User talk:BoboKilledMe

I'd appreciate any new comments be put on top with a header, but only in the form of ==Title==. Also please no links in the title, that is very irritating and I will change it.

By posting here you agree to these conditions:

I reserve the right to change spelling and format to whatever I want as pertains to title headers, but I will never change(spelling errors,intention,words,etc.) nor delete a post made here by any user unless I deem it to be in extremely bad taste, then it will be deleted without notice. By "extremely bad taste" I am describing Ad Hominem attacks, explicit language aimed towards me or another user that has posted here, and any attempts to cause me undue stress. And under no circumstance, unless I explicitly ask a Sysop or I do it myself, is my user page nor talk page to be reverted, edited in any way other than leaving a comment as specified above, nor vandalized as of the current rules November 07, 2007. This is enacted retroactively. BKM

---

                                         Post Below Here

---

Lol

I have an entire USER dedicate to me? Awesome!!! By the way, It think it says "I'm a PKer" on my user page at least 3 time, so this page is unnecesarry and should be put up for deletion. =P BoboTalkClown 19:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

BTW, what revenge? BoboTalkClown 19:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Did I label you "trenchcoater"? Or PKer? If it's PKer, I'll gladly change it, but if it's trenchie, the nope, sorry. Tough. BoboTalkClown 20:32, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

BTW, are you "IAngerPeople"? BoboTalkClown 20:32, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Ohhhh... so this complicates things a bit. Surrrreee, I'll restore your name. BoboTalkClown 17:26, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Please remember...

...To sign your sign your votes. --The Grimch ^{U! E! WAT!} 05:03, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Just remove the strike template, the strike note text, and add your signature --The Grimch ^{U! E! WAT!} 11:44, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

You dun vote silly

The abuse you refer too would be minimal. Why? Because after they vandalise, they need to wait 2 whole months, making 250 decent edits in the process, before they can then go and make one act of vandalism. Then its another two months and 250 more edits to do it again. Yes, it could be abused, but the abuse would result in such low levels of vandalism it would blend into the background. A true vandal isnt that patient, and would slip up and cop something nasty long before he even finishes his third repetition. --The Grimch ^{U! E! WAT!} 10:42, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

The link to your group page...

The link on your user page does not work. Just so you know. --Darth Lumis^{T! A! E!} 03:10, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Re: Scent-Trails

Clarifications are perfectly acceptable (look in the voting rules below the suggestion). I didn't withdraw and revise it because a lot of people had already voted. And if you look at my example to Jon Pyre, you'll see how it can be useful. Also, you should sign your votes. --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 05:21, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Edits To The Suggestion...

I'm sorry, but I believe that the votes displaying properly is more important than you making sense. I apologize for your improper use of the Return Key. Any sort of "break" such as <br /> , <br /></p> , and (obviously) the Return Key resets the counting if the line isn't proceeded by a "#" (or a "#:", if you don't want it to count as a number). For future reference, don't use it. I merely assumed it was a separate comment because of the line-break. Oh, and get used to it... It's a WIKI. I respect what others say, but screwing with the format of an important (yet somewhat cluttered) section of the Wiki or very (verrrrrrrrry) bad spelling is a no-no^{according to me}. ~A`Blue`Jelly^TME*V*I*L*_? 01:50, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Ooooooooh, KK, I get it now. It was sorta that other guy's fault... Well, it looked like that was how it was supposed to be, so I merely fixed it up that way. Still, don't do what I said above in your voting. ~A`Blue`Jelly^TME*V*I*L*_? 02:19, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Did you even READ the second thing I said? I said it was kinda the OTHER GUY'S FAULT, and that it merely LOOKED LIKE THAT WAS HOW IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE. It was your RE that screwed it up, but the fault of that was, once more, THE OTHER GUY's for putting it in the middle of your RE. From now on, don't use returns in REs of votes, and something like this will never happen again. Oh, and before I forget, WHY do you know Java bot not basic HTML? ~A`Blue`Jelly^TME*V*I*L*_? 04:25, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

PS: If you're wondering why I also reply here, it 's so you know I've said something. I like to keep as full of a copy of talk-page conversations on My talk page. This gives you a notification. ~A`Blue`Jelly^TME*V*I*L*_?

Re: Voting Question

I have answered your question in the voting. Typically, I vote on something and I do not go back to check on the votes unless it is something that I am very keenly interested in following -- which is rare. Anyway, I hope my answer clears up my thinking on the subject... Also, I am just too lazy to find the "Who are are you holding" suggestion... :) --WanYao 20:06, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Killer Template Clowns from Outer Space

	Play on Names
	This user received a template with his likeness. Get it? I consider this a possible re-enactment of the tragic event. Like Bruce Wayne's parents being killed, but more personal.

I got bored and decided to make templates as play on names of people. All sorts of people. You didn't do anything bad to get this. I just have too much free time at work and I'm out of AP. Enjoy! --Tselita 23:23, 25 June 2008 (BST)