - well guess what, players without free running have that risk removed without having to do anything extra, while someone with free running must take extra AP to remove that risk. Does that sound right to you? --ScaredPlayer 01:52, 26 March 2009 (UTC) Yes, but they can't free run. And like whoever-it-was said, toggling Free Running would be a better suggestion. --Bob Boberton TF / DW 01:53, 26 March 2009 (UTC) Thank you for the explanation Bob, that's all I was really looking for. Perhaps someone will make that suggestion in the future hopefully. --ScaredPlayer 01:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC) Oh, and I would have suggested implementing either toggling FR or removing fall damage, but the suggestion tips said not to give people choices. I'm actually happy with either-or. --ScaredPlayer 02:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC) Justifications Your thoughts?--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 18:50, 30 May 2009 (BST) Everything I would've wanted to say has already been said. Besides the "It's not hard to justify yourself well" thing. --Bob Boberton TF / DW 19:40, 30 May 2009 (BST) I meant go there and say things instead of other places. That way it's all in one convenient place. :( --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 19:44, 30 May 2009 (BST) Brb editing that page then! --Bob Boberton TF / DW 19:45, 30 May 2009 (BST) Yay!--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 19:48, 30 May 2009 (BST) Done and done! I expanded it a little so I look like I might actually know what I'm talking about. --Bob Boberton TF / DW 19:51, 30 May 2009 (BST) Zombie Lord Since what neither of us was saying had anything to do with anything but us attacking each other, I believe I am justified. I didn't remove anyone else's "dealings" with him and I didn't remove posts that were on topic, even if they were attacks. And I think Suicide just had an oopsie there. No big deal. What it boils down to is useless garbage that was filling the page unecessarily and wrecking the suggestions in which they appeared.--Pesatyel 00:34, 1 June 2009 (BST) Also I love trolling the trolly troll too. If he wants to insult and disrespect other users, he'll have no respect from me. --Bob Boberton TF / DW 00:35, 1 June 2009 (BST) Which is completely alright and within the boundaries. But I do urge you two not to just continue the insult war, look for a way to end it.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 00:38, 1 June 2009 (BST) I'll direct the trollwar towards an end when he starts shaping up and doesn't feel the need to curse in capital letters every other sentence. ;) --Bob Boberton TF / DW 00:46, 1 June 2009 (BST) But an arbies case will end it now, with just a bit more work that's over on A/A. If he chooses not to participate himself, someone will be choosen to represent him, so either way this is ended. :) --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 00:48, 1 June 2009 (BST) Thanks for the backup. That dude just wow, I'm not sure what that dude's on. Did you see him answer my question? Well whatever, I posited my question to him in order to point out a flaw in his suggestion (and, maybe attack him a little too, sure, but this time legitimately). Whether he answers or not (which he'll just say I can't read anyway), I'm done.--Pesatyel 01:01, 1 June 2009 (BST) Hey Sorry if you felt attacked. I didn't mean you, it would be cyber.--Thadeous Oakley, Hurf durf I liek to blink!! 19:14, 1 June 2009 (BST) It's alright. I hardly take anything on the open internet seriously anyway haha. ;) --Bob Boberton TF / DW 20:22, 1 June 2009 (BST) Oh. OH! Cyberbob! See, now this is why I regret having picked a common-name Internet alias. Hah. --Bob Boberton TF / DW 20:29, 1 June 2009 (BST) Hi Bob, thanks for the warm welcome. Hope to see you in The Preston Arms for a few pints. Catchy. Dead Historical Status Hey there. I wanted to talk to you about the voting on the Dead's historical status without clogging up the page. I think this is a really interesting discussion. For instance, in my own group, only 2 players remain from when I first joined, and the original founder was gone before I got there. But we've got 30 members and we're going strong. How do you define a group in an online environment where members and leaders come and go?--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 04:44, 14 June 2009 (BST) Help I know I need to make it known, but uh, I don't really know anyone... I told H.A.R.D., and can't think of anyone else to tell...--The Shoemaker Talk Red Faction 19:13, 15 June 2009 (BST) Linkthewindow posted a notice on the main Hollomstown page. That should suffice. --Bob Boberton TF / DW 19:31, 15 June 2009 (BST) WN Stuff Hey, Bob. I'd just like you to know, there are quicker ways to get those WN and Wn? templates on the pages without having to sign. Just use {{subst:WN}} and {{subst:Wn?}}. It saves a hell of a lot of time, and makes WN sprees go a lot quicker. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs (status:‎Mudkip!) 00:51, 16 June 2009 (BST)