Suggestion:20090326 Putrification

20090326 Putrification

Honestmistake 10:35, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Suggestion type
Zombie skill

Suggestion scope
Zombies with the rot who really dislike revives. Pre req skill is "Flesh Rot"

Suggestion description
The body is now so far gone with rot that even in a powered NT it often takes more than a single syringe to revive, not only that but prolonged contact with this walking cadaver risks infection! However the advanced decomposition may be noticeable to those nearby

Because of the advanced state of purification that this body has reached it has become harder to successfully reinvigorate, even inside a powered NT revives will fail 50% of the time. Revive Attempts & Body Dumps have a 1% chance to spread infection (as if bitten) Due to the advanced state of decomposition the body of those rotters may give warning to those nearby, The areas description will include a note of how many zombies smell particularly rotten. IE: "there are two zombies here, one of them smells worse than normal"

• Many did not like the idea that scans and (particularly) attacks could also result in the infection which is exactly why they are no longer included.
• A lot of people did not like the idea of no warning. This is now included and there is always the potential for a later medical or NT skill to further identify those with advanced rot (as well as possibly negate the infection chances!)

Contributors: Thanks go to Zombie Lord for his enthusiasm in pushing this

Voting Section

Voting Rules

Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped. # justification ~~~~ Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

Keep Votes

1. Keep My vote obviously goes here. --Honestmistake 10:41, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
2. Keep - As a rotter I like the idea. What's wrong with putting a little trepidation into combat reviving in a NT building? :-) --Roorgh 16:56, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Kill Votes

1. Strong Kill - Better then the original (skill toggle = big no-no,) but I still don't really like my idea as it nerfs combat revives even more. They aren't perfect (you might revive a spy,) and if used stupidly, the costs can easily outweigh the benefits. That said, I have my biases (both groups combat revive liberally.) Linkthewindow  Talk  11:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

   well it does only Nerf combat revives against rotters and it should be remembered that they were never possible until the powered revive update nerfed the poor dedicated rotters ability to fight in NT's.--Honestmistake 11:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

2. Kill - I simply don't think this has a place in the game. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 11:49, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
3. Kill The primacy of the zombie bite for infecting people is zombie cannon. Also, seems unfair. Why should a zombie get to make a free attack just for dying in a building? --A Big F'ing Dog 16:09, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

   Its not cannon, many genres show the zombie virus spread by contact or even just breathing. In any event infection in this game is not the same as the cause of zombiehood, its just caused by poor hygiene. Also; its not a free attack for dying... its a (very small) risk survivors take if they want to remove the corpse... --Honestmistake 16:13, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

4. Kill - The revive nerf is unwarranted, especially considering it's 10AP for failure. Assuming RNG is perfect, that's 20AP to revive on average, +1AP for DNA extraction +1-3AP for a HP check (if deemed necessary). On top of that, it takes a certain building type, a skill, an item, a generator and a measure of coordination to complete a combat revive run. It takes one 100XP skill to become immune to any syringe, except in that instance I've showed you. Nope. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 16:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
5. Kill - If a brain rotted zombie doesn't want to be revived, it shouldn't enter powered NecroTech facilities. --LaosOman 19:25, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

   rotter revives were introduced to benefit rotters who may change their minds (or just want to pick up a few new cross over skills) I don't think the mechanic was ever really intended to give survivors a new and devastating weapon to defend the single most important buildings in the game.--Honestmistake 00:01, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

6. Kill - As above this only makes it harder for those that want to be revived, even if there are not many. Rogueboy 19:34, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
7. Kill - I like the idea of revives failing because of the utter deviousness, but I do not care for the auto-attack infection part. --ZsL 20:18, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
8. Kill - As LaosOman, except I'd say "if they didn't want to risk being revived", I do like the risk of infection for physically handling the corpse though. --Kamikazie-Bunny 20:28, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
9. Kill - As I said before, I like the idea of a zombie so rotten that it may require more than one needle to revive, but this should happen naturally; say, if it goes a certain period of time without being revived (or something like that). The infection part is never going to fly. --Paddy Dignam^{IS DEAD} 01:57, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
10. I dunno, it only costs 1 AP to avoid getting revived. And a "warning" is irrelevant when you don't get to avoid the ones that have this.--Pesatyel 04:18, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
11. Kill - As above. --Private Mark 07:06, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
12. Kill - Infection should not be possible without spending the AP to actually bite the target. No free infection for you! --Maverick ^{Talk - OBR 404} 18:01, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Spam/Dupe Votes

1. Spam - Automatic attacks, traps, and "free" actions like infecting someone with no AP cost is spam. --Giles Sednik ^CAPDSWA 22:05, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
2. Spam -As Giles. 3R 22:32, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
3. Spam - Thirding Giles here. Giving someone an infection without having to spend the AP to bite them? Come on. Brain Rot and Flesh Rot are enough; this skill would just make things ridiculously unbalanced. Fujiko Mine 01:45, 30 March 2009 (BST)

   a tiny chance of being infected when taking either of 2 actions (one of which is easily avoided) is hardly ridiculously unbalanced. The main purpose of this skill was always to lessen the abusive nature of unwanted rotter revives while attacking NT's. --Honestmistake 08:16, 30 March 2009 (BST)

   My big problem (though you have fixed the whole "warning" and "infection" parts of the skill, making it much more evened out) is that zombies don't need yet another way to make combat reviving difficult. While I'm not the type of player that encourages combat revives, I think that the Brain Rot functions well enough to prevent unwanted revives. If a zed wants to remain a zombie, then maybe it should stay away from NecroTech facilities; otherwise, it's fair game. As I said earlier, this is no longer as unbalanced as it was previously (I don't care how small the chance of infection was; it's still crappy), but I think that having revives available only in powered Necrotech Facilities is already enough to ensure zombie status. I can understand the frustration of a revive essentially being an "instant kill" to a zed, but NT's are arguably the most important buildings in Malton, so I think combat revives are fair game. Fujiko Mine 08:35, 7 April 2009 (BST)

Voting Rules

Current Suggestions Advice to Suggesters Adding options to your suggestion is not good practice. Others will not vote on the options, only the main body; please don't ask them to do so. Once you have posted your suggestion, it is considered complete. Altering the suggestion mechanics after voting has begun nullifies existing votes, and is considered an abuse of the suggestions system. Doing so will result in your suggestion being removed from the voting system to removed suggestions, where you can work out the details and resubmit later if you desire. It is preferred that you remove your own suggestion and resubmit a new version with changes, if changes are needed. "Notes" added for clarification purposes, and correcting spelling/typos are permitted. When considering adding a clarification note, it is often better for all parties involved, for the author to remove the suggestion and resubmit it with the clarification included for the voters who have already placed their votes. Advice to Voters You are voting on Suggestions, not Users. The text of your vote should not personally attack or denigrate the user who has submitted it... no matter how ridiculous the idea. Flaming and/or Trolling will not be tolerated. Before voting please read the Suggestions Dos and Do Nots and Frequently Suggested Ideas Page to read about concepts that have been generally considered unworkable in the past. You do not need to follow the guidelines on these pages but they are worth consideration before casting a vote. One vote per user. No exceptions. You cannot use multiple wiki accounts to vote on a suggestion. To Vote, use the [edit] button at the top of the voting section, then enter your vote in the the proper format to the end of the relevant section (keep/kill/spam). It is strongly recommended that voters (especially in the kill/spam sections) justify their vote to help others understand the reason they disagree. Feedback helps new suggesters get a feel for what the community does and does not want included in Urban Dead, and a deeper understanding of the balance needed for a workable suggestion. Votes must include a signature in order to be considered valid votes. To sign a vote, use --~~~~. Please remember to sign your votes! Unsigned votes will be deleted after 30 minutes or when found. Each Suggestion will be open to voting for two (2) weeks, measured from the suggestion's Timestamp, unless it is a Dupe or Spam. If, at the end of that time, there are two thirds (2/3) more Keep votes than Kill votes, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Reviewed Suggestions page. Otherwise, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Rejected Suggestions page.

Rules for Discussions Votes are NOT the place to discuss Suggestions. This page and archived suggestion pages only to be used for the Suggesting and subsequent Voting of these suggestions. If you wish to discuss the suggestion or vote here, please use this page's Talk page (Suggestion talk:20090326 Putrification). Suggestions do not have to be submitted in order to discuss them. Developing Suggestions can be used to workshop possible suggestions before they are submitted.

Valid Votes Keep, for Suggestions that you believe have merit. Kill, for Suggestions that you believe do not have merit. If you need to discuss a rule fix, use the discussion page. Spam, for the most ridiculous suggestions. Suggestions can be removed with Spam votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks. Spam votes are not a "strong kill", they are simply here to prevent the utterly ridiculous from clogging up the system. If you do not like the idea, and it's not some crazy uber power or something else ridiculous, VOTE KILL, NOT SPAM. Spam votes will be counted as Kill when votes are tallied. Dupe, for Suggestions that are exact or very close duplicates of previous suggestions. For a Dupe vote to be valid, a link must be provided to the original suggestion. Dupe votes can be used to remove suggestions as described on the cycling suggestions page. Dupe votes will not be counted when votes are tallied. Humourous, for suggestions that are obviously intended to be satirical, or of comedic value only.}} Suggestions can be removed with Humourous votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks.

Invalid Votes Server Load and Programming Complexity are NOT very good Kill reasons. You are voting on the merit of the suggestion and whether or not you think it belongs in the game. Server load/complexity issues are up to Kevan to decide. X should be implemented first is not a valid reason for a vote. You are voting on the merit of THIS suggestion, not how it compares to others. Votes that do not have reasoning behind them are invalid. You MUST justify your vote.

Comments Re may be used to comment on a vote. Only the original author and the person being REd can comment. Comments are restricted to a single comment per vote, and it is expected that Re comments be as short as possible. Reing every kill vote is considered abuse of the Re comment. A Re does not count as a vote, and any subsequent discussion not part of the Re comment should be held on the discussion page if there is any extended commenting. Note is used by System Operators to invalidate trolling-based votes. Only Sysops may remove troll-based votes and they do so with a strikeout <s></s> in order to preserve the trolling removal for posterity. The voter may contest the strikeout with the Sysop that struck their vote out on the discussion page. Only a System Operator may remove a strikeout.

All Caps Try to avoid YELLING, writing in bold, or using italics, except when emphasizing a point which has escaped other voters.

VOTING EXAMPLES Keep Votes Keep - I am the author and I am allowed to vote once on my own suggestions. --MrSuggester 05:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT) Keep - Best. Suggestion. Evar. --Bob_Zombie 04:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT) Keep - Good sugestion. no signature --FakeSuggester 07:39, 15 Nov 2005 (GMT) Kill Votes Kill - This is a terrible idea, but you can totally fix it up. --NegativeGal 06:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Re - Please be more specific about how to fix it on the discussion page. --MrSuggester 14:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Re - Sure, I have detailed my proposed fixes here. --NegativeGal 23:38, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Kill - You will eat my poopie and love it! --PooEater 11:12, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT) Note - Inane vote removed. Defend in discussion. --DaModerator 11:13, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT) Spam/Dupe Votes Spam - Kung Fu CB Mama on Wheels is an inappropriate Survivor Class. --NoFunAtAll 09:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Dupe - Duplicate Suggestion --AnotherSuggester 05:01, 14 Nov 2005 (GMT)