Suggestion:20100316 Flares or Flare Guns?

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search


Suggestion Navigation
Suggestion Portal
Current SuggestionsSuggestions up for VotingClothes Suggestions
Cycling SuggestionsPeer ReviewedUndecidedPeer RejectedHumorous
Suggestion AdviceTopics to Avoid and WhyHelp, Developing and Editing


20100316 Flares or Flare Guns?

Thomas Orion 02:18, 16 March 2010 (UTC)


Suggestion type
Equipment Improvement

Suggestion scope
Survivors

Suggestion description
Flare guns, Scouts start with them; others find them by searching various areas. Let's look at it logically though. How often even in the event of a Zombie Apocalypse are you going to see a guy running around with 8 Flare Guns sticking out of God only knows where? I suggest a small change.

Individual Flares Instead of holding ungodly amounts of flare guns in your inventory you could add a new item called a "Flare". Flares are the same size as shotgun shells and would equal the same amount of encumbrance. An example follows;

Flare Used by Flare Gun Contents 1 Flare

Locations Fire Stations (5%), Mall Hardware Stores (2%/3%), Armories (3%), Stadiums (2%), Police Departments (1%)

Encumbrance 2% / 0% when loaded Description A single Flare. It costs 1 AP to reload a Flare into the Flare Gun. A Flare Gun can hold at most 1 Flare.


Voting Section

Voting Rules
Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped.
# justification ~~~~

Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.


Keep Votes


Kill Votes

  1. Kill - The reloading of a two-shot, 65% to-hit shotgun is a leech of AP, giving reload costs for one-shot flare guns, rather than keeping them disposable one-shot weapons, is going to be unfun. For hate's sake I spit my last breath at thee 02:25, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
  2. Kill - Honestly, this wouldn't change the game that much, the encumbrance of a flare pistol isn't great enough to warrent this change. Plus the dilution of search rates would mess this game up bad.--Pothead66 03:10, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
  3. Kill - Look it is interesting, but I like lighting my victims on fire with gas and flares... I don't want the added difficulty of reloading mid fight. -Devorac 03:40, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
  4. Kill - Diluting search rates for other items, additional AP expenditure, and more encumbrance to manage (since we'd probably want to keep the gun itself around). Losing propositions all around. Also, why aren't the search rates for the Flare Gun specified with this suggestion? You'd probably want to lower them to compensate for the fact that you'd need less of them. Aichon 03:53, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
  5. Kill Author kill, You guys make good points, I wouldn't want to mess up the game.--Thomas Orion 16:23, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
  6. Kill - Needed more development.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 19:23, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
    3"'Kill"' - Makes things too complicated --Radio Girl 02:33, 18 March 2010 (UTC) number your vote properly -- 02:46, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
  7. Kill - as all criticism -- 02:46, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
  8. Kill - I might be convinced to agree with the changing of flare gun's name to flare, but this is far to complicated. --TripleU 05:50, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
  9. Kill - All the above --V darkstar 16:38, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
  10. Kill - Even if flares would become an interesting item with future changes (instead of the junk it is right now), this suggestion would simply make things more complicated for a negligible bit of extra realism. --Spiderzed 19:42, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
  11. Kill - Nooooooo. Flares are nowhere near useful enough to warrant a change that would only make things more complicated in the name of realism, especially when you consider that there's no way a human being could carry ONE portable generator around, let alone a maximum of five, and yet that is permissible in the game. --Fujiko Mine 01:44, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Spam/Dupe Votes

  1. Spam - Your logic is that it's unrealistic to see someone walk around with loads of flare guns? But there's nothing wrong with carrying five generators? Are you ready for the main reason this is spam? You're diluting your own search rates. Your ammo encumbrance is the same as a currently loaded flare but now requires an extra item (the gun) to work. How many empty guns do you want to find before you'll realise that the current system is supremely better for survivors? -- To know the face of God is to know madness....Praise knowledge! Mischief! Mayhem! The Rogues Gallery!. <== DDR Approved Editor 02:44, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
  2. Spam - Lots of folk already drop flares as rubbish, messing up peoples search rates and making them pay extra AP to load will make flare better how? --Honestmistake 09:24, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
  3. Spam - As above. -- Cheese 22:17, 16 March 2010 (UTC)



Voting Rules
Current Suggestions

Advice to Suggesters

  1. Adding options to your suggestion is not good practice. Others will not vote on the options, only the main body; please don't ask them to do so.
  2. Once you have posted your suggestion, it is considered complete. Altering the suggestion mechanics after voting has begun nullifies existing votes, and is considered an abuse of the suggestions system. Doing so will result in your suggestion being removed from the voting system to removed suggestions, where you can work out the details and resubmit later if you desire. It is preferred that you remove your own suggestion and resubmit a new version with changes, if changes are needed.
  3. "Notes" added for clarification purposes, and correcting spelling/typos are permitted. When considering adding a clarification note, it is often better for all parties involved, for the author to remove the suggestion and resubmit it with the clarification included for the voters who have already placed their votes.

Advice to Voters

  1. You are voting on Suggestions, not Users. The text of your vote should not personally attack or denigrate the user who has submitted it... no matter how ridiculous the idea. Flaming and/or Trolling will not be tolerated.
  2. Before voting please read the Suggestions Dos and Do Nots and Frequently Suggested Ideas Page to read about concepts that have been generally considered unworkable in the past. You do not need to follow the guidelines on these pages but they are worth consideration before casting a vote.
  3. One vote per user. No exceptions. You cannot use multiple wiki accounts to vote on a suggestion.
  4. To Vote, use the [edit] button at the top of the voting section, then enter your vote in the the proper format to the end of the relevant section (keep/kill/spam).
  5. It is strongly recommended that voters (especially in the kill/spam sections) justify their vote to help others understand the reason they disagree. Feedback helps new suggesters get a feel for what the community does and does not want included in Urban Dead, and a deeper understanding of the balance needed for a workable suggestion.
  6. Votes must include a signature in order to be considered valid votes. To sign a vote, use --~~~~. Please remember to sign your votes! Unsigned votes will be deleted after 30 minutes or when found.
  7. Each Suggestion will be open to voting for two (2) weeks, measured from the suggestion's Timestamp, unless it is a Dupe or Spam. If, at the end of that time, there are two thirds (2/3) more Keep votes than Kill votes, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Reviewed Suggestions page. Otherwise, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Rejected Suggestions page.
Rules for Discussions

Votes are NOT the place to discuss Suggestions. This page and archived suggestion pages only to be used for the Suggesting and subsequent Voting of these suggestions. If you wish to discuss the suggestion or vote here, please use this page's Talk page (Suggestion talk:20100316 Flares or Flare Guns?). Suggestions do not have to be submitted in order to discuss them. Developing Suggestions can be used to workshop possible suggestions before they are submitted.

Valid Votes
  • Keep, for Suggestions that you believe have merit.
  • Kill, for Suggestions that you believe do not have merit. If you need to discuss a rule fix, use the discussion page.
  • Spam, for the most ridiculous suggestions.
Suggestions can be removed with Spam votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks.
Spam votes are not a "strong kill", they are simply here to prevent the utterly ridiculous from clogging up the system. If you do not like the idea, and it's not some crazy uber power or something else ridiculous, VOTE KILL, NOT SPAM. Spam votes will be counted as Kill when votes are tallied.
  • Dupe, for Suggestions that are exact or very close duplicates of previous suggestions. For a Dupe vote to be valid, a link must be provided to the original suggestion.
Dupe votes can be used to remove suggestions as described on the cycling suggestions page. Dupe votes will not be counted when votes are tallied.
  • Humourous, for suggestions that are obviously intended to be satirical, or of comedic value only.}}
Suggestions can be removed with Humourous votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks.
Invalid Votes
  • Server Load and Programming Complexity are NOT very good Kill reasons. You are voting on the merit of the suggestion and whether or not you think it belongs in the game. Server load/complexity issues are up to Kevan to decide.
  • X should be implemented first is not a valid reason for a vote. You are voting on the merit of THIS suggestion, not how it compares to others.
  • Votes that do not have reasoning behind them are invalid. You MUST justify your vote.
Comments
  • Re may be used to comment on a vote. Only the original author and the person being REd can comment. Comments are restricted to a single comment per vote, and it is expected that Re comments be as short as possible. Reing every kill vote is considered abuse of the Re comment. A Re does not count as a vote, and any subsequent discussion not part of the Re comment should be held on the discussion page if there is any extended commenting.
  • Note is used by System Operators to invalidate trolling-based votes. Only Sysops may remove troll-based votes and they do so with a strikeout <s></s> in order to preserve the trolling removal for posterity. The voter may contest the strikeout with the Sysop that struck their vote out on the discussion page. Only a System Operator may remove a strikeout.
All Caps

Try to avoid YELLING, writing in bold, or using italics, except when emphasizing a point which has escaped other voters.

VOTING EXAMPLES

Keep Votes

  1. Keep - I am the author and I am allowed to vote once on my own suggestions. --MrSuggester 05:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  2. Keep - Best. Suggestion. Evar. --Bob_Zombie 04:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  3. Keep - Good sugestion. no signature --FakeSuggester 07:39, 15 Nov 2005 (GMT)

Kill Votes

  1. Kill - This is a terrible idea, but you can totally fix it up. --NegativeGal 06:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
    • Re - Please be more specific about how to fix it on the discussion page. --MrSuggester 14:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
      • Re - Sure, I have detailed my proposed fixes here. --NegativeGal 23:38, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  2. Kill - You will eat my poopie and love it! --PooEater 11:12, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT)
    • Note - Inane vote removed. Defend in discussion. --DaModerator 11:13, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT)

Spam/Dupe Votes

  1. Spam - Kung Fu CB Mama on Wheels is an inappropriate Survivor Class. --NoFunAtAll 09:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  2. Dupe - Duplicate Suggestion --AnotherSuggester 05:01, 14 Nov 2005 (GMT)