UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(383 intermediate revisions by 47 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Shortcut|[[A/A]]}}
{{Shortcut|[[A/A]]}}
{{Moderationnav}}
{{Administrationnav}}
{| align="right"
{| align="right"
|__TOC__
|__TOC__
Line 7: Line 7:


=Arbitration Cases Currently Under Consideration=
=Arbitration Cases Currently Under Consideration=
{{ArbitrationNotice}}
{{ArbitrationNotice}}
<!--
<!--


If there is no arbitration cases under consideration, please add the following text to this header
If there is no arbitration cases under consideration, please add the following text to this header
''There are currently no cases under consideration''
''There are currently no cases under consideration''
-->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -->
=Arbitration Cases in Progress=
=Arbitration Cases in Progress=
<!--
<!--
If there is no arbitration cases under consideration, please add the following text to this header
If there is no arbitration cases under consideration, please add the following text to this header
''There are currently no cases under consideration''
''There are currently no cases under consideration''
''There are currently no recently concluded cases, see the [[:Category:Arbitration Cases|archives]] for older cases''
<!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -->
 
''There are currently no cases under consideration''
==[[User:Spiderzed]] and [[Big Coffin Hunters]] vs [[User:tyx94]] and [[User:Yonnua Koponen]]==
This case is being brought over [[Template:Dulston Groups]]. Tyx94 [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Template%3ADulston_Groups&diff=1847417&oldid=1844785 has] [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Template:Dulston_Groups&diff=next&oldid=1847549 repeatedly] changed the position of the survivor group [[Big Coffin Hunters]] to Hostile Groups (or respectively Zombie Groups).
 
[[User_talk:Tyx94#You_are_not_a_member_of_BCH|Requests on Tyx94's talk page]] by two different users to stop those unqualified edits have been voiced, but have been met with announcements to continue the edit warring. As BCH see no other way left to resolve this matter, we've decided to take it to arbitration.
 
I, [[User:Spiderzed|Spiderzed]], have been appointed as representative of BCH.
 
As for arbitrators, we'd accept the following as fair and unbiased third-parties:
 
*[[User:Ashley Valentine]]
*[[User:DeWolf]]
*[[User:Franz Molotov]]
*[[User:Headless gunner]]
*[[User:Karloth vois]]
*[[User:Mr Watt]]
*[[User:Rapture]]
*[[User:Skoll]]
*[[User:The Colonel]]
*[[User:Zombiegeorge]]
 
--{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 16:13, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
:Bullshit, all biased. Add me to Tyx94's side of the argument. I've had enough of you guys fucking with the group listing too, and I haven't had a good raeg off yet this month.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 16:16, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
::I expected the other party to try to disrupt the process by refusing all arbitrators out of hand. So I prepared a second set of less unbiased, but still acceptable arbitrators along with reasons why they can be trusted:
::*[[User:AnimeSucks]] - Resens admin and former bounty hunter in the DA area
::*[[User:DT]] - PKA admin
::*[[User:Lois Millard]] - RG moderator
::*[[User:Maverick Farrant]] - leader of an ally group of Dulston Alliance
::*[[User:Misanthropy]] - wiki sysop
::*[[User:Sexualharrison]] - completely uninvolved, but still wiki-savvy
::*[[User:Sherry Stringfield]] - strictly pro-survivor
::As for adding yourself, I'd be fine. Would Tyx be it too? --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 16:22, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 
As I said on Tyx's page I'd rather see this go through policy. Basically you should determine through policy whether or not suburb group lists are confined to being NPOV (which I think they should) before determine whether groups are survivor/pk/zed through arbitration. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|12px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|12px]]</span> [[User_Talk:MisterGame|<span style= "color: black; background-color: white">'''''Talk''''']]</span> 16:24, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
:I agree with Thadeous. While we will need to arbitrate it, let's wait until after a policy is established. Yon, I'm going to need your wiki knowledge, so any help is appreciated. And I much prefer the second list of arbitrators.--[[User:Tyx94|tyx94]] 16:26, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
::Why don't you try suggesting people who are actually on the list of arbitrators? By which I mean that DT, Lois, Anime, Sexual, Sherry and Misanthropy are grossly inappropriate, and I wouldn't want anybody associated with either group arbitrating.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 17:50, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
:::Both Maverick and Misanthropy ''are'' on the list of arbitrators. The others might not be, but that has never been a hindrance. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 18:22, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
:I guess no policy on (N)POVness of suburb pages then? Well have fun with arbitration :) --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|12px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|12px]]</span> [[User_Talk:MisterGame|<span style= "color: black; background-color: white">'''''Talk''''']]</span> 17:54, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
::I'd be willing for one, but I can tell you now that it will just be meatpuppeted out.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 17:56, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 
Lol, establishing through policy. I offer my hat as an arbie. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 16:49, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
:I accept you, but I don't know who else will.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 17:50, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
::'''I accept Ross.''' However, we absolutely need to have Tyx on board, as he has been the offending party, and a ruling would be senseless without results affecting him. Either he sticks around for this, or lets Yon act in his absence and accepts the fall-out. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 18:22, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
:::Cool. Although you would need to clarify his position slightly. Is he representing soley tyx's interest or is he representing the [[DA]]? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 19:00, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
::::I think Tyx is actually representing [[The Burchell Arms Regulars|BAR]]. Although I don't know if he has a DA alt as well. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 19:07, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
:::::Tyx and I should both accept, and I'm not representing the DA, I'm representing the wiki as a game resource.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 19:36, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
::::::Well lets wait for that then. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 19:44, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
:::::::I would honestly rather try and make a policy first. Wouldn't it be smarter to establish a precendent to go off of? At any rate, I have no problem with Ross; I'm sure he'd be fine. And I'm acting on my own here, not representing any group at all. Just wanna see this get resolved one way or another.--[[User:Tyx94|tyx94]] 20:14, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
::::::::OK. Case postponed, whilst Tyx tries to create a workable policy. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:15, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 
Hasn't this been resolved before with groups like the [[Philosophe Knights]] and [[TZH]]? Standard practice has always been to let groups list where they feel appropriate, not for outsiders to change it at will. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 19:42, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
:I thought so too. Thus I expect this case to be very easy and quick. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 19:44, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
:Why even bother with categories then? It sounds like any group can list whatever category they want to be in, and so the groupings have no real, consistent meaning. We might as well just remove the categories and list everyone underneath "Groups."-[[MHS|<span style="color: Black">'''MHS'''</span>]][[User_Talk:MHSstaff|<span style="color: DarkBlue">'''staff'''</span>]] 20:00, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
::That's kind of my feeling here. Either we use the categories right, or why use them at all? If they aren't accurate information, we're better off throwing categories out altogether.--[[User:Tyx94|tyx94]] 20:14, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
:::If I could have a word.  I had a thought on this when I was debating on placing [[Organization XIII]] onto [[Lockettside]]'s Survivor group listing, but because we've been helping zeds more since the ratio have been favoring survivors since Org XIII began, I believed there would be edit warring on Org XIII's placing, despite the fact Org XIII is both Pro-Survivor and Hostile (depending on that one important population ratio), and as such, I've yet to add Org XIII to the group listing.  I tried to bring up [[Template talk:SuburbGroups#Dual Nature|adding Dual Nature]] onto the suburb group templates, although that discussion currently has gotten nowhere, as no one bothered to pay any mind to it. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 20:52, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
::::Was going to bring this up myself. --{{:User:Thanatologist/Sig}} 10:54, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Hmmm... nothing for over a week. Withdraw? --{{:User:Thanatologist/Sig}} 14:35, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
:The policy discussion has still two days left before being cycled, while the template talk page has no closing date. Still, this looks like one of the many arbies that fade away with a whimper. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 15:52, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
::I refuse to rescind this claim. Either it's solved through PD or the template talk, or I'm having your group forcibly moved to the correct section through arbies.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 16:07, 23 February 2011 (UTC)


=Recently Concluded cases=
=Recently Concluded cases=
 
<!--
Please see [[:Category:Arbitration Cases]] for older arbitration cases.
If there are no recently concluded cases, please add the following text to this header
''There are currently no recently concluded cases, see the [[:Category:Arbitration Cases|archives]] for older cases.''
-->
''There are currently no recently concluded cases, see the [[:Category:Arbitration Cases|archives]] for older cases.''


=Archives=
=Archives=
*[[:Category:Arbitration Cases|List of Arbitration Cases]]
*[[:Category:Arbitration Cases|List of Arbitration Cases]]

Latest revision as of 15:11, 7 January 2015

Administration Services

Sysop List (Check) | Guidelines | Policies (Discussion) | Promotions (Bureaucrat) | Re-Evaluations

Deletions (Scheduling) | Speedy Deletions | Undeletions | Vandal Banning (Bots) | Vandal Data (De-Escalations)

Protections (Scheduling) | Move Requests | Arbitration | Misconduct | Demotions | Discussion | Sysop Archives

While the wiki community attempts to work on the basis of encouragement and cooperation, there are occasions where wiki users find themselves unable to reach accord. In the event of this happening, the Arbitration Team may be called upon to intervene, and attempt to find a reasonable compromise that, while perhaps not satisfying both parties, may at least assist in defusing the situation, thanks to the unbiased third party.

Guidelines for Arbitration Requests

In assisting in Arbitration, we generally suggest that both parties agree to the Arbitration. This is not, by any means, a requirement, but we do require that both parties be represented in proceedings.

Any Arbitration request should provide at least the following:

  • The aggrieved parties. Either person vs person, or [list of people] vs [list of people].
  • The reason for the arbitration. This should very specifically be without reference to people, as that information has already been provided. It should be a short paragraph indicating the causes of the aggrievement, and why both parties feel it requires arbitration
  • Any pages affected by the aggrievement. This should be a simple list of links.

Once the Arbitration commences, the Arbitrator will request statements from all parties involved. Any evidence to back up one's statement should be provided in link form. Each party will then have an opportunity to rebut their opponent's statement. After these two steps, the Arbitrator will then consider the case, and reach a conclusion, and determine the outcome that is required. It's the duty of the Arbitrator to move a case he accepted to a subpage of UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration, and to update the status of the arbitration case in the Arbitration Cases in Progress section.

As a note, by requesting an Arbitration, all parties are thus obliged to accept the outcome of the Arbitration. Not doing will be considered Vandalism, and such vandalism attempts will be treated as if the vandal has already received two warnings.

After the Arbitration is over, it will then be moved to an archive page. As publicly accessible pages, they may be used to establish precedent in further, applicable cases.

Current Arbitrators

For guidelines on how to arbitrate, see Arbitration Guidelines.

The following users have placed their hand up as users who are willing to be contacted to act as an Arbitrator. The role of Arbitrator is not restricted to the Administration Team; any user can be contacted as an Arbitrator (even if not listed below) and use this page for the arbitration, so long as both parties agree to the Arbitrator. Users who wish to place their hand up as an Arbitrator should place their name below on the list, using *{{usr|YourUserPage}}

Also note that not all listed Arbitrators are active on the Wiki.

Volunteer Arbitrators in Alphabetical Order

Arbitration Cases Currently Under Consideration

Administration Notice
Use this header to create new arbitration cases. Once all sides have chosen an arbiter, move the case to a sub-page of UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration and update its status in the Arbitration Cases in Progress section.


Arbitration Cases in Progress

There are currently no cases under consideration

Recently Concluded cases

There are currently no recently concluded cases, see the archives for older cases.

Archives