User talk:The Hierophant

Re: We Need Updates!

I just read through that long post of yours about more zombies inside = less chances of cading. Yay @ Kevan listening to our plight, and even more yay @ you for bringing it up in the first place! <(^_^)> --Aeon17x 15:49, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. I too am just glad that Kevan responded so well and so quickly. Whether he read my idea or had it in the works all along, it's great to see that he takes our concerns as players of the game seriously. --Papa Moloch 03:50, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

A candy heart, for you!

	Valentines Day
	Fiffy has given Papa Moloch a candy heart for being a great Papa.

--Fiffy 04:13, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

ck forum

so are we kaput?----sexualharrison ¯\()/¯ 06:07, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

well.. open it. i sometime use it as a resource. and who knows maybe someone will try and join us... check the wiki. are you that bored with the game mate?----sexualharrison ¯\()/¯ 00:48, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

CUNT!----sexualharrison ¯\()/¯ 20:34, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

STICK!----sexualharrison ¯\()/¯ 04:07, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

NO U! --Papa Moloch 11:14, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

4H

You say No, but post in the ====Yes==== section. Pretty sure that that was a mistake on your part, but I'm not messing with votes before checking back first. -- Spiderzed▋ 13:58, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Whoops! Thanks for the alert. --Papa Moloch 11:14, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

CK for historical?

it would at least start up a nice shit storm--

bitch 14:35 21 March 2011 (UTC)

OMG you need to kick that mall rat guy in the dick.. you have a much better grasp of the English than i do. heh. -- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking

bitch 16:47 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for a good contest on CK's historical status bid, Moloch. I enjoyed it. I had a feeling it would go right down to the wire but when Feral Undead started chiming in I thought it was a sure thing that you'd win.--Mallrat ^{TSI TKS CTD} 06:15, 11 April 2011 (BST)

Yo Mallrat. I'm really happy for you. I'mma let you finish, but CK had one of the best PKer groups of all time. ;o)

Yes, three minutes in it. That's the very definition of 'narrow result'. Hell, it's a dimpled chad of a result. --Papa Moloch 14:30, 11 April 2011 (BST)

"Imma let you finish..." Really? Is it still 2009 where you are? Wow. Then you compare CK being flushed down the toilet of history to the 2000 US presidential election: I can only say it's reassuring to see you still take yourself far too seriously. :o) Next time, don't rely on the punctuality of feral zombies, and put your comedy sidekick SchlemielHarrison on a shorter leash or stronger meds: he's still bleating. Toodle-pip!--Mallrat ^{TSI TKS CTD} 06:40, 12 April 2011 (BST)

Snipes about timely humour from someone who has created a group based upon a hugely overrated show from the late '60s/early '70s, and the second most overused sketch too? I'd call that the most humourous thing on the wiki, were it not for the fact that it cannot possibly compare to the comical displays of stupidity that you vomit all over the place. As for taking myself too seriously, I have not complained about the result and the comparison was a clear one: Polls with extremely narrow outcomes, decided via stringent application of the rules. I would not be especially surprised if you find this difficult to grasp, as logic is something that you handle as an infant does a house brick, but I rather suspect that it's a deliberate attempt to misinterpret my comment because you didn't get the angry response that it now appears you were hoping for.

What's been made quite clear from your comment is that while I took your comment in good part and greeted it light-heartedly, you were in fact hoping to troll me and gloat over the result. Well, it's either that or you so enjoyed the degrading throat-rape that I subjected you to during the actual voting that you would really like a re-run. Either way, it's a rather silly way do behave and, characteristically in your case, lacks insight, intellect and dignity. That said, I'll be happy to kick you around some more if your masochistic instincts are burning so hot right now. --Papa Moloch 11:48, 12 April 2011 (BST)

I got an angry response from Harrison and a pompous essay from you, as expected. (Using a phrase like "throat rape" is beyond disgusting, but revealing.) Your reference to dimpled chads was clearly a little whine about the vote; do let me know if you'd like the rules to be ignored in future. Meanwhile, thanks for playing!--Mallrat ^{TSI TKS CTD} 16:41, 12 April 2011 (BST)

Harrison is his own man and responds as he feels. I am my own man and enjoy slapping cretins around wherever they appear. The fact that you've started to post on my talk page indicates that 'special' schools are starting up their own delivery service for just such purposes.

It's coming across very much in your repeated posts that you would like me to be devastated by the result, to protect against it and that in not fulfilling either part I deny you some kind of meagre pleasure in what passes for your life. So, having been thoroughly humiliated and belittled during the 'debate'/idiot-hammering side-portion of the poll, you come here trying to troll me so that you can then point to responses and shout out 'Look! He may have made me look a complete fool in the debate, but he's GUTTED that his group didn't make Historical and he wants the rules changed!!!' How sad it must have proven for you to then find me thoroughly unperturbed by the whole thing.

It would have been fun to see CK on the list of Historical Groups, but it was someone else's idea and not making it does not matter to me in any active sense. Indeed, my lasting memories of the poll will be that my little group inspired a great of the scene like Amber and that other excellent players like Misanthropy and Goribus either joined or planned to in the future. The reasoned intelligence of some of the voters, including Paddy and Karek from the opposing side, also stands out. Don't worry though: the shrieking hysteria of your protests will feature too (especially the part during which you started to randomly snipe at Cobra. Very entertaining).

As to the rules, they are what they are and I don't want them changed. If I did then I would be debating them on the poll page. It's the UD wiki, not a national assembly. Almost a nice attempt to turn a reference to a close polling result into a straw man though. Almost. --Papa Moloch 17:19, 12 April 2011 (BST)

343 words on the topic of How Little I Cared About CK Being Humped, and My Happy Memories Thereof: bait taken, hook, line and sinker. Your attempts to get a mass of Feral Undead votes at the last minute also show you cared a little more "actively" than you admit now. Regarding Cobra, TSI recently encountered them in-game and found them severely wanting too, so there was nothing random about that.

It's been a pleasure, as always. Allow me to leave you a parting gift. Stay pompous - Amen!

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mallrat (talk • contribs) at an unknown time.

You see, this is the thing: When one is intelligent, educated and articulate it's extremely easy to put together comprehensive arguments in a timely fashion. One also tends to value the making of a clear statement, as opposed to simply belching paraphrased and posturing stupidity across the internet in the manner which you yourself favour. You seem to believe that slapping you down requires some kind of effort. You are, as in so very many things, quite mistaken.

I did indeed go to the Feral Undead board late on to drum up a few votes, because they had shown an interest. Your belief that it could be a 'mass' indicates just how little you actually know about the game. Feral Undead's board is a general congregation point used by a relatively small proportion of their membership, most of whom only visit to see where the food is. The voters who came were about the limit of the likely demographic. You repeated witless assertion that I was on some kind of full-on campaign trail falls down rather when one considers a certain fact: I am a War Counsellor and former leader of the Ridleybank Resistance Front. If I was truly as determined to see Columbine Kids on the Historical Groups list as you quite desperately appear to want to believe I was, then a simple post on the RRF section of Barhah.com would have sufficed. There is no such post.

Your assertion of desperation on my part seems almost Freudian in a lot of ways. The rabid fervour with which you attacked and defamed the bid is indicative of a desperation even in excess of that and, having been roundly humiliated when you attempted to debate with me on it, you have now come here plainly trolling. However, it's all yet more throat rape for Mallrat. A pity for you. However, there is a silver lining for you, as my sadistic leanings have been sated and you no longer hold any appeal, so it is time to toss you aside like a used condom.

In your two most recent posts you have made it plain that you are indeed trolling in a quite juvenile and pathetic way. I had given you credit for being an adult, albeit a rather stupid and ineffectual one. However, in that I was mistaken. You've made a big show of how you are apparently done with all this, but then you did that during the vote too, pulling up your knickers and trying to maintain your composure, only to come back shrieking yet again. So, in order to spare myself some wasted time and yourself more humiliation, I must make it plain that you are no longer welcome on my talk page. You are not to post here and anything that you do attempt to post shall be deleted unread. --Papa Moloch 12:23, 13 April 2011 (BST)

And the prize for most eloquent burn of the year goes to Moloch!--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 13:33, 13 April 2011 (BST)

y'all talk so pretty. and can we add that as a category to the MMAs"? -- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking

bitch 14:02 13 April 2011 (UTC)

interested?

would you like to be a judge?--User:Sexualharrison01:59, 1 June 2011 (bst)

Sure, why not. I promise to vote with absolute impartiality, from a stance of wanting them all dead. ;o) --Papa Moloch 03:19, 1 June 2011 (BST)

please go to Grimmies/Voting and cast your votes on the talk page under your name. thanks--User:Sexualharrison14:14, 29 July 2011 (bst)

So I guess missed the vote a second time. (CK historical vote)

That sounds about right.  :) Day late & a dollar short. Thanks for fixing that. --Samhain Sam 18:41, 18 February 2012 (UTC)