UDWiki:Administration/Promotions: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Shortcut|[[A/PM]]}}
{{Shortcut|[[A/PM]]}}
{{Moderationnav}}
{{Administrationnav}}
{{Promotions Intro}}
{{:A/PM/Intro}}
==Candidates still requiring vouches==
<!-- ''Place all new promotion bids under this header'' -->
''Place all new promotion bids under this header''


===[[User:Honestmistake]]===
==Candidates Being Discussed==  
He has more than enough contributions, although the history purge screws with the contributor history. He has been here more than a year now, has taken an active interest in the maintenance duties and policy discussions on this wiki and, while we don't always agree is the kind of user I think should be promoted. He has proven he is able to do the job and more than qualifies. So, assuming he accepts, I think it's about time we gave him a bid.--<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 01:32, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
<!---


*'''Vouch''' - I put him up here, it would be strange if I didn't vouch. I believe he would be a good Sysop. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 01:32, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
''There are no candidates at this time.''
*'''Vouch''' - I've known him on the suggestion pages for a while. He's a good guy, doesn't get involved in too much drama and is reasonably level-headed. Not sure if he wants this, though. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 01:36, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Against''' - too fucking serious too much of the time.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 01:44, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - Look. 3 vouches. Now he has to accept. Although he might not. Did I mention '''Vouch'''? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 01:46, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Against''' - We do not need yet another rules-whoring crybaby on the sysop team. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 01:53, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Strongly Against''' This user has shown time and time again that he fails to comprehend basic concepts. His arguments are emotional, weak (at best), nonsensical and off topic. I seriously wonder if someone hacked Karek's account to make him do this. --{{User:Nubis/sig}} 02:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
*:The "You Ass" section on Karek's Talk page is more than enough to show what I am talking about. The section where Karek says about HM:''Iscariot and you both has a long history of disliking the sysops and raging against the machine for the sake of it, I deal with Iscariot off of the wiki and know he acts very differently here and I know you can be reasonable but often enough fall into the category of opposing the sysops for the sake of it that I often find myself having to take your comments on something with a grain of salt. '' RAGING VOUCH there Karek! --{{User:Nubis/sig}} 02:20, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
*::He may be one to argue but he is also willing to admit when he is wrong about something if discussion is actually attempted. He only argues because he actually cares about how the rules are enforced, not like some others who do it simply to cause drama. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 04:41, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Strong 'gainst''' - Done nothinto deserve this, other wise as Cyberbob/Nubis... WTF hae you been smoking Karke?--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 02:34, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Abstain''' - Sorry.  I know Honest is contributive, but I'm not sure he's up to the task. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 02:37, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Abstain''' - ''Pros:'' Honestmistake is a solid user and with a long history of interest and contributions. Usually listens to reason and almost always avoids drama. ''Cons:'' Sometimes comes up with really weird, illogical positions on what seem to be pretty straightforward issues. ''Concusion:'' More time and more active participation in Admin stuff, then he might be an excellent candidate. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 03:48, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Against'''I don't see him that often, nor do I see any great contributions.--[[User:MisterGame|Thadeous Oakley]] 09:58, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - Free sysops for everybody \õ/ --<small>—The preceding [[Special:Listusers/sysop|signed]] comment was added by [[User:Hagnat|Hagnat]] ([[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Hagnat|contribs]]) at</small> 10:56, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
*:honestmistake is a good and caring gontributor. he is not the kind who acts for the lulz, so he wont fuck up with his admin powers  --<small>—The preceding [[Special:Listusers/sysop|signed]] comment was added by [[User:Hagnat|Hagnat]] ([[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Hagnat|contribs]]) at</small> 10:56, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
*::Given the [[User:Amazing|company you keep]] I'm sure you'll forgive people if they don't find your character reference all that exciting. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 11:07, 31 January 2009 (UTC)


==Candidates currently under community discussion==
!--->
''There are no candidates at this time.''


==Recent Bids==


==Archived Promotions==
===[[User:Hagnat]]===
*[[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Hagnat/2019-08-14 Promotion|Archived as Unsuccessful]].


*[[:Category:Promotions Candidacies|Complete list of Promotion Requests]]
===[[User:DanceDanceRevolution]]===
*[[:Category:Successful Promotions Candidacies|Successful Promotions Candidacies]]
*[[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/DanceDanceRevolution/2018-07-30 Promotion|Archived as Successful]].
*[[:Category:Unsuccessful Promotions Candidacies|Unsuccessful Promotions Candidacies]]
 
*[[:Category:Unaccepted Nominations|Unaccepted Nominations]]
==Archived Bids==
*[[:Category:Withdrawn Promotions Candidacies|Withdrawn Promotions Candidacies]]
''For earlier promotion bids, see the following:''
*[[:Category:{{CURRENTYEAR}}_Promotion_Archives|This year's promotion bids]]
*[[:Category:{{LASTYEAR}}_Promotion_Archives|Last year's promotion bids]]
*[[A/SA|Sysop Archives]] for older bids and related sysop activities

Latest revision as of 08:31, 14 August 2019

Administration Services

Sysop List (Check) | Guidelines | Policies (Discussion) | Promotions (Bureaucrat) | Re-Evaluations

Deletions (Scheduling) | Speedy Deletions | Undeletions | Vandal Banning (Bots) | Vandal Data (De-Escalations)

Protections (Scheduling) | Move Requests | Arbitration | Misconduct | Demotions | Discussion | Sysop Archives

This page is for users to request System Operator status. The act of user promotion is restricted to those with bureaucrat status, and as such users will need to request user promotion here. System Operators and Bureaucrats cannot assign promotions unless the request has gone through this page.

Guidelines for System Operator Requests

Users who wish to request System Operator status (and users who wish to nominate other users for System Operator status) should note that before they can be considered the following guidelines should be met by the candidate:

  • Significant time within the community.
We define this as at least 6 months since the candidate's first edit.
Note: looking in a User's User contributions might give false results for this criterion, as the edit history is periodically purged on this wiki.
  • Significant activity within the community.
We define this as at least 250 edits in the past six months under the candidate's name.
Note: looking in a User's User contributions might give false results for this criterion, as the edit history is periodically purged on this wiki.
  • Prior interest in maintaining the community.
We define this as clear evidence that the candidate is already performing maintenance tasks and taking leadership roles on the wiki.
  • Desire to become a System Operator.
We define this simply as indicating in the candidate's request their desire for the position (Note that if a person is nominated by another user, the candidate in question should note their acceptance of the nomination).

If a user is highly exemplary in one criterion, a certain amount of leeway may be given with the other criteria.

Once the candidate satisfies these guidelines, the user is then subject to a community discussion. All users are asked to comment on the candidate in question, ask questions of the candidate, and discuss the candidate's suitability for becoming a System Operator. This is not a vote. It is instead merely a request for comments from the wiki community. This will continue for two weeks to allow all users an opportunity to voice their opinion regarding a candidate's qualifications for promotion. After two weeks, the Bureaucrats are responsible for announcing their decision within a reasonably short period of time. Users may continue to add their thoughts until the Bureaucrats announce their decision. The current amount of System Operators running should not influence your decisions when voicing your opinion.

Once the two weeks are up, the Bureaucrats will review the community discussion and make a decision based upon it. The user will be notified of the status of their request, and will be promoted should it appear that the community is willing to accept them as a System Operator.

Example Application

Example User

I've been around 3 months, and I've made to date 550 edits. As you can see [link here] and [link here], I've been in the leadership role attempting to create a new format for this page. I'd very much like to become a System Operator.

  • Vouch - I am willing to vouch for this user. -- Voucher 03:41, 23 Jan 2006 (GMT)
  • Against - Example User, I haven't seen any evidence of your work on the wiki. --Some user 19:01, 25 July 2006 (BST)
  • Vouch - Example User is the most active guy here. --Another user 19:01, 25 July 2006 (BST)
  • Abstain - I'm just not sure, but I don't want to say why for some reason. --Some other user 19:01, 25 July 2006 (BST)
  • Question - I just want to know what you think about this subject? --Yet another user 21:26, 4 April 2013 (BST)


Candidates Being Discussed

There are no candidates at this time.

Recent Bids

User:Hagnat

User:DanceDanceRevolution

Archived Bids

For earlier promotion bids, see the following: