UDWiki:Administration/Promotions: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Shortcut|[[A/PM]]}}
{{Shortcut|[[A/PM]]}}
{{Moderationnav}}
{{Administrationnav}}
{{Promotions Intro}}
{{:A/PM/Intro}}
==Candidates still requiring vouches==
<!-- ''Place all new promotion bids under this header'' -->
''Place all new promotion bids under this header''


==Candidates Being Discussed==
<!---


''There are no candidates at this time.''


==Candidates currently under community discussion==
!--->
===[[User:Suicidalangel| Suicidal Angel]]===
''There are no candidates at this time.''
'''General stuffs'''


*My first edit was back in May-ish of '07, so I've been here for a long time.
==Recent Bids==
*Some 5000 or more edits total. History purge makes lieeeeeeees!
*In that time I've helped newbies beyond the WN spamming, helped shape a policy here and there, tried and failed to get my own policy through (Didn't have enough voters total, can you believe it? Made me wanna cry), reverted vandalism, some suggestions maintenance, along with over all maintenance everywhere, including the admin pages when possible for me.
*I've only been warned due to a frivolous case against myself in A/VB, and because of an edit that was out of pure fun with [[User:Seventythree|73]] back when there was a large amount of spamming going on in the wiki. Also, the edit in question is the reason I put up the frivolous case.
*My desire to become a Sysops would be simply because I like mops and buckets. Shit needs to be done, always will, it's a job that I can do and like it.
*It seems the biggest reason many of the community was against my last bid was because of my inactivity. I've been active again since early November of '08, and was only inactive from the start because of health issues. I'm here to stay until I start hacking up blood again. :D
*I know the guidelines and policies rather well, and if there's something I'm not sure on, then I'll voice my opinion on it, but not provide anything binding or ruling.


'''Recent problems with some of the Admin team'''
===[[User:Hagnat]]===
*[[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Hagnat/2019-08-14 Promotion|Archived as Unsuccessful]].


*I don't drink anymore, so I'm not going to get smashed and let a friend play on my account ;)
===[[User:DanceDanceRevolution]]===
*I will own up to my actions, and not bug out if I screw up.
*[[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/DanceDanceRevolution/2018-07-30 Promotion|Archived as Successful]].
*I won't be bypassing all that pesky red tape. Even if it is pesky.


'''Ummmm...Needs moar words?'''
==Archived Bids==
 
''For earlier promotion bids, see the following:''
*I understand that the community changes over time, and will put my self up for review every six months should I be promoted. And should I break that word, I ask another sysops to do it for me, citing this bullet in my bid, thus invalidating any say against said review. If I'm not doing a good enough job, then I shouldn't be a sysops. Simple as that. If I'm not promoted, then disregard this, as I'm a pre-emptive idiot.
*[[:Category:{{CURRENTYEAR}}_Promotion_Archives|This year's promotion bids]]
 
*[[:Category:{{LASTYEAR}}_Promotion_Archives|Last year's promotion bids]]
Again, let me know what I need to work on.
*[[A/SA|Sysop Archives]] for older bids and related sysop activities
--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 01:42, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 
----
 
*(Dammit, I thought you were Iscariot). I am, of course, in support. Might I add that Engel is a good, honest, friendly, humorous user. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 01:44, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
**I thought I'd say that the whole "we have enough sysops" just isn't true. You can never really have enough, and there should always be a sysops on at all times able to stop [[UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2009_01#User:Umbrellaarezergs.21|vandals]]. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 19:11, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
* '''vouch''' - good contributor --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:53, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Against''' - I urge the candidate to reconsider his standing. Any running validates the current administration and belittles the will of the community. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 03:11, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - Good contributor, friendly and would make a good janitor. Although I'm tempted to vote against because you are making us have two bids run at once ;P. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 03:22, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
::And on a second read thorough, I must add that that's a tremendous risk your taking by putting yourself up for reevaluation every six months (somehow I missed that first time :/,) and only adds to my confidence :P. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 03:25, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
*<s>'''Abstain''' - While I am sure that you would make a great sysop, I just don't think we need another right now. I think that in the current standing of the wiki, another sysop would only add to the confusion of the matters that are going down right now and won't do much good. I do not wish to vote against you however because, like I said, if people decide to vote you in I'm sure you will do a good job.--{{User:SirArgo/Signature}} 03:26, 15 January 2009 (UTC)</s>
:*'''Vouch''' - After seeing how you acted on [[Talk:Umbrella Biohazard Containment Service/Umbrella]], you have my full vote now!--{{User:SirArgo/Signature}} 22:14, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
'''Third vouch received''' 03:25, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
*<s>'''Abstain''' - As SirArgo WRT the whole not-needing-another-sysop thing, plus I feel like he's a little... erratic. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 04:18, 15 January 2009 (UTC)</s>
*'''Vouch''' - Just saw the first bullet point under the Recent Problems heading. ;p --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 08:14, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - I have much faith in this user.--<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]], self-proclaimed Decider of Everything and Ruler of All</span> 05:08, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - As karek. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 05:18, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' there's nowt wrong with having a bunch of sops, and the Angels a good candidate. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 08:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' Always had a keen eye for what is right and a good humored way to point it out. Frankly the "Deletions Scandal" won you my vouch long ago--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 08:22, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
*:Just like Link I have just noticed something new in your bid... Under recent problems bullets you neglect to mention that you will not be staging a coup, does that mean its no longer recent enough or that we should be ready to hail a new wiki overlord?--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 14:36, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
*::Bah, fine, I won't be your new overlord either. Happy? :) --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 15:05, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
*:::'''NO''' I demand a wiki overlord to crush the sysops and make boxy do our bidding!--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 18:26, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
*::::Ummm....Shit. I really don't know how to reply to this one. :) --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 18:36, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
*:::::Don't bother then. Honest's attention whore factor jumps by an order of magnitude every time anything to do with a sysop occurs (which means basically constantly). --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 22:28, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
*::::::So says the Uber Troll :)
*:::::::Lighten up Bob, it was a joke and there is no point trolling me cos i just will not bite (though i may throw stuff and sulk) --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 23:57, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
*:::::::DO HO HO HO --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 00:31, 16 January 2009 (UTC).
*:::::::::::::::::indentationwhat?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 23:08, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - As Link (except for being tempted to vote against). --[[User:Midianian|Midianian]]<small><sup>&#124;[[User talk:Midianian|T]]&#124;[[Developing Suggestions|DS]]&#124;[[:Category:Recently Closed Suggestions|C:RCS]]&#124;</sup></small> 12:14, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - Believe me, I was sure you were already a sysop :P --{{User:Janus Abernathy/Sig}} 13:05, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - but you knew that anyway. Just to clarify my friend didn't actually play on the account. It was all me, he was just nearby loling, good luck with the sobriety though. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:15, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
*:Monsieur Angel, sober for 1 and a half years!--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 15:05, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - From what I have seen from him, he can be a good sysop.--[[User:MisterGame|Thadeous Oakley]] 16:21, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - We need a good sysop with a sense of humor. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 21:52, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''vouch''' - for great fun when Iscariot brings misconduct against you.  you know he will.  No sysop is safe!--{{User:AnimeSucks/Sig}} 22:10, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - One of those people who should have been made a Sysop a long time ago and it's nice to have someone with a sense of humour around here :D. Your promise to be re-evaluated every 6 months is a brave thing to do and it removes any doubts I might have had about your promotion.--{{User:The General/sig}} 22:15, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''vouch''' - Anyone who has all vouches except for Iscariot gets an automatic vouch. Plus looking at the edit logs you do good wiki. [[User:Conndraka|Conndraka]]<sup>[[Moderation|mod]] [[User_talk:Conndraka|T]][[AZM]] [[Coalition for Fair Tactics|''CFT'']]</sup> 22:17, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - But I expect gold in the basket. --[[User:Saromu|Sonny Corleone]] <sup>[[DORIS]] [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pXfHLUlZf4 I jizzed in my pants]  [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91a8pHj7V9k pr0n]</sup> 02:57, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - only because he would never let me live it down. moar posts in the count to a million plz!----[[User:Sexualharrison|Sexualharrison]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] [[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]] 16:48, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
*{{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Cryptic/1}}'''Voet''' - Never gonna give you up. {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Cryptic/2}}  {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 18:25, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - Good sense of humor, nice guy, and great contributor to the wiki.  --{{User:Zombie slay3r/Signature}} 22:49, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
* SA is well qualified and has an easy going personality. He'll make a fine addition to the current team, and should have gone for a promotion ages ago.--<small><span style="border: 2px solid #DDD">[[User:Vista|'''<span style="background-color: Ivory; color:Black">&nbsp;Vista&nbsp;</span>''']][[User_talk:Vista|<span style="background-color: #DDD; color: Ivory ">&nbsp;T&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 16:27, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
*We might not get along well, but whatever.  Have your silly '''vouch'''.  It all means very little to me.  As of now, anyways... --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 23:33, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - I'm practically a newbie, but my vouch is being added here because it's what I think, even though it won't be needed. {{User:Liberty/Sign}} 12:18, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Against''' I think he's an asshole and I don't trust his little butt buddy relationship with Iscariot. Especially since Iscariot wants SA to put him up for sysop. ''I have already given Cat 4 authorisation to certain users, yourself included, for the purposes of a serious bid if that is the will of the community.'' J3D's friends fucked him - I bet SA's friends will do the same. --[[Image:Globetrotters_Icon.png|15px]] '''[[User:DCC/Suggestions|#99]]'''  <sup>''[[User:DCC|DCC]] ''</sup> 23:55, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 
==Archived Promotions==
 
*[[:Category:Promotions Candidacies|Complete list of Promotion Requests]]
*[[:Category:Successful Promotions Candidacies|Successful Promotions Candidacies]]
*[[:Category:Unsuccessful Promotions Candidacies|Unsuccessful Promotions Candidacies]]
*[[:Category:Unaccepted Nominations|Unaccepted Nominations]]
*[[:Category:Withdrawn Promotions Candidacies|Withdrawn Promotions Candidacies]]

Latest revision as of 08:31, 14 August 2019

Administration Services

Sysop List (Check) | Guidelines | Policies (Discussion) | Promotions (Bureaucrat) | Re-Evaluations

Deletions (Scheduling) | Speedy Deletions | Undeletions | Vandal Banning (Bots) | Vandal Data (De-Escalations)

Protections (Scheduling) | Move Requests | Arbitration | Misconduct | Demotions | Discussion | Sysop Archives

This page is for users to request System Operator status. The act of user promotion is restricted to those with bureaucrat status, and as such users will need to request user promotion here. System Operators and Bureaucrats cannot assign promotions unless the request has gone through this page.

Guidelines for System Operator Requests

Users who wish to request System Operator status (and users who wish to nominate other users for System Operator status) should note that before they can be considered the following guidelines should be met by the candidate:

  • Significant time within the community.
We define this as at least 6 months since the candidate's first edit.
Note: looking in a User's User contributions might give false results for this criterion, as the edit history is periodically purged on this wiki.
  • Significant activity within the community.
We define this as at least 250 edits in the past six months under the candidate's name.
Note: looking in a User's User contributions might give false results for this criterion, as the edit history is periodically purged on this wiki.
  • Prior interest in maintaining the community.
We define this as clear evidence that the candidate is already performing maintenance tasks and taking leadership roles on the wiki.
  • Desire to become a System Operator.
We define this simply as indicating in the candidate's request their desire for the position (Note that if a person is nominated by another user, the candidate in question should note their acceptance of the nomination).

If a user is highly exemplary in one criterion, a certain amount of leeway may be given with the other criteria.

Once the candidate satisfies these guidelines, the user is then subject to a community discussion. All users are asked to comment on the candidate in question, ask questions of the candidate, and discuss the candidate's suitability for becoming a System Operator. This is not a vote. It is instead merely a request for comments from the wiki community. This will continue for two weeks to allow all users an opportunity to voice their opinion regarding a candidate's qualifications for promotion. After two weeks, the Bureaucrats are responsible for announcing their decision within a reasonably short period of time. Users may continue to add their thoughts until the Bureaucrats announce their decision. The current amount of System Operators running should not influence your decisions when voicing your opinion.

Once the two weeks are up, the Bureaucrats will review the community discussion and make a decision based upon it. The user will be notified of the status of their request, and will be promoted should it appear that the community is willing to accept them as a System Operator.

Example Application

Example User

I've been around 3 months, and I've made to date 550 edits. As you can see [link here] and [link here], I've been in the leadership role attempting to create a new format for this page. I'd very much like to become a System Operator.

  • Vouch - I am willing to vouch for this user. -- Voucher 03:41, 23 Jan 2006 (GMT)
  • Against - Example User, I haven't seen any evidence of your work on the wiki. --Some user 19:01, 25 July 2006 (BST)
  • Vouch - Example User is the most active guy here. --Another user 19:01, 25 July 2006 (BST)
  • Abstain - I'm just not sure, but I don't want to say why for some reason. --Some other user 19:01, 25 July 2006 (BST)
  • Question - I just want to know what you think about this subject? --Yet another user 21:26, 4 April 2013 (BST)


Candidates Being Discussed

There are no candidates at this time.

Recent Bids

User:Hagnat

User:DanceDanceRevolution

Archived Bids

For earlier promotion bids, see the following: