|
User talk:Cyberbob/Archive4
This is where my old discussions on my talk page come to die peacefully. No edits on this page other than by me will be tolerated.
NOTE: This page will be updated monthly.
Editing the Wiki
May 2007
Reverting Edits
Hey, thanks for banning Red Mafiya. I couldn't find instructions on the wiki, so I was wondering how I could revert the edits he made on the LoSH page. --Antipathy
- No worries. As for reverting the edits, go here - it's a summary of all the changes Red Mafiya made. Unfortunately, edits have been made to the page since the vandalism spree, so you'll have to fix it manually. --Hubrid Nox Mod U! 13:07, 10 May 2007 (BST)
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
Criticism
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
Praise
May 2007
June 2007
You
I have come to the conclusion that you are a good person.--Texasxdoom 05:29, 26 June 2007 (BST)
- That makes two of us. --Cyberbob DORIS CGR U! 05:41, 26 June 2007 (BST)
Glad to have you back. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 17:45, 26 June 2007 (BST)
July 2007
August 2007
Thanks! I now,..I should use my own User talk for this, but I rather litter your place since you probably have nothing against me praising you...I really am a fan of your user page, I´d steal a lot from it if you wouldn´t know me already! ..By the way, do you want to commit warcrimes? You know wehre to go! --Wowbagger 11:44, 31 August 2007 (BST)
Other
May 2007
May I ask...
Why you have taken two random votes away from the Murbulskond column in the vote for Mayor. Graman I can vouch for as a legit vote as he's a friend of mine in real life, but earlier you took down a vote from O'shea2 who I don't know. If there was a valid reason, that's fine. I'm just trying to figure out what's going on. -- Murray Jay Suskind 17:12, 1 May 2007 (BST)
- Okay, I saw what you did. We have the same IP address because we work at the same office. Graman is not Murray Jay Suskind. If you want third party validation ask King Romero I. -- Murray Jay Suskind 17:30, 1 May 2007 (BST)
- Unfortunately, the rules in this case are set in stone. --Hubrid Nox Mod U! VOTE FOR KARLOTH 13:31, 2 May 2007 (BST)
having a go
Now, I want to be clear - lets not start any drama. Hmmm, why was I having a go?
Because, to put it simply, you were being a dick.
Secondly, To me you don't seem terribly active - I agree with Vista in that SysOps should go up for re-election once and a while. The wiki at the moment really is an aristocracy run by a (generally) bickering, bitching group who have big egos. Now, I'm not saying you are, but souring up someone's goodbye is entirely my proof of what is wrong with this wiki. Look at both Gage and Mia. They left for different reasons, yet they are both quite bitter about it all. I wonder why? --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 13:33, 10 May 2007 (BST)
- OK. I understand. --Cyberbob Sys U! 12:14, 11 May 2007 (BST)
Mmm, drama
Since you didn't follow the directions on my talk page, I won't follow yours. Anyway, you got in a pissing match with Gage like 5 minutes ago. So you've lost your energy since then, huh? So what will you do as sysop? Stick to V/B?--Lachryma☭ 01:39, 12 May 2007 (BST)
- Better, but you still didn't answer my questions. Chop chop. And remember that you don't really need my vote. Why should you care?--Lachryma☭ 01:45, 12 May 2007 (BST)
- I can understand your concerns regarding the incident with Gage... all I can do is ask you to believe me. That little argument was a once-off brought on by a combination of extreme tiredness, and a fairly bad day at school. Up until exams are over, I plan to pretty much stick to things like Vandal Banning and Speedy Deletions. After exams... we'll see. I'll say this, though: no matter how active I become, I will do my absolute best to steer clear of drama. If someone has a go at me, I'll either ignore them, or attempt to steer the conversation in a more moderate direction (sorry about the delay - this took a little while to write). --Cyberbob Sys U! 01:48, 12 May 2007 (BST)
- Regarding your vote: you're correct in that I don't need it, but I felt I had to address some of your misconceptions. I'm not after your vote, but I am after understanding. --Cyberbob Sys U! 01:50, 12 May 2007 (BST)
- Hell, I barely know you. Why would I judge you? Anyway, the fact that you tried to convince some random person to vote for you says a decent amount. You also put up with my bitch-y ways (well, a small taste of them, anyway). So I'll change my vote. I'll come after you with a whip if I ever see you being mean to a newbie, though.--Lachryma☭ 01:54, 12 May 2007 (BST)EDIT CONFLICT: Understanding, huh? Okay, that makes sense.--Lachryma☭ 01:54, 12 May 2007 (BST)
- I won't let you down. --Cyberbob Sys U! 01:59, 12 May 2007 (BST)
- Hmm...I do respect Boxy's opinion...no matter, you still convinced me. Now I just need one of those mod monitoring thingies...;)--Lachryma☭ 02:03, 12 May 2007 (BST)
Drama
The "attmpt[ing] to make them be reasonable" is what worries me. It can steer a bit too close to flaming, as in the diff link to some guys talk page (who did deserve a reprimand, just not one with profanity). --Darth Sensitive  W! 05:42, 12 May 2007 (BST)
- Poor choice of words on my part, sorry - I only meant that I'd respond reasonably, and in doing so encourage them to do the same. --Cyberbob Sys U! 05:48, 12 May 2007 (BST)
- Yes... i know editing the archive is bad, but I missed this when it was regular. I'll belive that it was a poor choice of words. I would hate to lose you, if you're still up on promations when I get back later, I'll change my vote. --Darth Sensitive W! 17:04, 12 May 2007 (BST)
- Oh, and that guy? When he realised what he'd done, he emailed me and apologised for his mistakes. I immediately apologised back for my over-the-top reaction, and ended up giving him some advice on his editing problems. --Cyberbob Sys U! 05:53, 12 May 2007 (BST)
- Hey,hey No harm no foul. I just (accidentally of course!) bashed a newbie for not signing her comments (Well, the tone did. Not the words.) Everything's good. Just don't start fighting. --User:Axe27/Sig 05:56, 12 May 2007 (BST)
- Believe me, I won't. --Cyberbob Sys U! 05:59, 12 May 2007 (BST)
- Alright. Let's end this week quietly. No need to raise hell. --User:Axe27/Sig 06:02, 12 May 2007 (BST)
June 2007
Repeating Rifle
True enough. But the ability to find repeating rifles and ammo still displaces pistols and shotguns, which already displace each other enough. And I don't really see how my sense of humor is relevant. --Magentaine 18:21, 18 June 2007 (BST)
Hey
Truth be told, if they knew what they were doing, I would be completely off the hook. But those babies are pretty ridiculous. Thanks for the info though. Much appreciated. --SooP 00:03, 26 June 2007 (BST)
July 2007
August 2007
|
