UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Boxy/2008-06-06 Misconduct

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Administration » Sysop Archives » Boxy » 2008-06-06 Misconduct


Browse the Sysop Archives
Bureaucrat Promotions | Demotions | Misconduct (TBD) | Promotions | Re-Evaluations
2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019

2008, June 6

Closed this policy prematurely, stating that it was "humorous" - despite my stated intent that I fully intended to have it get passed (or failed) and thus warned and/or banned as a result.
I am, and was, serious as a heart attack.
And come on: you know that a misconduct case is the logical - nay, required - next step in this entire farce. The past week has shown that the community is perfectly willing to throw up stupid misconduct cases, so adding one of my own is par for the course.--Jorm 06:31, 5 June 2008 (BST)

So basically your admitting your part of the problem, amusing but useless if your intended goal is to fix it. Not Misconduct.--Karekmaps?! 07:55, 5 June 2008 (BST)
Not Misconduct - I was tempted to remove it myself to be honest. There was no way the policy could ever be taken seriously considering the mess of the voting. -- Cheese 18:06, 5 June 2008 (BST)
No, I'm saying that you are part of the problem, and I'm trying to show you how utterly retarded this entire system is.--Jorm 18:29, 5 June 2008 (BST)
No, you're throwing a tantrum because you think it will make a point, it's failing. All you've done is show you know how to play stupid too. You want the system to change try actually making it change.--Karekmaps?! 04:49, 6 June 2008 (BST)
"blah, blah, blah, I am totally, absolutely, one-hundred-percent part of the 'stupid' crowd that is being complained about, but I'm going to act like I'm not, and try to shift the idiocy onto someone else."--Jorm 09:07, 6 June 2008 (BST)
Congratulations, you can ignore people and insult, maturity plus 10 for you, now try realizing that you're just as much of a problem as everyone you complain so much about because all you're doing is adding to the problem by behaving in the manner you are.--Karekmaps?! 10:32, 6 June 2008 (BST)
"blah, blah, blah, I am totally, absolutely, one-hundred-percent part of the 'stupid' crowd that is being complained about, but I'm going to act like I'm not, and try to shift the idiocy onto someone else." --brb, church DORIS CGR U! 10:37, 6 June 2008 (BST)
Not Misconduct - a joke gone too far. --People's Commissar Hagnat talk - mod 19:49, 5 June 2008 (BST)
Not Misconduct - Twas funny.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 05:04, 6 June 2008 (BST)
As a survivor of open heart surgery, I have to say, you rank as maybe .0000001% as seriously as a heart attack. If that much. SIM Core Map.png Swiers 09:10, 6 June 2008 (BST)
Ok, a real ruling based on the facts of the case instead of the knee jerking above. As it stands, there is no method by which policy discussions are to be officially removed. And its not defined as a sysop ability. On those grounds, its Not Misconduct, same as the vote striking wasnt misconduct. Which means this matter should have been taken to A/VB. However, unlike vote striking, where you are censoring the opinions of people who have their rights to be there, it was wrong and vandalism (And the subsequent vandal cases upheld that). In this case however the policy was made in a bad faith attempt to fuck up the wiki, and its removal was entirely justifiable in that context. Sorry about that jorm, but thems the breaks. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 10:52, 6 June 2008 (BST)
Vandal cases upheld it? Sorry, which ones were those again? --brb, church DORIS CGR U! 10:54, 6 June 2008 (BST)
He's talking about the vote striking. Not to mention that that was a ruling made while the policy was still in development.--Karekmaps?! 10:58, 6 June 2008 (BST)
Karek has the right of it, it was patently obvious what i was referring to. You seem to be suffering from a condition called selective reading. I suggest taking 2000 milligrams of morphine and sleeping it off :P or maybe just learn to read. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 11:13, 6 June 2008 (BST)
Not patently obvious, your peculiar use of less punctuation marks than most people and awkward phrasing (also capital letters) makes it tricky to make distinctions like that in your writing sometimes. --brb, church DORIS CGR U! 11:29, 6 June 2008 (BST)
I had just mentioned the vote striking thing saying it was wrong and vandalism, then put in brackets that such was upheld by the vandal cases. The only possible way it could have been clearer would have been if i had wrote it in invisible text. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 11:34, 6 June 2008 (BST)
You're actually wrong, but to explain in depth why would requre delving into topics too close to school for comfort. --brb, church DORIS CGR U! 11:37, 6 June 2008 (BST)
The intent was made abundantly clear by the context. You chose to creatively interpret it in an attempt to get in a weak shot. The whole "You are wrong, but i wont explain why" is a complete cop out. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 11:40, 6 June 2008 (BST)
Indeed it is a copout. Did you not get the message that I don't care? --brb, church DORIS CGR U! 11:44, 6 June 2008 (BST)
You care enough to reply. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 11:54, 6 June 2008 (BST)
You're an idiot. I don't care that it's a copout. --brb, church DORIS CGR U! 12:47, 6 June 2008 (BST)
And yet you persist. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 12:50, 6 June 2008 (BST)
Persist in what? You aren't making any sense. Just because I don't feel like expanding on "you're wrong" doesn't mean I've lost interest altogether. --brb, church DORIS CGR U! 12:53, 6 June 2008 (BST)