UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Archive/2011 03
This is the archive page for UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions.
Speedy Deletion Queue
There are currently no pages in the queue.
Served Speedy Deletions
Erepublik
c2 -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 02:46, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
And The 51 drunkards too, assuming it isn't a legit group, should probs wait a bit longer -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 03:11, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- Well, seeing that it was just created, I say we give it a day or two to see what happens. If the author adds more content, we can assume they're group pages. If not, then we delete away. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 03:15, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- One of them should at least go since they are dupes of one another. I'll contact the author. ~
03:22, 21 March 2011
- since Erepiblik is one of those browser based games they advertise up the arse around these parts, I highly doubt it's a group, compared to the other one which sounds reasonable -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 08:50, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- One of them should at least go since they are dupes of one another. I'll contact the author. ~
User blanked Erepublik after discussion on his talk page so I deleted it as scheduled. Crit 7 by proxy. ~ 15:24, 22 March 2011
User:Kempy/K27/Bounties Claimed: Page 1
No longer needed. Thank you. ~ Kempy
“YaketyYak” | ◆◆◆ | CAPD |
18:03, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
User:Kempy/K27/Bounties Claimed: Page 2
No longer needed. Thank you. ~ Kempy
“YaketyYak” | ◆◆◆ | CAPD |18:03, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
User:Kempy/K27/Bounties Claimed: Page 3
No longer needed. Thank you. ~ Kempy
“YaketyYak” | ◆◆◆ | CAPD |18:03, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Category:Cruzader Revive Hospital
Only thing in it is itself. -- Cheese 11:51, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Done, thanks cheese! -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 11:55, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
More unused stuff
Moar unused templates. -- Cheese 11:31, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah who likes muse anyway. mars volta ftw! -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 11:55, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Unused Templates
- Template:Eyehurter
- Template:Dulston Alliance Helper
- Template:Tumbleweedpart3
- Template:Pretzola
- Template:Pistola
- Template:Doublebarrel
Template:LondonNow used. -- Cheese 15:57, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Seeing how it's Ash Wednesday, seems fitting some stuff gets nuked. =p -- Cheese 15:36, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- Template:London - now used -- ▧ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 15:55, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- Okie dokes, I've struck that one. -- Cheese 15:57, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- Have seen it, but will give this some time for potential adopters. At least Template:Dulston Alliance Helper looks like something that might be planned to be used at a moment's notice, but just isn't currently. -- Spiderzed▋ 16:29, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- Deleted - The author of these unused templates removed them all from their user pages over a month ago. I think it can be assumed that they are unwanted. ~ 18:15, 11 March 2011
- Deleted - The author of these unused templates removed them all from their user pages over a month ago. I think it can be assumed that they are unwanted. ~
- Have seen it, but will give this some time for potential adopters. At least Template:Dulston Alliance Helper looks like something that might be planned to be used at a moment's notice, but just isn't currently. -- Spiderzed▋ 16:29, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- Okie dokes, I've struck that one. -- Cheese 15:57, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Defenders Of Life and Defenders of Live
Redirects to a page deleted a few days ago. Smyg 18:01, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
- Done as scheduled. Please remember to post new requests under the Speedy Deletion queue header. ~ 18:07, 11 March 2011
- Oh, right. I keep forgetting. Don't notice the thing. Smyg 18:09, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
Crit 7
Vapor thinks that it's not working do to bad mojo, so we'll delete the page, but NOT THE TALK PAGE, and put it back up again. Hopefully, that will cleanse it of it's juju. --VVV RPMBG 17:40, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- done. Talk page kept.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 17:42, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- No luck. Thanks, though. --VVV RPMBG 17:44, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- What are you trying to get it to do, because it's displaying propaganda for me.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 17:46, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- Random-ish redirect using a switch. It works in preview but not when saved. ~ 17:52, 9 March 2011
- Ah, I see. I'd been getting the propaganda, not the redirects.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 17:55, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- Random-ish redirect using a switch. It works in preview but not when saved. ~
- What are you trying to get it to do, because it's displaying propaganda for me.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 17:46, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- No luck. Thanks, though. --VVV RPMBG 17:44, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Category:Brazilian User
Crit 4. -- Cheese 15:48, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Defenders of Life
Found this in the SD category but there's been no request put on here. Crit 7 by the looks of it. -- Cheese 15:41, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
User:DangerReport/Schonlau Motel (Pitneybank)
C1. Unneeded and freshly created dupe of User:DangerReport/The Schonlau Motel, which plainly wasn't correctly embedded in the location page at that time. -- Spiderzed▋ 01:01, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
- Done, -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 02:20, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Annus_Horribilis/CH
orpaned & crit7 -- ▧ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 14:53, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- Done. ~ 16:07, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Annus_Horribilis/RH
orphaned & crit7 -- ▧ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 14:53, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- Done. ~ 16:07, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Test Page adsad
Obvious C1 is obvious. (And no, C1 isn't scheduled, so I have to wait for a 2nd op deleting it and/or a regular user demanding SD to deal with it if I want to be on the safe side.) -- Spiderzed▋ 11:22, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- Done. ~ 16:07, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Update
wat -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 11:30, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- KEEP - Jesus God, man, it's just been created. Also, check the Box's talk, the user wants to create an update system for RPs like the DangerReport system. If anything, this could go on A/MR, but it's so not a speedy deletion it hurts.
16:48, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- yerrrr dangerreports go on the article of the location much like the user's been using it, so good call! -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 17:54, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- I don't understand you here. Instead of moving this to the template namespace and letting the user develop it, you want it deleted outright without any cited criterion? Why? 18:47, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- Erm. I don't understand you here. User wants to make a danger-report like template. User creates said template and includes it on a page called Update. User doesn't touch Update again and continues to include the danger-report like template on actual location pages, which is the way it should be used. I assume Update was made for some sort of sandbox for the template he made. and the crit is crit 1, assumed it was so obvious by looking at the content I didn't care to specify. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 23:19, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- In case it wasn't clear, Mis, the template exists at Template:RPSM, and Update is just an inclusion of that template.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 23:22, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- See that's clear now. I had assumed Update actually was the template. As such, yes, this is crit 1. 23:33, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- See that's clear now. I had assumed Update actually was the template. As such, yes, this is crit 1.
- In case it wasn't clear, Mis, the template exists at Template:RPSM, and Update is just an inclusion of that template.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 23:22, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- Erm. I don't understand you here. User wants to make a danger-report like template. User creates said template and includes it on a page called Update. User doesn't touch Update again and continues to include the danger-report like template on actual location pages, which is the way it should be used. I assume Update was made for some sort of sandbox for the template he made. and the crit is crit 1, assumed it was so obvious by looking at the content I didn't care to specify. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 23:19, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- I don't understand you here. Instead of moving this to the template namespace and letting the user develop it, you want it deleted outright without any cited criterion? Why?
- yerrrr dangerreports go on the article of the location much like the user's been using it, so good call! -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 17:54, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
