|
|
| (980 intermediate revisions by 69 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Shortcut|[[A/A]]}} | | {{Shortcut|[[A/A]]}} |
| {{Moderationnav}} | | {{Administrationnav}} |
| {| align="right" | | {| align="right" |
| |__TOC__ | | |__TOC__ |
| Line 7: |
Line 7: |
|
| |
|
| =Arbitration Cases Currently Under Consideration= | | =Arbitration Cases Currently Under Consideration= |
|
| |
| {{ArbitrationNotice}} | | {{ArbitrationNotice}} |
| <!-- | | <!-- |
|
| |
|
| If there is no arbitration cases under consideration, please add the following text to this header | | If there is no arbitration cases under consideration, please add the following text to this header |
| | |
| ''There are currently no cases under consideration'' | | ''There are currently no cases under consideration'' |
| | --> |
| <!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE --> | | <!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE --> |
|
| |
|
| |
| ===[[User:Haliman111]] versus [[User:Lithedarkangel]]===
| |
|
| |
| The [[Umbrella Biohazard Containment Service]] page is in dispute. Lithedarkangel has been secretly pming members of the group to go to a new forum named The Drifters, and commence a coup. I have banned him from the UBCS forum and taken command of the UBCS. I want him, and all members of his renegade group barred from editing the page.
| |
|
| |
| As you can see [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Umbrella_Biohazard_Containment_Service&dir=prev&action=history here], I am the original author of the page.
| |
|
| |
| [http://s10.zetaboards.com/Umbrella_UBCS/profile/162677/ Here] or [http://s10.zetaboards.com/Umbrella_UBCS/topic/618693/1/ here] you can see I am still in charge of the original forum.
| |
|
| |
| [http://img641.imageshack.us/img641/2480/scr8394718.jpg He] admits here that the group has underwent a name change. If so, he can make a new page.
| |
|
| |
| Our [http://s7.zetaboards.com/The_Drifters/topic/8268619/1/ allies] support us in this ordeal.
| |
|
| |
| As an additional note, Li and I have agreed to represent our respective parties, with no interference from anyone else. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 02:58, 6 April 2010 (BST)
| |
| :I accept Drawde, DDR, Misanthropy, or Rosslessness. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 03:02, 6 April 2010 (BST)
| |
| I offer to arbitrate this case.--{{User:Drawde/Sig}} 03:01, 6 April 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| I'll offer to arbitrate this case should there not be agreement on your original choices. Though I would remind you that you cannot bind someone to an arbitration that they do not represent themselves in or do not give their explicit permission to be represented by someone else in. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 03:09, 6 April 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| I see some lies in here. Alright I accept DDR, Misanthropy or Rosslessness. And I'm representing myself.--{{User:Lithedarkangel/signature}} 03:57, 6 April 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| As ex leader of this group I volunteer to arbitrate and would rule neither of them wiki edits for the next 6 months as per the Umbrella Drama rule. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 05:41, 6 April 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| This has the potential to be a very difficult case to arbitrate, since the conflict looks so deeply internal that Arbitration probably won't be able to solve the problem at all, but has such enormous potential to shape the result. As such, I don't think anyone you've specified (myself included) is actually qualified to arbitrate this case; in the ideal world it would be something achieved within the group. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do this one, I'll have to hastily give it some thought. Given you don't have the time for that, both others are definitely good choices. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 07:02, 6 April 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| I'm sorry, this will seem childish at best, but after '''everything''' we've been through I just can't control myself; HHHHAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHHHAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHHHAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHHHAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHHHAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
| |
|
| |
| HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHHHAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHHHAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHa
| |
|
| |
| The irony, please forgive me, but the irony is just, mind-blowing. This isn't a late April's fool or something? --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 13:13, 6 April 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| Also, while the chances that Haliman accepts me as arbitrator are about the same caliber as winning the lottery, ten times in a row, I offer to arbitrator. Like Colonel Krauser, I probably have more knowledge then the people Hal listed. Also DDR is right, this is a pretty deep internal conflict, though I guess ownership over the page is an issue. And honestly, explain me something; Last time I checked, Li(thedarkangel) was the leader of the group. He was in charge, and you Hal, stepped down. I don't know how you're organized internally but if Li was the leader, and you overthrew him, then you're the one who initiated a coup, not the other way around. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 13:13, 6 April 2010 (BST)
| |
| :You never pass on an opportunity to make an ass of yourself, do you? --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 22:37, 6 April 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::Funny hearing that from you. If anything, the above case once again proves how you stop at nothing to preserve your self-interest above everything else. Especially considering Li, was like you're best fhrend on UD. I seriously feel for Li though, together with Megameh he at least had decency and honesty from what I saw in the past. You're a sad bastard D: Hate-mongering aside, I'll keep an eye out for this case, seems interesting enough. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 23:42, 6 April 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| I am a bit sad to have to see this. Thadeous is right. I am the leader of the UBCS and most of our members can support me, Haliman has been missing some information. First He left the group and created the brotherhood of Nod. We at the UBCS have been since expanding into new games, a new perspective. We as a group made the decision it was best for ourselves to change the name of THE FORUM and have specific names for the games, i.e in UD we are the UBCS in other games we have other name. A public poll was made so all our members could vote and decide. The name with more votes was "The Drifters". We asked Haliman (the founder account) to change the url he said it was not possible, a lie or simply ignorance?, I don't know. But he was stopping what we decided as a group and then I as the leader of the UBCS decided to ask Haliman for his account (since he left) so I could change the name and all that. He refused to do it. So we at HC thought of a new plan: Move everyone to a new forum. We moved the important topics. Post by post. And just to be accurate I didn't secretly PM our members, I personally PMed every last active member, I sent messages in chat and lastly I sent a big massive email to everyone. And that is when Haliman appears and throws a coup at me. Banning me and the UBCS members. Sorry for long text.--{{User:Lithedarkangel/signature}} 23:54, 6 April 2010 (BST)
| |
| :I think understand what you're saying. Hmm, I think I'm gonna help you with this by making a summary.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 00:30, 7 April 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| What Li means is this: The UBCS started playing different games besides UD under different names. In urbandead, they went by the name of UBCS, in another game by a different name etcetera. So Li decides to have all these different names bind under a single entity, called the Drifters. They would keep the different names to each individual game. So, in UD the Drifters would be remain to be known as UBCS, while another game they would be known as "X" etcetera. The Drifters would simply be a term to describe the collective of all individual game groups as a whole.
| |
|
| |
| The forum name would be changed to the Drifters, since all the different games were organized on the same forum. This was all decided in a public poll over at their forum. However, for some reason, Haliman (meanwhile more or less absent) as forum creator and therefore root admin, refused to change the forum name because he somehow "couldn't". So the group decided to move to a new forum all together. Then Hal decides he disagrees, and bans Li and a couple from the original forum and initiates a coup. That about right?--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 00:30, 7 April 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::GTFO. No one wants your here. And I hate to be edit conflicted.--{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 00:33, 7 April 2010 (BST)
| |
| :You also forgot to mention two things.
| |
|
| |
| :One being that you asked me, not to change the name, but for my password to my account. You went so far as to leave the following comment in the Admin CP. "I asked. I asked again. I asked one more time. This is what happened. ~Li"
| |
|
| |
| :Not once did you ask me directly to change the name. I told you what I thought. I was looking at domain manager, which says you can't change a URL.
| |
|
| |
| :Most roleplaying members are with you, yes. Most members of the clan itself, not to mention all of our allies support me in the ordeal. You were at one point leader. Your shady movements ((emailing members to get everyone on a new forum)) without alerting all of HC ((Myself and Posydon)) are treacherous. I have banned you from the main forum because of your blatant breach of the charter. Any major change requires a vote. You won the name change vote, which I would have gladly followed (if you told me!), but it did not merit a new forum.
| |
|
| |
| :[http://s10.zetaboards.com/Umbrella_UBCS/topic/618811/1/ The Charter] you signed states in Article IV, Section 4.03 all major changes require votes.
| |
|
| |
| :I'm surprised you left out the whole asking for my password part. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 00:33, 7 April 2010 (BST)
| |
| ===[[User:Iscariot]] versus [[User:Cornholioo]]===
| |
| The Battle of Krinks is over. And like the Imperium before them, the NSU insist on trying to alter the result to paint themselves in a better light, diminish the impact others had and for very straightforward propaganda purposes.
| |
|
| |
| As per the example of [[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Saromu and Vandr vs Ioncannon11 and Kikashie|this case]] I seek to have the result and subsequent alterations to the article judged and assessed by a neutral third party.
| |
|
| |
| I shall accept any of the following as arbitrator:
| |
| *[[User:Rosslessness]]
| |
| *[[User:Aichon]]
| |
| *[[User:Rosslessness]]
| |
| *[[User:Revenant]]
| |
| *[[User:Rosslessness]]
| |
| *[[User:Amber Waves of Pain]]
| |
| *[[User:Rosslessness]]
| |
| *[[User:Misanthropy]]
| |
| *[[User:Rosslessness]]
| |
|
| |
| Hugs and kisses. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 17:46, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| Whilst a member of the Knights, my [[User:Misanthropy/Characters/Grapple X|Knight]] character did not participate in this outing, as I was already in the area with a neutral [[User:Misanthropy/Characters/Misanthropy|alt]], from uninvolved group [[Burning chiton]]. As such, I am not stepping down as a potential arbitrator, and can point Cornholioo towards incidents of past acrimony between Iscariot and myself as proof of my impartiality. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 17:54, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :'past acrimony', I assume you me calling you on your attempts to meat puppet to gain a limited category as a propaganda bonus for your other group? -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 17:57, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| I'd like to offer to be the neutral third part that will judge and assess the edits to the article. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 18:09, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :You attempted to ally with the Order to wipe out the other two factions, your ability to be impartial could be questioned, so I don't think you could arbitrate this case. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 18:20, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| I volunteer to arbitrate, if only to get shot down by Iscariot.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 18:34, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :: Accepted. --[[User:Cornholioo|Cornholioo]] 19:07, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :::You can take this as my shoot down ;) -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 14:52, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| ::I'm just going to write down what is not correct about the page as it is right now. 1. the Coalition and the NSU have agreed the Battle of Krinks has ended on 21 March 2010. The PK do not recognize this, but keep editing the page to 22 March 2010. I would like to see this edited to 21 March 2010. 2. The NSU did not withdrew from the fight, but left after the fight was over to avoid a second one. I would like to see this edited. 3. Martino has posted this: "I revived Burning the Fire and killed a PKer inside the power station, but things do not look good. --Martino 22:31, 21 March 2010 (UTC)" on the talk page of the Battle of Krinks (http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Talk:Battle_of_Krinks). The PK keep denying to have lost a man. I would like to see the death count of the PK edited to 'dubious' untill further notice. 4. I have corrected this mistake: http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Battle_of_Krinks&diff=1679649&oldid=1679646 of Iscariot, which the Iscariot keeps editing back. This has nothing to do with the thing he reported me for, so I would like to see this edited. 5. The PK claim to have made an NPOV article. However, this: "On March 22 the Philosophe Knights declared complete victory and completion of their aims after the previous day's withdrawal of the NSU, the complete removal of non-Knights from Krinks and the pinata-ing of the entire building. Less than a week after entering the conflict, the Knights considered that they had made their lesson abundantly clear and that there was nothing further to accomplish.
| |
|
| |
| ::With the NSU abandoning the area and the Philosophe Knights indicating that they would leave the area after having taught their lesson to both participants meant that Krinks would be left in the hands of the WWSIS and that the Battle of Krinks would come to a close.", is not NPOV. 6. The NSU doesn't agree on the results of this battle. The PK claim victory, but this is only subjective. The NSU can claim victory for several reasons as well. I would prefer to place only facts here. The only this that have changed, are: a. Krinks got partially ruined. b. The coalition got driven off krinks (most likely temporary). c. The PK have entered krinks (most likely temporary). 7. This is not completely right: "demanding a mutual cessation of conflict and offering future cooperation in protecting Malton's Power Stations." We have demanded a mutual cessation of conflict and offered to add to our wiki page that other survivor groups help us in achieving our goals. Also see this page: http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Talk:National_Socialist_Union.
| |
|
| |
| ::A lot of this is POV or simply wrong. Still Iscariot keeps editing them back. The page has been locked now, so truth can't be spoken. --[[User:Cornholioo|Cornholioo]] 18:42, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :::''Truth''? From a Nazi? Who treated a mainspace page like his own personal page? Yeah, right. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 14:52, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| ::::Exactly. "You're a nazi so you can't say the truth", useless argument. In other words: "everything you say is wrong". That makes no sense. And like I've already explained, I didnt threat the article as my personal page. I've reproduced facts and facts only in the article. What you are doing right now is writing a POV article, you are the treating the article as your personal page. You've even refused to accept a neutral person to rewrite the article. Still you dare to call it NPOV and you even dare to insult me of treating 'a mainspace page like' my 'own personal page'. Now you're inviting a bunch of your PK friends to arbitrate this case. '''SHAME ON YOU'''. Though, I have already reacted on this, but you just keep repeating the same argument untill I get tired of it. When I then don't react on it anymore, you have won the debate. '''The Jew keeps repeating the same argument all the time. When the Aryan gets tired of it the Jew says his question hasn't been answered.''' If the Philosophe Knights are really so intelligent as they say, then start acting like it. --[[User:Cornholioo|Cornholioo]] 8:51, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :::::I'm not sure if I'm allowed to contribute to this discussion or not, but.. Well, I must say - The comment above (Specifically, the hate speech-sounding one) is low, very low. It has no meaning in this debate, is an direct insult to involved parties, would probably be illegal if uttered where I live and is largely fictional. Sorry for the intrusion. I apologize if I have broken a rule or two. [[User:Infrastructure|Infrastructure]] 14:18, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| ::::::I'm just explaining a problem. --[[User:Cornholioo|Cornholioo]] 9:17, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| As much as I'm flattered that Iscariot would name me as an arbitrator, I'm afraid I have a potential conflict of interest since I was an involved party (I participated in killing those inside Krinks with my Knight alt). While I do believe I could remain objective and impartial in a ruling on this subject, this matter can be easily resolved by other arbitrators, so I see no reason why I shouldn't recuse myself and save myself the hassle of dealing with accusations of partiality should the ruling not go the way people want. So, yeah, I'm recusing myself. Cheers. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 18:53, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| I don't know jack about '''any''' of this, so I'd make a perfectly impartial party! I've no ties against or for either party that would influence me unfairly in arbitrating this case.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 00:45, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| LOL-Bias. Accept Yonnua. Lets see how he's developing as a member of the community. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 10:54, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :No, you do it :P -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 14:52, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| :Chucking my hat in the ring. I watch the PK talk page and read the battle of the krinks page once, but that's my entire involvement. --[[User:Karloth_vois|Karloth Vois]] <sup>[[¯\(°_o)/¯]]</sup> 13:13, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| ::You have a concrete history of vandalising Philosophe Knight pages, can you guess what my response is going to be? -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 14:52, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| ::: Heh. I'd forgotten about that! Oh dear. If it's any consolation, I've got a concrete history of vandalising the [[Red Rum]] page, despite being the group leader at the time. --[[User:Karloth_vois|Karloth Vois]] <sup>[[¯\(°_o)/¯]]</sup> 23:19, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| I offer to arbitrate. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 16:27, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :I accept. --[[User:Cornholioo]] 14:53, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| If its not too late I'd like to be the Arbitatortot. I have a lot of experience with Arby's as I've been here many times. Their $5.01 deal is quite good and their Roast Spambeef sandwiches are delicious with Arby's Sauce. If you pick me I promise I will go extra hard on the person that I choose to lose. So if you want your opponent to get a weak slap on the wrist then pick one of the faggots above. They'll be too busy sucking major cock to properly lay the smack down. I, on the other hand, will go over the evidence and from that alone decide who lives and who dies. The decision will be fair, the punishment will not. So if you want top vanquish your enemy then choose me. Also, if you do not choose me you are admitting that you are also a faggot and give me permission to say so on my userpage. --[[User:Saromu|Sonny Corleone]] <sup>[[DORIS]] [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pXfHLUlZf4 I jizzed in my pants] [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91a8pHj7V9k pr0n]</sup> 00:34, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :I do not accept. --[[User:Cornholioo|Cornholioo]] 14:53, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| ::Aight, you're a faggot and I'm saying so on my userpage. --[[User:Saromu|Sonny Corleone]] <sup>[[DORIS]] [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pXfHLUlZf4 I jizzed in my pants] [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91a8pHj7V9k pr0n]</sup> 00:12, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| I'm going to reiterate the arbitrators that I will accept in hopes my opponent will actually get this case going rather than whine all over the wiki about it rather than doing something to get the page finished. I will accept:
| |
| *[[User:Rosslessness|Ross]]
| |
| *[[User:Revenant|Revenant]]
| |
| *[[User:Rosslessness|Less]]
| |
| *[[User:Misanthropy|Misanthropy]]
| |
| *[[User:Rosslessness|Ness]]
| |
| *[[User:Amber Waves of Pain|Amber Waves of Pain]]
| |
| *[[User:Rosslessness|Rosslessness]]
| |
| -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:46, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :please? --[[User:Saromu|Sonny Corleone]] <sup>[[DORIS]] [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pXfHLUlZf4 I jizzed in my pants] [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91a8pHj7V9k pr0n]</sup> 07:10, 28 March 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::He's already said no. You can't have a 'trator that isn't approved by both parties. Sowwy. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 10:48, 28 March 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::*[[User:Rosslessness|Ross]] Denied
| |
| :::*[[User:Revenant|Revenant]] Denied
| |
| :::*[[User:Rosslessness|Less]] Denied
| |
| :::*[[User:Misanthropy|Misanthropy]] Denied
| |
| :::*[[User:Rosslessness|Ness]] Denied
| |
| :::*[[User:Amber Waves of Pain|Amber Waves of Pain]] Denied
| |
| :::*[[User:Rosslessness|Rosslessness]] Denied
| |
|
| |
| :::Already explained why. White regards, --[[User:Cornholioo|Cornholioo]] 15:10, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| ::::You haven't explained in the slightest, but I have no desire to give you another tangent to go off on to delay this case further. Pick a list of arbitrators you would prefer then. Given you keep saying that page is false it is in your interest to get this case resolved as quickly as possible so the information on it can be changed. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 18:13, 29 March 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::::I'll stick to accepting/denying ones that apply. --[[User:Cornholioo|Cornholioo]] 10:27, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| So far that's [[User:Krazy Monkey]], anyone else you've accepted I missed? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 11:29, 30 March 2010 (BST)
| |
| :Cheese has had a recent history of severe and random absence from wiki activity. In order to get this case resolved quickly I'm unwilling to take the chance and will decline Cheese. My opponent is still complaining about the page being wrong in his opinion but makes not attempt to call new arbitrators to speed up this case I see. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 18:29, 30 March 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::I've already explained, but seen as your intelligence requires it I tell you one more time: they are your PKer friends. There are also some which I've had arguments with before, so I don't accept them. I've also accepted Yonnua, but you've denied him too. DanceDanceRevolution maybe? --[[User:Cornholioo|Cornholioo]] 7:39, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| ::::Rosslessness is a PKer? News to me. And Misanthropy is many things, but my friend he is not. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 10:39, 31 March 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::::'''I will try this one very last time: READ CAREFULLY:''' ''"There are also some which I've had arguments with before"''. --[[User:Cornholioo|Cornholioo]] 20:12, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :::::I have killed 10 survivors across 3 cities in 3 years. Here's [[Malton_Manhunt/Axe_Hack's_Manhunt_2#The_Results|9]] of them. Frankly I feel its massively AP inefficient. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 17:37, 1 April 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::::Speaking of which, let's get one of those beasts up and running again. I need my throne back!!! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 17:39, 1 April 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::::::Im running a story competition, trying to create an entirely fictional city, flagging up coding errors with the New RG and reorganising the glossary. And you're being less active. Too much effort this week. Plus I may abandon UD altogether if there's no '''FUCKING APRIL FOOLS UPDATE'''. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 17:42, 1 April 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::Although doing the case would be interesting, Iscariot wouldn't accept me, not that I blame him with the track record he and I have had together. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 08:44, 31 March 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::DDR is right, unfortunately there is a lot of bad blood between us and I don't think either of us would choose the other for a case. How about Suicidal Angel? -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 10:39, 31 March 2010 (BST)
| |
| :For the record I am about, my absence is only down to a combination of Uni work and work work. However I'm on holiday for the next 3 weeks from Uni so I have a stupidly large amount of free time. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 18:36, 1 April 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::Will you accept now Iscariot? --[[User:Cornholioo|Cornholioo]] 20:13, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
| |
| May I arbi for you two?--[[User:Dragon fang|Dragon fang]] 08:37, 1 April 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| =Arbitration Cases in Progress= | | =Arbitration Cases in Progress= |
| <!-- | | <!-- |
|
| |
| If there is no arbitration cases under consideration, please add the following text to this header | | If there is no arbitration cases under consideration, please add the following text to this header |
| ''There are currently no cases under consideration'' | | ''There are currently no cases under consideration'' |
| ''There are currently no recently concluded cases, see the [[:Category:Arbitration Cases|archives]] for older cases''
| |
| <!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE --> | | <!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE --> |
| ''There are currently no recently concluded cases, see the [[:Category:Arbitration Cases|archives]] for older cases'' | | ''There are currently no cases under consideration'' |
| | |
|
| |
|
| =Recently Concluded cases= | | =Recently Concluded cases= |
| ===[[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Cornholioo vs Saromu|Cornholioo vs Saromu]]===
| | <!-- |
| {{ArbitrationStatus|users=[[User:Cornholioo|Cornholioo]] Vs. [[User:Saromu|Saromu]]|arbitrator=none|created_at=12:34, March 26 2010 (UTC) |created_by=[[User:Cornholioo|Cornholio]]|status=Archived|summary=Dispute over claims made about Cornholioo on Saromu's talk page.}}
| | If there are no recently concluded cases, please add the following text to this header |
| | ''There are currently no recently concluded cases, see the [[:Category:Arbitration Cases|archives]] for older cases.'' |
| | --> |
| | ''There are currently no recently concluded cases, see the [[:Category:Arbitration Cases|archives]] for older cases.'' |
|
| |
|
| =Archives= | | =Archives= |
|
| |
|
| |
| *[[:Category:Arbitration Cases|List of Arbitration Cases]] | | *[[:Category:Arbitration Cases|List of Arbitration Cases]] |
