UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
  -->
  -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -->
==JebJ v. Kristy Cotton==
I would like to request arbitration for the [[Meany Auto Repair]] page. User Kirsty Cotton - http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/User_talk:Kirsty_cotton - and I are having a disagreement over whether a particular photo should be included there. I argue that the photo (and the associated text) is potentially offensive, and unnecessary to keep in the wiki (an opinion shared by Aichon - http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/User_talk:Thanatologist#JebJ), whereas Kirsty believes that the photo and text add needed flavor to the game/wiki.  [[User:JebJ|JebJ]] ([[User talk:JebJ|talk]]) 12:06, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Interesting case. I would be happy to arbitrate this case. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/a}} 22:24, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
:I accept DDR. --<sub>[[User:Kirsty_cotton|<span style="color: lightgrey">K</span>]]</sub> 04:39, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
::Sounds good to me. [[User:JebJ|JebJ]] ([[User talk:JebJ|talk]]) 13:04, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Well, that was just about the quickest setup to arbitration I've ever seen. DDR knows what to do next. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 15:12, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Really! Really? Really. Sometimes I do [[mycock|wonder]] about this wiki. --[[User:Rosslessness|<span style="color: MidnightBlue ">R</span><span style="color: Navy">o</span><span style="color: DarkBlue">s</span><span style="color: MediumBlue">s</span><span style="color: RoyalBlue"></span>]][[User_Talk:Rosslessness|<span style="color: RoyalBlue">l</span><span style="color: CornflowerBlue">e</span><span style="color: SkyBlue">s</span><span style="color: LightskyBlue">s</span>]][[User:Rosslessness/Safehouse_Hatred|<span style="color: LightBlue">n</span><span style="color: PowderBlue">e</span>]][[Monroeville Many|<span style="color: PaleTurquoise">s</span>]][[Location Page Building Toolkit|<span style="color: PaleTurquoise">s</span>]]  21:57, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Where did you find that private picture of ME!?!? {{User:Spiderzed/SallySig}} 01:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Clearly the fair solution to this is to also include a picture of a massive wab there too. Simple. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 23:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Soooo... is something happening with this? [[User:JebJ|JebJ]] ([[User talk:JebJ|talk]]) 03:35, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
:You should poke your arbitrator's talk page. If he's not responding for some reason, you two may want to select a different arbitrator. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 08:14, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Ugh. I am so sorry to both of you, I had a fire in my house a month ago and all my computing gear got taken by insurance to be restored/replaced. So I completely forgot to pop into a lot of places on the web. My apologies to both of you. I am going overseas and won't have internet access until the 14th so I guess it's for the best if you choose a new arbitrator. Apologies again guys and the best of luck to both of you. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/a}} 00:28, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
:Eeep! Sorry to hear about that, DDR! Best of luck getting everything straightened out. Insurance can be a bear to deal with. [[User:JebJ|JebJ]] ([[User talk:JebJ|talk]]) 12:26, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
I offer to arbitrate. ~[[Image:Vsig.png|link=User:Vapor]] <sub>02:25, 4 December 2014 (UTC)</sub>
:Sounds fine to me. [[User:JebJ|JebJ]] ([[User talk:JebJ|talk]]) 12:26, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
:Sure. --<sub>[[User:Kirsty_cotton|<span style="color: lightgrey">K</span>]]</sub> 21:39, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
I will get this started just as soon as I get to a computer (don't want to do it on my mobile). In the meantime, if either of you want another user to represent you, please start on that. If not, just post here and I will get the abry page proper created and begin arbitration. ~[[Image:Vsig.png|link=User:Vapor]] <sub>00:02, 6 December 2014 (UTC)</sub>
: I'm fine representing myself. [[User:JebJ|JebJ]] ([[User talk:JebJ|talk]]) 11:48, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
=Arbitration Cases in Progress=
=Arbitration Cases in Progress=
<!--
<!--
Line 47: Line 20:
''There are currently no cases under consideration''
''There are currently no cases under consideration''
<!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -->
''There are currently no cases in progress.''
''There are currently no cases under consideration''


=Recently Concluded cases=
=Recently Concluded cases=

Latest revision as of 15:11, 7 January 2015

Administration Services

Sysop List (Check) | Guidelines | Policies (Discussion) | Promotions (Bureaucrat) | Re-Evaluations

Deletions (Scheduling) | Speedy Deletions | Undeletions | Vandal Banning (Bots) | Vandal Data (De-Escalations)

Protections (Scheduling) | Move Requests | Arbitration | Misconduct | Demotions | Discussion | Sysop Archives

While the wiki community attempts to work on the basis of encouragement and cooperation, there are occasions where wiki users find themselves unable to reach accord. In the event of this happening, the Arbitration Team may be called upon to intervene, and attempt to find a reasonable compromise that, while perhaps not satisfying both parties, may at least assist in defusing the situation, thanks to the unbiased third party.

Guidelines for Arbitration Requests

In assisting in Arbitration, we generally suggest that both parties agree to the Arbitration. This is not, by any means, a requirement, but we do require that both parties be represented in proceedings.

Any Arbitration request should provide at least the following:

  • The aggrieved parties. Either person vs person, or [list of people] vs [list of people].
  • The reason for the arbitration. This should very specifically be without reference to people, as that information has already been provided. It should be a short paragraph indicating the causes of the aggrievement, and why both parties feel it requires arbitration
  • Any pages affected by the aggrievement. This should be a simple list of links.

Once the Arbitration commences, the Arbitrator will request statements from all parties involved. Any evidence to back up one's statement should be provided in link form. Each party will then have an opportunity to rebut their opponent's statement. After these two steps, the Arbitrator will then consider the case, and reach a conclusion, and determine the outcome that is required. It's the duty of the Arbitrator to move a case he accepted to a subpage of UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration, and to update the status of the arbitration case in the Arbitration Cases in Progress section.

As a note, by requesting an Arbitration, all parties are thus obliged to accept the outcome of the Arbitration. Not doing will be considered Vandalism, and such vandalism attempts will be treated as if the vandal has already received two warnings.

After the Arbitration is over, it will then be moved to an archive page. As publicly accessible pages, they may be used to establish precedent in further, applicable cases.

Current Arbitrators

For guidelines on how to arbitrate, see Arbitration Guidelines.

The following users have placed their hand up as users who are willing to be contacted to act as an Arbitrator. The role of Arbitrator is not restricted to the Administration Team; any user can be contacted as an Arbitrator (even if not listed below) and use this page for the arbitration, so long as both parties agree to the Arbitrator. Users who wish to place their hand up as an Arbitrator should place their name below on the list, using *{{usr|YourUserPage}}

Also note that not all listed Arbitrators are active on the Wiki.

Volunteer Arbitrators in Alphabetical Order

Arbitration Cases Currently Under Consideration

Administration Notice
Use this header to create new arbitration cases. Once all sides have chosen an arbiter, move the case to a sub-page of UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration and update its status in the Arbitration Cases in Progress section.


Arbitration Cases in Progress

There are currently no cases under consideration

Recently Concluded cases

There are currently no recently concluded cases, see the archives for older cases.

Archives