Suggestion:20071002 Moble Nechrotech accessing Device

	Dupe
	This suggestion has been found to be a dupe of recent suggestion. Dupes are easily found by searching for them in the main and suggestion namespaces.

Mobile NecroNet Accessing Device

--Rhett 03:01, 2 October 2007 (BST)

Suggestion Type New Item

Suggestion Scope Survivors

Suggestion Description

I have been playing Urbandead for a good while. And I think it would be useful if you could access Necrotech without being in a powered NT. I propose that you could be able to find a laptop like device with wireless connection into NecroNet. You would be able to find them in a Necrotech building at 2% search rate, standard search rate bonus still applies for a search in a lighted Necrotech building. For the device to work there would need to be a powered Necrotech building in the suburb and a powered and running local mobile phone mast. This makes sense because you must figure that laptops were in existence during the outbreak, and that in this constant battle with zombies, scientists would understand the value of mobile reconnaissance and data collection. This would give more value to the skill NecroNet Access. To use the device you must have the skill NecroNet Access. The device could be called something like the "MNAD" for short.

---

Voting Section

Voting Rules

Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped. # justification ~~~~ Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

Kill Votes

1. Kill - incomplete. i don't think it can be counted as dupe because it's not described what an item will do --~~~~ [talk] 09:22, 2 October 2007 (BST)

Spam/Dupe Votes

1. Dupe - Oh, my GOD! Can we please wait till this one is out of circulation!!! ~A`Blue`Jelly^TME*V*I*L*_? 03:21, 2 October 2007 (BST)

   PS I have no clue on how the "proper" format states the voting section should be, but at least this thing now HAS one... (added the Voting section... You Like? ) ~A`Blue`Jelly^TME*V*I*L*_? 03:28, 2 October 2007 (BST)

2. Dupe - As above. I just voted for that suggestion the other day and this one's almost identical to it. --Sonofagun18 06:12, 2 October 2007 (BST)
3. Dupe - For chrissakes, at least read the current suggestions before making new ones.--Jiangyingzi 07:47, 2 October 2007 (BST)
4. El Dupeo Fuerte - Yeah....I can' speak Spanish. Regardless, it's a dupe. And a +1!.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 11:40, 2 October 2007 (BST)
5. Dupe --Abi79 ^AB 14:19, 2 October 2007 (BST)
6. OMG! EPIC DUPE! - Driaquer hit the nail on the with this one. Atleast read the current suggestions. Antitribu 14:21, 2 October 2007 (BST)
7. More NADs for UD! At least change the name. --MrCoolantSpray 14:32, 2 October 2007 (BST)
8. Dupe of doom ‬‮Dupe of doom ‭‬‭ ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 17:16, 2 October 2007 (BST)
9. Dupesessessfes - We need more dupes captain!--  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 19:04, 2 October 2007 (BST)
10. Dupe - Aye aye, Mr Gnome. Prepare the duplicated dupes! --Pavluk ^{A! E!} 19:15, 2 October 2007 (BST)
11. Duplication Tis' only an almost exact replica of my suggestion. --Taint 20:58, 2 October 2007 (BST)
12. Dupe Come ON, if you're not going to be bothered to search the archives for a dupe, at least look at the currents! --Howard Bentley 21:26, 2 October 2007 (BST)
13. Dupe. Link given. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 00:19, 3 October 2007 (BST)
14. Dupe - Might as well hop on.--Karek^maps?! 05:19, 3 October 2007 (BST)
15. No, no, and NO! Dupe. Glenstone 06:31, 3 October 2007 (BST)
16. Doop - SHEESH... --WanYao 13:32, 3 October 2007 (BST)