User talk:ScaredPlayer

Barricades

Hi, I've moved your comment from the article to the talkpage. I think you could also use the following. --Midianian^{¦T¦DS¦SP¦} 15:05, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Suggestions

A couple of things: first, when replying to a vote, you have to put the hash first, then the colon (like this: #:). Second, do not reply to other users' votes on suggestions which you didn't make. If you want to reply to them, use the suggestion's talkpage. Third, arguing about whether Spam votes are valid is a waste of time. I know, I've been there. --Midianian^{¦T¦DS¦SP¦} 00:20, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Nah, I don't really care. The annoying thing is that none of them bothered to express their opinions at DevSug, where they say you HAVE TO GO IF YOU WANT TO MAKE A GOOD SUGGESTION!!!! Oh, and btw, just in case, please don't post talk comments in mah templat :P --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 13:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

You can't argue with statistics! :D

The thing is that if they had voiced their opinion there, I'm pretty sure someone would have complained that the comments weren't constructive. It's usually only the people who would vote Kill who make comments on Developing Suggestions. The ones who'd vote Keep usually don't have anything to add and the ones who'd vote Spam usually think commenting on it is a waste of time because they see the suggestion as unfixable (though Keep-people are still more likely to comment than Spam-people). --Midianian^{¦T¦DS¦SP¦} 14:35, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Those pie charts are innacurate. One has 11 total, the other has 16. That smells; I can't be bothered to do the math. --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 17:05, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Um. there were 27 suggestions up for voting in the q1 this year. 16 went through DS, 11 did not. Unless you think suggestions can go through developing suggestions AND not go through developing suggestions? I'd like to see a VENN diagram of that! Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 17:09, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

NPoV

Please keep status updates for suburbs and buildings from a neutral point of view. --Johnny Bass 19:32, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

LOL ma bad so thats wat NPoV stands for. i could never figure it out...

No worries, just a heads up. --Johnny Bass 19:40, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Spam vs. Kill vote junk

From your vote on GPS tags: "My sympathy goes out to you though, as you have become the next victim of excessive and unnecessary spam votes."

Really, I don't see what the big deal is. You've been up in arms about this recently (as have some other people). Sure, the guidelines explain the difference for voting, but when it boils right down to it, Spam votes are counted as Kill votes. It's really not that big of a difference whether someone calls it "spam" or "kill," the vote counts as the same. Also, people have varying opinions of "ridiculous," and some may be voting "spam" just to rile you up. My advice to you is to ignore other votes (if it were in my power I would have votes invisible until after you had voted). --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 19:14, 31 March 2009 (BST)

The spam/kill stuff has been going on for as long as I can remember, so I don't see it going away ever. You also would want to use #: for commenting in numbered lists, as well as using *: to comment in bulleted lists. There's a lot of good formatting stuff here to look at if you are curious. --ZsL 19:30, 31 March 2009 (BST)

WN stuff

You might want to fix this. It should be on the talk page, not the main page. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 00:30, 3 April 2009 (BST)

Holy cow how did you notice me doing that??? That was like a minute ago!!! Further reinforcing my view that WIKI BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING US =00000000000000000000000000000000000

fixed. --ScaredPlayer 00:32, 3 April 2009 (BST)

This template I created ages ago shall explain everything.

	Stalker
	This user stalks the Recent Changes page.

--•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 00:33, 3 April 2009 (BST)

YO I DO THAT TOO

OMFG ESPECIALYL FOR SUGGESTIONS WITH LOTS OF SPAM BEEF GOING ON OMG ADDING IT CAN I STEAL THAT TEMPLATE YE YE YE --ScaredPlayer 00:36, 3 April 2009 (BST)

Oy! Careful with that! That a vintage template there! Dating back to 2 years! Don't make me go all "old school wiki" on you! (But in all due respect, go ahead. It's free for anyone to use. That's is, after all, the purpose of a template.) --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 00:39, 3 April 2009 (BST)

aites aites thanks bub

Urban Dead is like the first time ive used a wiki before, ever. Now i can actually do shit on wikipedia!--ScaredPlayer 00:41, 3 April 2009 (BST)

We're not going anywhere!

[1] --Pestolence^(talk) 23:42, 3 May 2009 (BST)

Heh, no worries. --Pestolence^(talk) 00:53, 4 May 2009 (BST)

DRRP

Oi, I have seen your expressed interest in DRRP. (perhaps a month or two after the fact. What can I say? I tend to avoid the Wiki...) If you wanna join up, head on over to The Forums. Well, if you're still interested, we'd like to hear from you. Just keep in mind that we're not a military group. We're more of a "relax and do what you can" kind of thing. It's a fun alternative to ultra-serious game play.