|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Shortcut|[[A/PM]]}} | | {{Shortcut|[[A/PM]]}} |
| {{Moderationnav}} | | {{Administrationnav}} |
| {{Promotions Intro}} | | {{:A/PM/Intro}} |
| ==Candidates still requiring vouches==
| |
| <!-- ''Place all new promotion bids under this header'' -->
| |
| ===[[User:Lithedarkangel]]===
| |
|
| |
|
| Li was always a wiki lover. He is a good guy, has been around for almost a year, and has never been warned. He plays a prominent role in current [[Location Nuts|Wiki]] [[The Status Reporters|Projects]].He is a total achiever, and if he was given System Operator abilities, he could really make use of his talents. He tries his best to avoid all wiki drama as well. If you don't know who he is, please abstain, and don't vote against him. That just wouldn't be fair.
| | ==Candidates Being Discussed== |
| | <!--- |
|
| |
|
| http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Special:Contributions/Lithedarkangel
| | ''There are no candidates at this time.'' |
|
| |
|
| If anyone has any questions, I'm sure Li will be able to answer them as soon as he sees this (he stalks the recent changes page.) --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 00:34, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| | !---> |
| | ''There are no candidates at this time.'' |
|
| |
|
| | ==Recent Bids== |
|
| |
|
| '''Response:''' I'm honored for the proposal, thanks hal. I accept this nomination. Now with the responses...
| | ===[[User:Hagnat]]=== |
| | *[[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Hagnat/2019-08-14 Promotion|Archived as Unsuccessful]]. |
|
| |
|
| ''Popularity:''I agree I'm not that popular on the wiki... maybe because I'm not part of vandalism.
| | ===[[User:DanceDanceRevolution]]=== |
| | *[[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/DanceDanceRevolution/2018-07-30 Promotion|Archived as Successful]]. |
|
| |
|
| ''Drama?:'' About that bit... It's mostly because I do other stuff. Of course that being a Sysop will require with me dealing with that kind of situations and I have no problem with that. Furthermore, I have a great patience when dealing with drama.
| | ==Archived Bids== |
| | | ''For earlier promotion bids, see the following:'' |
| ''Vandalizing:'' Me?... Nice one... I would never do such a thing... really... if I do.. ban me.
| | *[[:Category:{{CURRENTYEAR}}_Promotion_Archives|This year's promotion bids]] |
| | | *[[:Category:{{LASTYEAR}}_Promotion_Archives|Last year's promotion bids]] |
| ''Sysop?:'' Well, it will help with all the administration I have to wait for. I can help with that work too.
| | *[[A/SA|Sysop Archives]] for older bids and related sysop activities |
| | |
| ''Conflict of interest:'' Concerning the conflict with my group. I must say I would never attempt to do anything not approved by the rules.
| |
| | |
| I hope this is enough...If not keep asking.--{{User:Lithedarkangel/signature}} 02:56, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| -----
| |
| | |
| *'''Vouch''' - Obviously :) --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 00:38, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Against''' - "''If you don't know who he is, please abstain, and don't vote against him.''" I'll do whatever the hell I like, buddy. Sysop candidates should be well-known figures as the public spotlight will always be on them once they're promoted and going from obscurity straight into that kind of environment isn't a good thing. Besides, there's nothing he's doing that requires sysop abilities and functions that ''do'' require said abilities aren't difficult in any sense of the word. --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 00:43, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Vouch, because agreeing with a troll is badd. (Seriously though, this is an Against, and anyone that perceives it otherwise is stupid)''' - Needs moar experience and renown. I should be able to come back from a multi-month long break and know who you are within a few weeks.--[[User:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>]] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 00:50, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Abstain''' - Firstly, you should contact him first and get him to come here and say he wants to be a sysop, otherwise you won't get much support. Secondly, I think Lithe's work in the last few weeks has been awesome, and being a sysop could allow him to skip pointless bureaucracy and do what he needs to do. The only real problem i have is this thing about avoiding drama, i don't see that as a good trait, a/vb and a/m are natural drama machines and i don't think we need more sysops who are happy to not get involved in those areas. If he comes over and makes a statement i might be inclined to change my view, not that you really want my support anyway, coz we all know what that'll do to boxy's opinion of you.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:57, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *:lol bias. :D --[[User:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>]] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 00:58, 5 January 2009 (UTC) | |
| *:My, someone's feeling a little sore. --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 01:17, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Abstain''' - I like Li, I think he's a great guy, but he's just not prominent enough, and he doesn't need op privileges to do what he's doing now. I'm abstaining until I see evidence that sways me one way or another. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 01:05, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Provisional Abstain''' - The user needs to indicate a desire to be a sysop, they havn't on this page and cannot be promoted until they do. Also I'd be wary of the conflict of interest given their group's recent and on going wiki drama. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 01:07, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *:'''Re:''' - To be fair, the UBCS has <u>never</u> vandalized an Umbrella page. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 01:09, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *:::You'll notice I say conflict of interest and not potential vandalism concerns. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 01:16, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''who?''' - i guess cyberbob already said it, potential sysops should be users known by the public. I never heard of this guy (or girl), and by the looks of the others ''votes'' in here, i am not alone in that. --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:57, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *:onoze ur agreein wit a troll!11111 --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 02:11, 5 January 2009 (UTC) | |
| *::Potential sysops might want to be known by the other sysops, too. I don't recognize this name at all.--{{User:Nubis/sig}} 02:46, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Abstain''' - As Pestolence. He's a great guy, but doesn't need sysop powers just yet. Iscariot has a point over COI. I'm not saying that you would, but I wouldn't want you voting on A/VB with such a conflict. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 02:48, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *:'''Re:''' - Then... If you think my judgment could be affected I would not take part of that actions until this conflict is over.--{{User:Lithedarkangel/signature}} 06:07, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *::Really, it was only a small part in abstaining. If you left it another six months, kept up with your current level of activity, and participated in policy discussions more, then I wouldn't have a problem in vouching. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 07:16, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Against''' Needs time and visibility. [[User:Conndraka|Conndraka]]<sup>[[Moderation|mod]] [[User_talk:Conndraka|T]][[AZM]] [[Coalition for Fair Tactics|''CFT'']]</sup> 04:16, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Against''' - Needs moar drama, and atleast 1 arbies --{{User:AnimeSucks/Sig}} 06:18, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *:'''Re:''' - I could go messing with your pages... joking... is that really against? -{{User:Lithedarkangel/signature}} 06:27, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Against''' - Hello all! I return from the dark depths of hell just to vote against this user! No, I kid but seriously I have never heard of this person and I don't see any great contributions of his that are that are sysop worthy.--{{User:SirArgo/Signature}} 06:51, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Vouch''' - He's a nice guy and I always see him contributing when I check out recent changes. Li has made some requests on A/SD and A/MR from what I can remember, and I think he would be a great janitorial psyop. --{{User:Zombie slay3r/Signature}} 06:56, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Against''' - As mentioned above.--[[User:MisterGame|Thadeous Oakley]] 07:31, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *:lol bias. :D --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 11:12, 5 January 2009 (UTC) | |
| *::Hey, its a valid vote.--[[User:MisterGame|Thadeous Oakley]] 15:03, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *:::First, promotions aren't a vote. Second, it was a joke. :) --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 20:32, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *::::Got me there, I always name it voting. Second, I did not mean my words in a harsh way, next time I will put along a corresponding smiley :D.--[[User:MisterGame|Thadeous Oakley]] 20:48, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Against''' Not having heard of you I can't vouch that I trust your judgement... If sysop status just gave you janitorial powers that would not be an issue but as it gives more than that I am going to have to see more of you in areas where i can gauge you better before I will vouch! --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 11:31, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Abstain''' Lithe is definitely heading towards sysop status, and does indeed do a lot of those dull things that makes sysops so sysopy. '''However''' I haven't seen a lot of interaction helping new users, discussing rule changes or even on [[developing suggestions]]. Don't take this as a criticism but get out there a bit more! get involved in debates,vote on stuff like [[deletions]] and don't feed those trolls. If you're ever stuck for ideas, just leave me a message. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 15:20, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Question''' - Do you usually watch/read/stalk the A/D, A/SD, A/MR, A/VB etc. Pages? --{{User:Janus Abernathy/Sig}} 16:04, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *:'''Re''' - Not that much... yes... yes... almost every time... I stalk the RC --{{User:Lithedarkangel/signature}} 01:36, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ==Candidates currently under community discussion==
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| ==Archived Promotions==
| |
| | |
| *[[:Category:Promotions Candidacies|Complete list of Promotion Requests]]
| |
| *[[:Category:Successful Promotions Candidacies|Successful Promotions Candidacies]]
| |
| *[[:Category:Unsuccessful Promotions Candidacies|Unsuccessful Promotions Candidacies]]
| |
| *[[:Category:Unaccepted Nominations|Unaccepted Nominations]]
| |
| *[[:Category:Withdrawn Promotions Candidacies|Withdrawn Promotions Candidacies]]
| |
This page is for users to request System Operator status. The act of user promotion is restricted to those with bureaucrat status, and as such users will need to request user promotion here. System Operators and Bureaucrats cannot assign promotions unless the request has gone through this page.
Guidelines for System Operator Requests
Users who wish to request System Operator status (and users who wish to nominate other users for System Operator status) should note that before they can be considered the following guidelines should be met by the candidate:
- Significant time within the community.
- We define this as at least 6 months since the candidate's first edit.
- Note: looking in a User's User contributions might give false results for this criterion, as the edit history is periodically purged on this wiki.
- Significant activity within the community.
- We define this as at least 250 edits in the past six months under the candidate's name.
- Note: looking in a User's User contributions might give false results for this criterion, as the edit history is periodically purged on this wiki.
- Prior interest in maintaining the community.
- We define this as clear evidence that the candidate is already performing maintenance tasks and taking leadership roles on the wiki.
- Desire to become a System Operator.
- We define this simply as indicating in the candidate's request their desire for the position (Note that if a person is nominated by another user, the candidate in question should note their acceptance of the nomination).
If a user is highly exemplary in one criterion, a certain amount of leeway may be given with the other criteria.
Once the candidate satisfies these guidelines, the user is then subject to a community discussion. All users are asked to comment on the candidate in question, ask questions of the candidate, and discuss the candidate's suitability for becoming a System Operator. This is not a vote. It is instead merely a request for comments from the wiki community. This will continue for two weeks to allow all users an opportunity to voice their opinion regarding a candidate's qualifications for promotion. After two weeks, the Bureaucrats are responsible for announcing their decision within a reasonably short period of time. Users may continue to add their thoughts until the Bureaucrats announce their decision. The current amount of System Operators running should not influence your decisions when voicing your opinion.
Once the two weeks are up, the Bureaucrats will review the community discussion and make a decision based upon it. The user will be notified of the status of their request, and will be promoted should it appear that the community is willing to accept them as a System Operator.
Example Application
I've been around 3 months, and I've made to date 550 edits. As you can see [link here] and [link here], I've been in the leadership role attempting to create a new format for this page. I'd very much like to become a System Operator.
- Vouch - I am willing to vouch for this user. -- Voucher 03:41, 23 Jan 2006 (GMT)
- Against - Example User, I haven't seen any evidence of your work on the wiki. --Some user 19:01, 25 July 2006 (BST)
- Vouch - Example User is the most active guy here. --Another user 19:01, 25 July 2006 (BST)
- Abstain - I'm just not sure, but I don't want to say why for some reason. --Some other user 19:01, 25 July 2006 (BST)
- Question - I just want to know what you think about this subject? --Yet another user 21:26, 4 April 2013 (BST)
Candidates Being Discussed
There are no candidates at this time.
Recent Bids
Archived Bids
For earlier promotion bids, see the following:
