UDWiki:Historical Group/Voting/The Ridleybank Resistance Front
The Ridleybank Resistance Front
There can be no question that the RRF has been a historical group. I would suggest that it has been the most historical group in the game. No suburb is synonymous with threat to human life in the way that Ridleybank is. The Blackmore Building has been the center of countless large sieges between the RRF and humans fascinated by the danger they cause. The RRF has, simultaneously, menaced whatever area of Malton drew their attention at any particular time. From their founding in 2005 by the mythical Petrosjko to this very day, they have been one of the largest, most powerful, most respected groups in the city. Really, this vote is not over whether the RRF is historical, but rather it is over whether it is appropriate, in this final week, to override the rule against making a group which is still very much active into a historical group. I believe that it is appropriate. --VVV RPMBG 02:19, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
Yes
- Yes - Author Vote. --VVV RPMBG 02:19, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes - Sadly, it'll be inactive in a few days regardless... Levixorz (talk) 02:25, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
- I think we can dispense with the inactivity requirement since, yes, all the groups will shortly be inactive anyway. -- AHLGTG THE END IS ACTUALLY NIGH!
- Of course. —Aichon— 06:32, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes. Bob Moncrief EBD•W! 12:37, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
- --Axe Hack Talk 13:52, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
- I don't even know where to begin. The whole history of UD is heavily intertwined with that of the RRF, and many many historical events like the Blackmore Sieges wouldn't have happened without them. -- Spiderzed▋ 14:09, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
- Without question. The eternal 'Big Bad' of Urban Dead. Insomniac by Choice said years ago (2008/9 time) that if the RRF didn't exist, it was possible that the game itself might have died entirely at that time. That's probably a little excessive, but by no means as much so as it might first appear. --LordMoloch (talk) 19:27, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes. —-NZ Idol (talk) 19:43, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes --CyanEyed C-Kids 19:49, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes --plscks (talk) 19:57, 8 March 2025 (UTC) (edited)
- Yes! - Barhah (talk) 20:16, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes! Utterly, impenetrably, bogglingly renowned beyond dispute. --
FoD PK Praise Rando!20:23, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes! Could there be any doubt? TommyVee (talk) 21:09, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes --Zoutroi (talk) 22:12, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes Shocked that RRF isn't already a historical group. Parham (talk) 22:26, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes! Tarkenton 22:30, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes! Obviously. Funk McBogey 22:39, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes. Really? Of course they deserve this! Roddy Winters (talk) 22:57, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
- 100% BARHAH Zanz 23:17, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
- The #1 zombie group consistently for ages, obviously yes. Wayson (talk) 23:46, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
- Barhah & Yes! Hate Crime 🎭 (talk) 00:14, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
- Without question. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wesker41 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 9 March 2025 (UTC).
- I'm surprised this even has to be voted on. RogueRisker (talk) 00:37, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
- This is an unquestionable yes! BigJD (talk) 02:27, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
- Simply a yes. Jacks LeRoy (talk) 03:50, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes! I've always heard of and feared the RRF. Joined them finally in 2024. Sux I didn't before. Haifinnesoup 13:35, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
- YES - Without the RRF, no UD. No other organisation has had such a defining role in this game as the RRF. They are the epitome of a historical group. PB&J 16:04, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes. ~ AphelionT 18:30, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes - this one should just jump the approval process! Major Powers (talk) 18:51, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes -- Dislycan (talk) 20:44, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
- YES - Love from Swing XOXOXTalk 21:11, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes --Dijon Sanders Talk 21:34, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
- Ridleyyes Yesistance Front Spud (your favourite DJ's favourite fuccboi) 21:39, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes Papa Petro (talk) 01:18, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes! A++ would be devoured again. ~ Saralan Talk 404 ZHU ❤ 01:34, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
- Absolutely --
Albert Schwan 9 March 2025
- yes ~ Red Hawk One Talk | Thanks for the memories 05:24, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by JaneZoe (talk • contribs) 06:38, 10 March 2025 (UTC).
- Yes Can't have been a part of the GC days when rotters where the only ones breathin' and not toss my vote in here Clayton Carmine (talk) 08:34, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes --Thvortex (talk) 19:53, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes - a 'No Brainer' Kevin Turvey 11 March 2025
- Yes. Even though Moloch reckons I have cooties :( stelar Talk|MCM|EBD|Scourge 09:24, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes Kylestyle4 (talk) 18:02, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- Absolutely. -- Cheese 19:00, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yep. --hagnat 19:54, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes. ♥ Moonie Talk Testimonials 21:33, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes Gazstar (talk) 00:13, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, obviously! Truly an honor to be part of this glorious horde Fiffy (talk) 05:11, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes! --SweetIrony (talk) 11:44, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yarp, just because I wanted my name on here Jack Telan (talk) 22:03, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
No
- VOTE TYPE = NO; REASON = SPITE —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DEADGAY (talk • contribs) 10:27, 12 March 2025.
- Spite. --【ⅎooɹd ǝʌɐɥ ᴉ sʇɐoƃ sʍoʅʚ ⅎǝᴉɹɔuoɯ uǝɹɐʞ】 ☉
☉
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 05:26, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- Who? --Ocular
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 02:27, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, but we must respect the rules-based wiki order. The RRF is still active, so I must vote no. --Starlingt (talk) 10:00, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
- VOTE TYPE = NO; REASON = SPITE Shigogouhou (talk) 11:12, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
Result
Given the workload, I am starting to knock out the obvious winners early. Congratulations RRF, you greatly deserve it. -- Spiderzed▋ 17:10, 12 March 2025 (UTC)