Category talk:Historical Groups
Obtaining Historical Status
A policy is in place which outlines the method to attain historical status.
|
Nominations for Historical Status
When nominating a group, please add a note to Template:Wiki News and add {{HistoricalGroupVoting}} to the top of the group's page. Also, please add {{HistoricalVotingRules}} under the group's application for historical status.
New Nominations
Columbine Kids
Voting Rules |
Votes must be numbered, signed, and timestamped. They can take one of two forms:
Votes that do not conform to the above will be struck by a moderator. |
The only valid voting sections are Yes and No. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote. |
10 months have passed since the last nomination, which furthermore failed by just one vote. I see it thus as justified to re-approach them and see how well their reputation has kept up.
It has now been much more than a year that any Columbine Kids have been active, let alone orchestrated anything together.
From their very founding day on, they have polarized the UD metagame, going even as far as getting the group put up for deletion vote due to bad taste, or because no one thinks of the children, or whatever the reasoning was for those who voted for deletion. And it wasn't just at the beginning that they shocked and polarized the UD crowd, it even continued throughout their career.
They have not just made impact by their concept, though. They were also effective PKers, racking up massive bounties, performing highly coordinated timed strikes and getting involved in events like the 2008 Wedding Crash or Samhain Slaughter 1 to 3. You also mustn't forget their various school shooting tours they have organized and pulled off on their own.
They were recognized in the Malton Murder Awards 2010 as nominee for Best PKer Group.
Seriously, if you are involved in the PKer metagame at all, you have heard of them and their exploits. -- Spiderzed█ 15:16, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Yes
- See above. -- Spiderzed█ 15:16, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
- -- ▧ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 15:59, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
- --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 16:17, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
No
- As the previous bid's against votes. Too much of their value has been put into their apparent offensiveness, and otherwise they seem only successful, and neither of these points are enough to be entitled historical, or what should be called historical. -- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 17:39, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
- No, Same as last time wiki drama does not make you Historical. They were just your average PKers who only PKed nothing more. This does not make you Historical.--Josh Clark 18:21, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Recent Nominations
- Channel 4 News Team - Successful
Previous Discussions
There are 3 archives for this page.
General Discussion
Things Best Forgotten | |
This Category talk page has an archive. |
Voting Succeeded
Things Best Forgotten | |
This Category talk page has an archive. |
Voting Failed
Things Best Forgotten | |
This Category talk page has an archive. |
Historical Groups Use Discussion
just a question why and how did the roftwood assault force become historical?--User:Sexualharrison04:16, 23 June 2011 (bst)
- here's the vote. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 05:45, 23 June 2011 (BST)
- man did it squeak by. must have been when i was inactive for a few months.--User:Sexualharrison06:06, 23 June 2011 (bst)