|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Shortcut|[[A/PM]]}} | | {{Shortcut|[[A/PM]]}} |
| {{Moderationnav}} | | {{Administrationnav}} |
| {{Promotions Intro}} | | {{:A/PM/Intro}} |
| ==Candidates still requiring vouches==
| |
| <!-- ''Place all new promotion bids under this header'' -->
| |
| ''Place all new promotion bids under this header''
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Candidates currently under community discussion== | | ==Candidates Being Discussed== |
| ==={{usr|J3D}}===
| | <!--- |
| Hey, it's me again. One of the main concerns last time i applied was my [[A/VD#J3D|vandalism]], while i can't go back and have it not happen, i haven't had any vandalism warnings etc since my promotion bid in july and, due to my invovlement in the wiki all existing bannings have been struck. I basically want to be a sysop as it would allow me to better perform various roles around the wiki and i feel i'd provide a different perspective than the existing team. Theres no need to be concerned about me being another inactive sysop, i've been around for 18 months plus and i've got no plans to leave anytime soon. Ummm if you want to know anymore i suggest you read over my [[UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/J3D|old bid]], i went into a few lengthly speels there. If you have any questions feel free to ask, etc etc.-{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:16, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| *'''Vouch''' - he's a good'n.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 05:25, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
| | ''There are no candidates at this time.'' |
| *'''Vouch''' - The way I see it is, Jed ''wants'' to be a sysop. He ''will'' work tirelessly and fairly because he wants this job so badly. This is what we need on this wiki. We need sysops who want to do the jobs they are asked to do. Today, we have sysops who decide they are going to become inactive in times of controversy, perhaps a time when they are ''most'' needed. They don't rule on A/VB or A/M and they don't have a say in pressing or important deletions cases because giving their opinion may make them look bad, or might lose them "respect". We need more sysops who are willing to do the work that may lose them friends, but is ultimately right for the wiki. Jed is the right man for this job, and always has been.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 05:39, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Abstain''' - He seems like a decent fellow, but unfortunately, I just don't know enough about him to make a valid judgment. [[User:Linkthewindow|<span style="color: DodgerBlue">Linkthewindow</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Linkthewindow|<span style="color: DarkRed">Talk</span>]] </sup> 08:00, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Vouch''' Questions: what sysop only tasks do you want to focus on and what parts of the wiki are you most active in at the moment?--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 08:08, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| *:I'm more or less active across the wiki, there's not a whole lot i don't stick my head in and check out every now and then. I used to have nothing to do with suggestions but i'm a regular on [[Developing Suggestions]] and a vote whenever i see suggestions nowadays. In regards to sysop powers , protecting and unprotecting will be a big one, many archival tasks need that and it's always annoying when you go to do something and see you can't, a/vb obviously as i've always been involved with a/vb in one way or another as well as akule's new unbanning of permabanned users discussion and of course deletions stuffs. Yeah that pretty much covers it.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:15, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| *::Good answers, I don't doubt your skill or commitment but i do worry slightly about your judgement... that said you do show a willingness to discuss and if necissary modify your opinion and that together with your oft stated desire to see Sysops become more accountable to the community make me more than willing to give you the benefit of the doubt--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 14:19, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Question''': I want to know what has changed about your attitude and responsibility to the wiki and its community since your first promotion bid. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 08:45, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| *:My attitude and responsibility to the wiki are much the same as they were last time, my views on sysopshipness have changed slightly, which i guess comes from the changing of the guard. If you mean regarding vandalism, then i'm fairly sure my clean sheet since july says everything i need to.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:01, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Vouch''' - he cares for this place. This is more than enough for me. I dont like what he did to [[ALiM]], but that doesnt change the fact that i think he would do a good job being a psyop --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 10:33, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Vouch''' Because I like it when a sysop pays enough attention to make edits like [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User:Rosslessness/Random_Rambling/Sandbox13&diff=1310571&oldid=1310373 this]. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 10:43, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| *:Haha glad you 'preciate it. It was really annoying me so i had to get it :P --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:45, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| *Honestly, some of his behaviour in the past has been a bit iffy. But we all have done stuff like it, so its not that big of a deal.I'm willing to put my opinion behind him, but on one condition. Should the community decide that he's no longer fit, he will agree to put him self up for a review of some sort.We don't need another sysops that no one trusts being around, and then we can't get rid of him. So, a compromise. Seems fair enough to me, as we don't have an official channel for review yet.--{{User:Suicidalangel/Sig}} 11:17, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| *:fyi i do plan to put up a voting to axe sysops policy in the near future. I do have doubts it'll pass though, we shall see.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:20, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Vouch''' - From what I've seen from many of his edits, he sounds like a decent person. Plus, I've never had any personal problems with him, so why not? If he wants the SysOp position this badly, then let him have it. If he performs poorly, yank him. But if he performs above and beyond the calls of a normal SysOp, then it's a win for the Wiki community.--{{User:Omega360/Sig}} 13:18, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Vouch'''. Am I allowed to comment here? I'm just a peon. Whatever. I'm going to comment here. I like this guy. Look at [[ALiM]]; if that's not commitment to the wiki, I don't know what is. If you're worried about vandalism, well, that's stupid. This isn't some sort of "license to vandalize" here. --[[User:Blackboard|Blackboard]] 13:43, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Abstain''' - You've improved, but things like the truckload of drama on [[UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2008_10|last month's A/VB]] says to me that you're not quite ready yet. --[[User:Midianian|Midianian]] <small><sup>'''Big Brother Diary Room: [513,04]'''</sup></small> 13:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Against'''. I have nothing against your contributions to the wiki in general, but I have a real problem with your attitude and the company you keep. Just re-reading the Oct. A/VB page made my mind up. I don't think you are ready yet based on your comment to boxy when he was voting not vandalism on your 1st (of 3) VB cases. ''Wow i'm impressed! Correct! Gotta be the first time in, what, a month? Since you probably didn't mean it i'll let you change your decision and rule based on your personal opinions of users.--J3D 08:40, 24 October 2008 (BST) '' And yes, I am basing this on my "personal opinion of users." While I know we can all be dicks from time to time I would think that someone trying to get a sysop position would be more willing to work with the current sysops.--{{User:Nubis/sig}} 14:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Vouch'''. Top guy, helped me when i started, when no one else did, so yeah give him a chance!!!--[[User:Jay|Jay]] 15:26, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Strong Against''' - I have no problem with you but, this bid reeks of an attempt to get promoted through two new and relatively inexperienced 'crats because Grim is gone. I'm pretty sure that if I were 'crat instead of Cheeseman you wouldn't have even considered it, same with boxy, Nubis, or any other sysop you could have been sure would actually force consideration of promotions before promoting willy nilly(yes I find it strange having boxy on that list but it's become a really short list). Much like the last bid you share much in common with Cheeseman, that's not good and I don't want another stint of what it was like right after Cheeseman was promoted, too much work for everyone else. You're a part of the community but not the parts where you'll be forced to monitor; More than that, you've spent a lot of time around A/VB for all the wrong reasons.--<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 18:04, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Vouch''' Willy-nillies for EVERYBODY!!!! [[User:Conndraka|Conndraka]]<sup>[[Moderation|mod]] [[User_talk:Conndraka|T]][[AZM]] [[Coalition for Fair Tactics|''CFT'']]</sup> 19:23, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Vouch''' Because I can. --[[User:JaredV|JaredV]] 21:35, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Vouch''' - Though, I have a concern when you said you went into ''"a few lengthy '''speels''' "''--{{User:AnimeSucks/Sig}} 21:57, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Vouch''' To put it simply, why not? -- [[User:Cisisero|Cisisero]] 22:32, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Archived Promotions==
| | !---> |
| | ''There are no candidates at this time.'' |
|
| |
|
| *[[:Category:Promotions Candidacies|Complete list of Promotion Requests]] | | ==Recent Bids== |
| *[[:Category:Successful Promotions Candidacies|Successful Promotions Candidacies]] | | |
| *[[:Category:Unsuccessful Promotions Candidacies|Unsuccessful Promotions Candidacies]] | | ===[[User:Hagnat]]=== |
| *[[:Category:Unaccepted Nominations|Unaccepted Nominations]] | | *[[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Hagnat/2019-08-14 Promotion|Archived as Unsuccessful]]. |
| *[[:Category:Withdrawn Promotions Candidacies|Withdrawn Promotions Candidacies]] | | |
| | ===[[User:DanceDanceRevolution]]=== |
| | *[[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/DanceDanceRevolution/2018-07-30 Promotion|Archived as Successful]]. |
| | |
| | ==Archived Bids== |
| | ''For earlier promotion bids, see the following:'' |
| | *[[:Category:{{CURRENTYEAR}}_Promotion_Archives|This year's promotion bids]] |
| | *[[:Category:{{LASTYEAR}}_Promotion_Archives|Last year's promotion bids]] |
| | *[[A/SA|Sysop Archives]] for older bids and related sysop activities |
This page is for users to request System Operator status. The act of user promotion is restricted to those with bureaucrat status, and as such users will need to request user promotion here. System Operators and Bureaucrats cannot assign promotions unless the request has gone through this page.
Guidelines for System Operator Requests
Users who wish to request System Operator status (and users who wish to nominate other users for System Operator status) should note that before they can be considered the following guidelines should be met by the candidate:
- Significant time within the community.
- We define this as at least 6 months since the candidate's first edit.
- Note: looking in a User's User contributions might give false results for this criterion, as the edit history is periodically purged on this wiki.
- Significant activity within the community.
- We define this as at least 250 edits in the past six months under the candidate's name.
- Note: looking in a User's User contributions might give false results for this criterion, as the edit history is periodically purged on this wiki.
- Prior interest in maintaining the community.
- We define this as clear evidence that the candidate is already performing maintenance tasks and taking leadership roles on the wiki.
- Desire to become a System Operator.
- We define this simply as indicating in the candidate's request their desire for the position (Note that if a person is nominated by another user, the candidate in question should note their acceptance of the nomination).
If a user is highly exemplary in one criterion, a certain amount of leeway may be given with the other criteria.
Once the candidate satisfies these guidelines, the user is then subject to a community discussion. All users are asked to comment on the candidate in question, ask questions of the candidate, and discuss the candidate's suitability for becoming a System Operator. This is not a vote. It is instead merely a request for comments from the wiki community. This will continue for two weeks to allow all users an opportunity to voice their opinion regarding a candidate's qualifications for promotion. After two weeks, the Bureaucrats are responsible for announcing their decision within a reasonably short period of time. Users may continue to add their thoughts until the Bureaucrats announce their decision. The current amount of System Operators running should not influence your decisions when voicing your opinion.
Once the two weeks are up, the Bureaucrats will review the community discussion and make a decision based upon it. The user will be notified of the status of their request, and will be promoted should it appear that the community is willing to accept them as a System Operator.
Example Application
I've been around 3 months, and I've made to date 550 edits. As you can see [link here] and [link here], I've been in the leadership role attempting to create a new format for this page. I'd very much like to become a System Operator.
- Vouch - I am willing to vouch for this user. -- Voucher 03:41, 23 Jan 2006 (GMT)
- Against - Example User, I haven't seen any evidence of your work on the wiki. --Some user 19:01, 25 July 2006 (BST)
- Vouch - Example User is the most active guy here. --Another user 19:01, 25 July 2006 (BST)
- Abstain - I'm just not sure, but I don't want to say why for some reason. --Some other user 19:01, 25 July 2006 (BST)
- Question - I just want to know what you think about this subject? --Yet another user 21:26, 4 April 2013 (BST)
Candidates Being Discussed
There are no candidates at this time.
Recent Bids
Archived Bids
For earlier promotion bids, see the following:
