User talk:Cornholioo

--Thadeous Oakley 19:25, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Nice one thad, trust you to jump on the {{WN}} bandwagon without seeing the contributions this user actually made, and help out at rectifying them. --

 

 

 

 

00:26, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

User Pages

Your character page can only be located in your user namespace, eg. User:Cornholioo. It cannot exist at Cornholioo, as as such it has been deleted. --

 

 

 

 

00:24, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

National Socialist Union/recruit

Orphaned Page

The following page(s) were orphaned, meaning they weren't linked from any other page on UDWiki. For house-keeping's sake, we are adding the link onto the relevant talk page. If you don't want the pages anymore just post them on the Deletions Page. You aren't required to do anything, but we'd appreciate if it you kept the link on any one of your pages. Please note that the link provided below will not remove the page from Orphaned Pages, so you'll still need to manually make a link for us. Thank you.

--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 18:45, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

vandalism

It is not ok to commit vandalism on my user page. That page is mine. You can discuss stuff on my talk page. I suppose that you got a bit carried away, and did not mean to break the rules. So I won't report it this time. --zyckde 21:06, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Warning

You've been warned for vandalisms and shit. Don't be doing it again, kk?--Big Cat 10:31, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

I didn't do this deliberately and have already appologized for this. I must say it's pretty sad this user and me have already solved this, and I still get the warning, though. --Cornholioo 12:55, 15 March, 2010 (UTC).

A/VB

When submitting a user for vandalism, you should post on the main page. You accidentally posted on the talk, which is used for discussion of cases by uninvolved parties. But, after reading what's happened, you should go to Arbitration instead, as Arbitration is used for editting disputes.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 17:36, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

A/A

Stop spamming A/A with silly cases please. If you want to "report" someone (as you requested), take them to A/VB. If you want to have something about a user's civility towards you changed, THEN you take it to A/A, but actually express that rather than complain about them swearing. And don't forget to sign, please, it makes a mess of things if not. --

 

 

 

 

06:34, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

I haven't got that much experience with reporting people. Thanks for the tip, I'll stick to it in the future. --Cornholioo 9:20, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Another request

Due to the subjective nature of groups on this wiki, we tend to not allow unwanted edits to group pages from outsiders of that group. As such, what you've done here is practically vandalism, and would usually be treated as such. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt and rather than deal with you officially, I'm going to give you one last warning: don't make unwanted and controversial edits onto other users group pages and/or user pages, especially those of which you are in conflict with in-game or on-wiki. You were already warned for this a week or so ago here, and the sysops of this wiki will most likely get less and less lenient if you keep committing the same offences.

Good luck in the future, and please try and deal with wiki diplomacy according to the rules we try and abide by. If you have any further questions, I'd be more than happy to help you out with them. Thanks, --

 

 

 

 

13:36, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

You missed one, namely here. Which makes three. --zyckde 14:01, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Am I not allowed to do that? Zyckde has done that too to the page of the NSU here: http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=National_Socialist_Union&diff=1668675&oldid=1667344 and here: http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=National_Socialist_Union&diff=1670706&oldid=1670105 and I don't believe he was warned for it either.

And I now know I'm not allowed to edit personal pages and I have already apologized for that. I didn't know I wasn't allowed to do that, and I didn't know I'm not allowed to edit other groups' pages as well... I didn't mean to break any rules. --Cornholioo 14:44, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Maybe you should do some research before you.. Oh, wait. You guys don't do that. Right. Infrastructure 15:02, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Oh yes we do. I knew he had a case against him. I just didn't knew that was involving the edit he made on the page of the NSU. Also, read the post carefully; it says: "I don't believe he was...", which means I wasn't sure. --Cornholioo 15:16, 25 March 2010.

Re: Racism

What you wrote isn't racism, I suppose. It's the whole silly "white pride" thing. White supremacists tend to view other ethnic groups as inferior. Thus, I actually removed your comment (Which was entirely meaningless) due to it being written by a racist, rather than it having any racist meaning. You were right. Happy now? Infrastructure 14:59, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

The word 'racist' is invited by Jews that use it to paralyze any way of thinking and debating; it's used in the same way as the word 'heretic' was used in the dark ages. Therefore I'd prefer you to react concerning the case, rather simply putting it away as 'racism'. Greetings, the Aryan man that never sleeps, --Cornholioo 2:00, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Fine. Not "racist" then. I don't really like the word anyway - We don't use terms such as "race" here. Discriminatist perhaps? And last time I checked, sleep was essential to your health. You should try it sometime. Infrastructure 14:20, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Same story. --Cornholioo 14:26, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

• Sigh* I give up. It's fortunate that I didn't live during the WW2 period. Infrastructure 14:32, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Recruitment ad

Your Recruitment ad for the National Socialist Union was removed because it lacked a timestamp (if you go to here, you can see that you did sign the ad, but you didn't timestamp it as well...use four tildes instead of three when signing). All ads on that page are required to have timestamps, that way we can keep track of how long they have been posted and can remove them whenever the timestamp has not been updated within the past two months. You are welcome to put the ad back up on the page, so long as you make sure to provide a valid timestamp with it. For your convenience, I've provided your code that I removed.

===[[National Socialist Union]] : National Socialist Survivors===	 
{|	 
|	 
{{:National Socialist Union/recruit}}	 
|}

Cheers. —Aichon— 01:02, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Ok, it should be alright now. --Cornholioo 1:29, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Looks good. Thanks. —Aichon—

Batavian

Lol, so i understand Amir was right in giving Batavian W. a strong warning when he entered Tolman during the battle of Krinks :D --zyckde 15:18, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

NSU

I may not exactly like you, your organization or your ideology, but that doesn't stop my brain from desperately craving order. Advice: In the group template, your goals no longer appear to be very accurate. Infrastructure 18:54, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

I appreciate the clarification. Infrastructure 12:48, 28 March 2010 (BST)

A quick heads up

Look at me being nice for a change. A word of warning, having multiple characters working together in the same group can get you barred from the game thanks to automatic countermeasures. See here for more info. As a rule of thumb make sure you keep your characters more than ten blocks away from each other. thanks. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 16:01, 30 March 2010 (BST)

I already knew. Thanks anyway. --Cornholioo 17:27, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Excellent --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 20:35, 30 March 2010 (BST)

The fuck?

Two things, why is a Nazi talking to me, and why would I giveyou my account info?--Sean Connolly 06:55, 6 April 2010 (BST)

If you must know...

My account is the same as my wiki. Sean Connolly. And I don't fear anyone who supports a fascist group that had its military power completely eliminated by Brits and couldn't even keep France in check.--Sean Connolly 03:03, 7 April 2010 (BST)

This is great!

Boy do I love playing with the heads of people who think they know stuff!
Sorry buddy, that kind of bull shit doesn't work on the apathetic. Especially when the apathetic have people who prove you wrong before they even try!
--Sean Connolly 03:50, 8 April 2010 (BST)
Have a good one!

Also, no countries are "Jewish controlled" or ever were, pretty much everyone hates on the poor little guys, and I've noticed that while you pretend to have some form of an intelligent manner in conversation, much of your grammar sucks and I haven't checked your spelling yet...

And isn't Poland capitalist? And technically, Nazi-Germany wasn't a country, Germany was, Nazis are a political group that misused religion and racial ethnicities (even though Hitler and many other Nazi officers had a jewish bloodline) as a means to gather a large number of people under the cause of a military takeover that foolishly followed the beliefs of an insane geologist who thought that a country was a living thing that needed more territory to 'gain sustenance'. And back to the capitalism thing, even under the Nazi rule, Germany was technically capitalist and communist, since communism is simply another word for socialism. Plus, if you put up a point to say that Germany wasn't 'technically' capitalist, you will also be most other countries are socialist. Hello, health care and social support for injured people? And seriously, deciding whether to kill someone because of their ethnicity or not based on moustache shape and size?
I'm sure there are plenty of other points I could make, but I'll save them up.

Forgot to sign again, oops. And that image on your user page is NOT a celtic cross. The celtic peoples (I say people because there was more than one group) were mostly pagan and didn't make crosses, and certainly none as simple as a circle and a cross. And I'm fairly sure the Nazi regime preferred the Aryan christianity religion/ethnicity, not Celtic or pagan. Thanks for insulting my bloodline.

And I apologize for ranting like a fat bastard but just because you have blue eyes and blonde hair doesn't mean you are of the Ayan ethnicity. Far more Aryans had brown hair than blonde or black. --Sean Connolly 08:15, 8 April 2010 (BST)

I would just like to point out that, as Mr. Connolly essentially said, there was a Nazi Germany as much as there is a Labour Britain, a Democrat America or a Moderate Sweden. Also, according to the almighty Wikipedia, destroyer of ignorance, the Celtic Cross was brought to Ireland by a saint. Nothing pagan with that thing, move along. And stop misusing other culture's symbols while you're at it. Infrastructure 09:37, 8 April 2010 (BST)

Celts and Germans are related to eachothers. 'Aryan people' is in fact another word for 'Germanic people'.

Genocide has never happend. But before we're going to discuss my ideals again (which I'd be happy to do over E-Mail, though) I'll say that my whole point was that Nazi-Germany defenitely did achieve anything during World War II. At the beginning they were the strongest individual country. I wouldn't underestimate their force. Though, we have not much to do with them, besides sharing the same ideology and admiring them.

Last time I checked, the word genocide refered to other events than the Holocaust. Infrastructure 11:56, 9 April 2010 (BST)

Seen as you're unable to think any further, I will explain. With 'Genocide has never happend', I ment to say: 'Nazi-Germany has never commited genocide'.

Besides that, the nazi regime didn't have an official state religion, however Hitler was raised Catholic. Todays day most neonazi's are pagan. Some even are convinced Christianity must disappear from Germanic countries. Some follow Wodanism (in a form of tradition, they don't pray/believe in life after death/etc). But I'm not going to press this further right here, I've made my point. --Cornholioo 18:49, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Ok, that's fucking it - Stay away from my ancestors, please. Infrastructure 11:56, 9 April 2010 (BST)

Don't pretend you have any ideals, Nazi scum. Nazism isn't an ideal. It's a disease. I have yet to meet a German that doesn't loathe pathetic little twits that have to wrap themselves in nationalism and racism. --Fenian 21:16, 8 April 2010 (BST)

Fenian, he's , what, Polish? Dutch? Not German. The whole screaming that he's Nazi scum thing sort of ruins the whole professional aspect of the conversation. And Celtic and Germanic are two completely different things. Actually, Germanic isn't an ethnicity, German is. Germanic is the language group including German, Ulseic, English, and many other languages. And what point did you make? I see no point that was presented, whether proven or not, just a collection of facts that were then feebly squirmed at by an infantile being who doesn't understand his own idealogy. Although, according to the dictionary, your genocide comment is correct, genocide is the complete elimination of an ethnic group, which has never happened. And why do you keep saying 'they were the stongest at the beginning'? Haven't we already proven that that doesn't mean anything? First blood has never been as important as last blood.--Sean Connolly 03:28, 9 April 2010 (BST)

You said: "And I don't fear anyone who supports a fascist group that had its military power completely eliminated by Brits and couldn't even keep France in check". I've made my point: Germany was dangerous at the beginning of World War II. That means they were not weak, thus "And I don't fear anyone who supports a fascist group that had its military power completely eliminated by Brits and couldn't even keep France in check", is a weak argument. Since Germany was dangerous. My comment is indeed correct, Nazi-Germany has never committed genocide. Your definition of genocide is wrong. If you believe 6 million Jews were systemically killed by Nazi-Germany, then you believe Nazi-Germany did commit genocide. I don't believe 6 million Jews were systematically killed by Nazi-Germany, so I don't believe they committed genocide. I'm going to delete this stuff now, since it doesn't belong here. Any further comments will be deleted as well. --Cornholioo 14:04, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

"Genocide is the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group." The dictionary definition is not exhaustive, far from it. The definition of wikipedia seems more fitting. The label "genocide" is a political label, applied to events by after a vote in the UN. Countries try to use the term genocide for political ends. It is in the UN constitution that the have to intervene when a genocide is going on. Therefor, the US are trying to label the past conflict in Kosovo and the present one in Sudan as such, because it is an excuse to intervene. The only undisputed genocide, is the one by the nazi's on European Jewry. --zyckde 11:52, 9 April 2010 (BST)