UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→‎Current Arbitrators: not available now)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Shortcut|[[A/A]]}}
{{Shortcut|[[A/A]]}}
{{Moderationnav}}
{{Administrationnav}}
{| align="right"
{| align="right"
|__TOC__
|__TOC__
|}
|}
While the wiki community attempts to work on the basis of encouragement and cooperation, there are occasions where wiki users find themselves unable to reach accord. In the event of this happening, the Arbitration Team may be called upon to intervene, and attempt to find a reasonable compromise that, while perhaps not satisfying both parties, may at least assist in defusing the situation, thanks to the unbiased third party.
{{:UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Intro}}
 
=Guidelines for Arbitration Requests=
 
In assisting in Arbitration, we generally suggest that both parties agree to the Arbitration. This is not, by any means, a requirement, but we do require that both parties be represented in proceedings.
 
Any Arbitration request should provide at least the following:
 
* '''The aggrieved parties.''' Either person vs person, or [list of people] vs [list of people].
* '''The reason for the arbitration.''' This should very specifically be without reference to people, as that information has already been provided. It should be a short paragraph indicating the causes of the aggrievement, and why both parties feel it requires arbitration
* '''Any pages affected by the aggrievement.''' This should be a simple list of links.
 
Once the Arbitration commences, the Arbitrator will request statements from all parties involved. Any evidence to back up one's statement should be provided in link form. Each party will then have an opportunity to rebut their opponent's statement. After these two steps, the Arbitrator will then consider the case, and reach a conclusion, and determine the outcome that is required. It's the duty of the Arbitrator to move a case he accepted to a subpage of UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration, and to update the status of the arbitration case in the [[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration#Arbitration_Cases_in_Progress|Arbitration Cases in Progress]] section.
 
As a note, by requesting an Arbitration, all parties are thus obliged to accept the outcome of the Arbitration. Not doing will be considered Vandalism, and such vandalism attempts will be treated as if the vandal has already received two warnings.
 
After the Arbitration is over, it will then be moved to an archive page. As publicly accessible pages, they may be used to establish precedent in further, applicable cases.
 
=Current Arbitrators=
:''For guidelines on how to arbitrate, see [[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration Guidelines|Arbitration Guidelines]].''
 
The following users have placed their hand up as users who are willing to be contacted to act as an Arbitrator. The role of Arbitrator is not restricted to the Administration Team; any user can be contacted as an Arbitrator and use this page for the arbitration, so long as both parties agree to the Arbitrator. Users who wish to place their hand up as an Arbitrator should place their name below on the list, using {{CodeInline|<nowiki>*{{usr|YourUserPage}}</nowiki>}}
 
Also note that not all listed Arbitrators are active on the Wiki.
 
{| style="margin: 0 auto; padding: 5px; border: 1px solid #AAA; background: #F9F9F9; font-size: 95%; width: 80%; -moz-border-radius:12px"
|-
| colspan="4" style="background: #CCF; text-align: center; -moz-border-radius:6px" | '''Available Arbitrators in Alphabetical Order'''
|- style="vertical-align: top"
|style="width: 33%"|
*{{usr|Acoustic Pie}}
*{{User|Airborne88}}
*{{usr|Akule}}
*[[User:AnimeSucks|AnimeSucks]]
*[[User:Atticus Rex|Atticus Rex]]
*[[User:Axe Hack|Axe Hack]]
*[[User:Blood Panther|Blood Panther]]
*[[User:Boxy|boxy]]
*[[User:Krazy Monkey|Cheeseman]]
*[[User:Conndraka|Conndraka]]
*[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob240]]
*{{usr|DanceDanceRevolution}}
*[[User:DarkStar|DarkStar]]
*[[User:Ashley Valentine|DevilAsh]]
*{{User|Dragon fang}}
*[[User:Drawde|Drawde]]
*[[User:Finis Valorum|Finis Valorum]]
|style="width: 33%"|
*[[User:Funt_Solo|Funt Solo]]
*[[User: Gus Thomas|Gus Thomas]]
*[[User:Galaxy125|Galaxy125]]
*[[User:hagnat|hagnat]]
*[[User:Haliman111|Haliman111]]
*[[User:Headless Gunner|Headless Gunner]]
*[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]]
*[[User:Iscariot|Iscariot]]
*[[User:J3D|Jed]]
*[[User:Jedaz|Jedaz]]
*[[User:JaredV|JaredV]]
*[[User:Karek|Karek]]
*[[User:Kikashie|Kikashie]]
*{{user|Labine50}}
*[[User:Matthewfarenheit|Matthewfarenheit]]
*[[User:Sexylegsread|MichaelRead]]
|style="width: 33%"|
*[[User:MikhailA|MikhailA]]
*[[user:Novascotia|Novascotia]]
*[[user:Nubis|Nubis]]
*[[User:Ottari|Ottari]]
*[[User:Pdeq|Pdeq]]
*[[user:rosslessness|Rosslessness]]
*[[User:Scotw|Scotw]]
*[[User:Seventythree|Seventythree]]
*[[User:Saromu|Sonny Corleone]]
*[[User:Studoku|Studoku]]
*[[User:Suicidalangel|Suicidal Angel]]
*[[User:Toejam|Toejam]]
*[[User:V2Blast|V2Blast]]
*[[User:Xan2020|Xan Krieger]]
*[[User:Zombie slay3r|Z. slay3r]]
|}


=Arbitration Cases Currently Under Consideration=
{{ArbitrationNotice}}
{{ArbitrationNotice}}
=Arbitration Cases Currently Under Consideration=
<!--
<!--


If there is no arbitration cases under consideration, please add the following text to this header
If there is no arbitration cases under consideration, please add the following text to this header
''There are currently no cases under consideration''
''There are currently no cases under consideration''
 
-->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -->
==[[User:Iscariot|St. Iscariot]] vs. [[User:Krazy Monkey|Cheese]]==
This is a case over the ruling in the [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Jorm_and_the_MOB_versus_Zeug_and_Extinction Jorm/Zeug case]. Cheese has exceeded his remit as arbitrator in this case by ordering the circumvention of established wiki procedure.
I wish to have sections of his ruling stricken and declared unenforceable.
I will accept any arbitrator who has shown an understanding for following established wiki policy and procedure in their edit history. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 10:15, 30 September 2008 (BST)
I can has arby? --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 23:38, 30 September 2008 (BST)
:<s>I accept Bob. He has long shown that he follows wiki policy and procedure to the letter. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 23:39, 30 September 2008 (BST)</s>
::My indiscretions are by choice, not by lack of knowledge. You'll also note that I was more than courteous and impartial in my previous case. I take being an arbitrator seriously. --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 00:31, 1 October 2008 (BST)
Seriously though, I think this case is one of the most moronic that has ever been brought. Iscariot basically wants my ruling stricken so that a deleted page can be restored just to be deleted again next week. This is stupid and a waste of time on everyone's part. I refuse to play any part in this. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 00:16, 1 October 2008 (BST)
:Then the arby ruling will happen without any input from you whatsoever. And if he finds an arbitrator sympathetic to his side, he'll get what he wants, thus just wasting more time when the page gets re-deleted. If he's serious, go along, or find representation. You should know all of this. Save others time by sacrificing a little to go with the case.--{{User:Suicidalangel/Sig}} 00:28, 1 October 2008 (BST)
::Fine. I still think this is moronic. But SA has a point. I will represent myself. Arbitrators who want in, please leave a note. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 00:31, 1 October 2008 (BST)
:::Wait a minute. You can not arbitrate against someone that doesn't choose to participate in the arbitration. ''Then the arby ruling will happen without any input from you whatsoever. '' This is complete bullshit. If this was the case then I could go back and find either old pages that the users have "abandoned" or for that matter users that aren't as active these days and set up cases against them, pick my buddy to arby, and get whatever I wanted done. Arbies has to have BOTH parties involved and if Cheese refuses to participate then he can not be forced to. Arbies is an option not required for conflict resolution. --{{User:Nubis/sig}} 13:55, 1 October 2008 (BST)
:::::Shhh, don't tell the peoplez da truth!--{{User:Suicidalangel/Sig}} 00:39, 2 October 2008 (BST)
::::::Actually the rules say an Arbies case can be made without participation of the other side.... however there s no point doing so as without their agreement to enter the process there s no way to make them accept the outcome! --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 02:30, 2 October 2008 (BST)
:::::::And that loophole right there is the crux of what is fucking wrong with this wiki. That needs to be closed up. --{{User:Nubis/sig}} 03:09, 2 October 2008 (BST)
::::You're wrong, sorry. --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 14:12, 1 October 2008 (BST)
:::::It's not really a loophole though is it? You can't force someone to accept arbitration, it goes totally counter to the meaning of the word! Perhaps a seperate procedure for such cases might work but that would really be a case of asking for judgement rather than a negotiated settlement and there is no way that the person bringing such a case should have any control over who rules on it... Hell such a thing should probably be open to public vote like deletions is!--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 14:24, 3 October 2008 (BST)
:::Actually it's probably a good chance to clarify established wiki procedure and underline where Arbitration fits on this wiki. If deletions can be forced through by 'popular' vote (ie meatpuppets) without recourse to arbitration then it's anarchy, a good example is [[UDWiki:Administration/Deletions#UZM|wan's direct recourse to deletion]] twice now with both the original UZM and its redirect. As it is the deletions vote is an easy bad faith way of not bothering with arbitration. As for your ruling being 'unenforceable' ... well it came to the same conclusion as wan's delete request, Iscariot's vote and upheld jorm's request for deletion! It doesn't override or circumvent but rather concurs. It would be enforceable after the vote cos even if the ''Keep's'' won the day I would have requested ''speedy deletion'' as per your ruling. Finally, as original author I changed my vote to ''speedy delete'' and isn't that justification in itself for speedy deletion (criteria #7 Author Edit Only)? Isn't there a procedure to deal with litigious members on this wiki? They're generally a huge waste of time otherwise. --[[User:Zeug|Zeug]] 07:42, 1 October 2008 (BST)
::::Quit your whining, and quit trying to play the victim. No one buys it. ''You'' started this problem, and you escalated it. Time and time again, repeatedly. By refusing to refusing to allow groups them to edit themselves from a public, community page they wanted nothing to do with. ''You'' are the one who caused the friction and drama: this is fallout from a situation you started, fomented and perpetuated. You know it. I know it. ''Everyone'' else knows it.
::::But anyway... We apologise for this interruption, and return you now to your regularly scheduled programming: Zeug's usual arguments ad hominen, facile dissemblings and assorted "other general whinging". --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 08:36, 1 October 2008 (BST)
:::::Shhhh ... it's OK wan. I'm sure everybody understands your pain and we're all here for you buddy. And don't worry, even with [[UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Banning#User:Zeug|4 v/b's]], [[UDWiki:Administration/Deletions#UZM|2 deletions]] and [[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Jorm_and_the_MOB_versus_Zeug_and_Extinction|an arbi case]] called against me over the last few days I can assure you I feel in no way victimized. Quite the opposite, I love the wiki process and I love UD and its social network. And with this case maybe we can put a brake on [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Grim_s&oldid=1278129#Iscariot meatpuppet attacks in the deletions vote].--[[User:Zeug|Zeug]] 12:40, 1 October 2008 (BST)
I'll arbitrate, but you should know that arbitration has a long history of ordering [[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/The_Fifth_Horseman_vs_Akule|deletions]], and frankly, if a decent, impartial arbitrator orders it (as seems to have happened in this case), it is a better system than internet democracy because the decision is made by someone who has all the relevant facts, as presented by the parties involved <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[UDWiki:Image Categorisation|i]]</sup> 10:23 1 October 2008 (BST)</small>
I do not accept Bob, for obvious reasons, and will not accept Boxy due to his sysop status. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 11:49, 3 October 2008 (BST)
:why must you hurt my feelings when i can obviously be imapartial when I arbitrate --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 16:07, 3 October 2008 (BST)
I'm somewhat new to Arbies, having only added myself recently, but I'd be willing.--[[User:drawde|<span style=";color:Black">'''Drawde'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:drawde| <span style=";color: Blue">'''Talk To Me!'''</span>]] [[DORIS| <span style=";color: Black">'''DORIS'''</span>]] [[Red Rum|<span style=";color: Red">Яed Яum</span>]] [[Ridleybank Resistance Front|<span style=";color: Green">Defend Ridleybonk!</span>]] [[The Know Nothings|<span style=";color: Brown">I know Nothing!</span>]]</sup> 20:06, 12 October 2008 (BST)
:I also offer to arby. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 16:28, 13 October 2008 (BST)
=Arbitration Cases in Progress=
=Arbitration Cases in Progress=
<!--
<!--
If there is no arbitration cases under consideration, please add the following text to this header
If there is no arbitration cases under consideration, please add the following text to this header
''There are currently no cases in Progress''
''There are currently no cases under consideration''
 
<!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -->
''There are currently no cases under consideration''


 
=Recently Concluded cases=
==[[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Umbrella_Biohazard_Countermeasure_Servive_vs._Umbrella|Umbrella Biohazard Countermeasure Servive vs. Umbrella]]==
<!--
{{ArbitrationStatus|users=[[User:Haliman111|Haliman]] versus [[User:MisterGame|MisterGame]]|arbitrator=[[User:Krazy Monkey|Cheese]]|created_at=23:22, 30 September 2008 (BST)|created_by=[[User:Haliman111|Haliman]]|status=Awaiting Opening Statements|summary=A dispute over the ownership of the [[Umbrella Biohazard Countermeasure Service]] page.}}
If there are no recently concluded cases, please add the following text to this header
 
''There are currently no recently concluded cases, see the [[:Category:Arbitration Cases|archives]] for older cases.''
==[[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Iscariot and The Order of Philosophe Knights versus Sarah Aline and The Upper Left Corner|Iscariot and The Order of Philosophe Knights versus Sarah Aline and The Upper Left Corner]]==
-->
{{ArbitrationStatus|users=[[User:Iscariot|Iscariot]] versus [[User:S Aline|Sarah Aline]]|arbitrator=[[User:J3D|J3D]]|created_at=17:38, 4 September 2008 (BST)|created_by=[[User:Iscariot|Iscariot]]|status=Awaiting Iscariot's case|summary=Dispute over the content of the [[Southall Mansion]] location page.}}
''There are currently no recently concluded cases, see the [[:Category:Arbitration Cases|archives]] for older cases.''
 
==[[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Jorm and the MOB versus Zeug and Extinction|Jorm and the MOB versus Zeug and Extinction]]==
{{ArbitrationStatus|users=[[User:Jorm|Jorm]] versus [[User:Zeug|Zeug]]|arbitrator=[[User:Krazy Monkey|Cheese]]|created_at=21:32, 22 September 2008|created_by=[[User:Jorm|Jorm]]|status=Waiting for terms of the ruling to be accepted and carried out.|summary=Jorm wants all references to the [[MOB]] removed from Zeug's [[United Zombies of Malton]] portal and from aforementioned portal's wiki page.}}


=Archives=
=Archives=
*[[:Category:Arbitration Cases|List of Arbitration Cases]]
*[[:Category:Arbitration Cases|List of Arbitration Cases]]

Latest revision as of 15:11, 7 January 2015

Administration Services

Sysop List (Check) | Guidelines | Policies (Discussion) | Promotions (Bureaucrat) | Re-Evaluations

Deletions (Scheduling) | Speedy Deletions | Undeletions | Vandal Banning (Bots) | Vandal Data (De-Escalations)

Protections (Scheduling) | Move Requests | Arbitration | Misconduct | Demotions | Discussion | Sysop Archives

While the wiki community attempts to work on the basis of encouragement and cooperation, there are occasions where wiki users find themselves unable to reach accord. In the event of this happening, the Arbitration Team may be called upon to intervene, and attempt to find a reasonable compromise that, while perhaps not satisfying both parties, may at least assist in defusing the situation, thanks to the unbiased third party.

Guidelines for Arbitration Requests

In assisting in Arbitration, we generally suggest that both parties agree to the Arbitration. This is not, by any means, a requirement, but we do require that both parties be represented in proceedings.

Any Arbitration request should provide at least the following:

  • The aggrieved parties. Either person vs person, or [list of people] vs [list of people].
  • The reason for the arbitration. This should very specifically be without reference to people, as that information has already been provided. It should be a short paragraph indicating the causes of the aggrievement, and why both parties feel it requires arbitration
  • Any pages affected by the aggrievement. This should be a simple list of links.

Once the Arbitration commences, the Arbitrator will request statements from all parties involved. Any evidence to back up one's statement should be provided in link form. Each party will then have an opportunity to rebut their opponent's statement. After these two steps, the Arbitrator will then consider the case, and reach a conclusion, and determine the outcome that is required. It's the duty of the Arbitrator to move a case he accepted to a subpage of UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration, and to update the status of the arbitration case in the Arbitration Cases in Progress section.

As a note, by requesting an Arbitration, all parties are thus obliged to accept the outcome of the Arbitration. Not doing will be considered Vandalism, and such vandalism attempts will be treated as if the vandal has already received two warnings.

After the Arbitration is over, it will then be moved to an archive page. As publicly accessible pages, they may be used to establish precedent in further, applicable cases.

Current Arbitrators

For guidelines on how to arbitrate, see Arbitration Guidelines.

The following users have placed their hand up as users who are willing to be contacted to act as an Arbitrator. The role of Arbitrator is not restricted to the Administration Team; any user can be contacted as an Arbitrator (even if not listed below) and use this page for the arbitration, so long as both parties agree to the Arbitrator. Users who wish to place their hand up as an Arbitrator should place their name below on the list, using *{{usr|YourUserPage}}

Also note that not all listed Arbitrators are active on the Wiki.

Volunteer Arbitrators in Alphabetical Order

Arbitration Cases Currently Under Consideration

Administration Notice
Use this header to create new arbitration cases. Once all sides have chosen an arbiter, move the case to a sub-page of UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration and update its status in the Arbitration Cases in Progress section.


Arbitration Cases in Progress

There are currently no cases under consideration

Recently Concluded cases

There are currently no recently concluded cases, see the archives for older cases.

Archives